DoD's Army Awarded $34M for Architectural Services Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,098,321 ($34.1M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-05-05

End Date: 2020-09-30

Contract Duration: 4,531 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 7.1.2-7.1.4 SERVICES

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $34.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: 7.1.2-7.1.4 SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant contract value of over $34 million awarded. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration spans over 12 years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The award is for miscellaneous foreign awardees, raising potential oversight considerations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value is substantial, but without specific per-unit cost data or comparison to similar architectural service contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult. The duration suggests potential for cost escalation over time.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery. However, the 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' designation might imply a less concentrated pool of bidders than typically seen in domestic full and open competitions.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally aims to secure the best value for taxpayers. The long duration and foreign awardees warrant scrutiny to ensure continued cost-effectiveness.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may benefit from competitive pricing, but the long-term nature of the contract requires ongoing monitoring. The use of foreign awardees could impact local economies or present unique logistical challenges. Transparency in the selection and performance of these foreign architectural services is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long contract duration (over 12 years)
  • Award to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' may lack specific vendor identification
  • Lack of detailed cost breakdown for services

Positive Signals

  • Utilized full and open competition
  • Firm fixed price contract type

Sector Analysis

Architectural services are crucial for infrastructure development and maintenance across government agencies. The benchmark for such contracts varies widely based on project scope and location. This $34 million award over 12 years for miscellaneous foreign awardees suggests a broad or ongoing need for specialized design expertise.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the award went to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' and does not specify if small businesses were involved or targeted. Further investigation would be needed to determine any small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The long duration of this contract necessitates robust oversight to ensure performance standards are met and costs remain justified. The 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' designation requires careful tracking and accountability to ensure compliance and value.

Related Government Programs

  • Architectural Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration may lead to cost inefficiencies over time.
  • Lack of specific vendor identification for 'miscellaneous foreign awardees'.
  • Potential for geopolitical and currency risks associated with foreign awardees.
  • Limited insight into the specific architectural services rendered.
  • No clear indication of small business participation.

Tags

architectural-services, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $34.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. 7.1.2-7.1.4 SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-05-05. End: 2020-09-30.

What specific architectural services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Army's strategic infrastructure goals?

The contract specifies 'Architectural Services' (NAICS 541310) for miscellaneous foreign awardees. While the exact nature of these services isn't detailed, they likely encompass design, planning, and potentially oversight for various construction or renovation projects abroad. Their alignment with strategic goals would depend on the specific projects undertaken, which are not disclosed in this data.

Given the 12-year duration and foreign awardees, what mechanisms are in place to mitigate risks related to currency fluctuations, geopolitical instability, and differing regulatory environments?

The contract's firm fixed price structure offers some protection against cost overruns due to inflation or currency shifts. However, specific clauses addressing geopolitical risks, compliance with local laws, and dispute resolution for foreign contracts would be critical. The Department of Defense likely has established protocols for managing these risks in overseas operations.

How was the 'best value' determined in this full and open competition, particularly when awarding to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees'?

In a full and open competition, 'best value' is typically determined through a combination of technical merit, past performance, and price. For foreign awardees, the evaluation might also consider factors like local expertise, understanding of regional building codes, and logistical capabilities. The 'miscellaneous' designation suggests the award may have been made to a group or a less defined set of entities, requiring careful justification of the selection process.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesArchitectural Services

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $42,902,255

Exercised Options: $42,902,255

Current Obligation: $34,098,321

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-05-05

Current End Date: 2020-09-30

Potential End Date: 2020-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-07-08

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending