DoD's Army Awards $30M in Architectural Services via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $30,037,738 ($30.0M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-12-06
End Date: 2031-12-31
Contract Duration: 9,156 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 7.1.2-7.1.3 SERVICES
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $30.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: 7.1.2-7.1.3 SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant contract value of over $30 million for architectural services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Long contract duration extending to 2031 indicates a sustained need for these services. 4. The contract is firm fixed price, providing cost certainty for the government.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract is firm fixed price, which is generally favorable for cost control. Benchmarking against similar architectural services contracts would be necessary for a precise value assessment, but the competitive award method suggests reasonable pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government compared to limited or sole-source procurements.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally positive for taxpayers as it promotes efficiency and cost-effectiveness in government spending.
Public Impact
Supports critical infrastructure development and maintenance for the Department of the Army. Provides opportunities for multiple architectural firms to compete for significant government contracts. Ensures a competitive market for architectural services within the defense sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration could lead to scope creep or evolving requirements.
- Potential for price increases if not managed effectively over the contract term.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost predictability.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust market engagement.
- Long-term award supports consistent service delivery.
Sector Analysis
Architectural services are crucial for designing and overseeing construction projects within the defense sector. Spending benchmarks for such services vary widely based on project complexity and location, but this contract represents a substantial investment in the Army's infrastructure.
Small Business Impact
While awarded under full and open competition, the data does not specify if small businesses participated or benefited from subcontracts. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The long duration of the contract necessitates ongoing oversight to ensure adherence to scope, quality, and budget. Regular performance reviews and audits would be key accountability mechanisms.
Related Government Programs
- Architectural Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (over 15 years) increases risk of obsolescence or changing needs.
- Potential for contractor lock-in due to the extended period.
- Requires diligent oversight to manage scope and prevent cost overruns.
- Lack of specific detail on small business participation.
Tags
architectural-services, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $30.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. 7.1.2-7.1.3 SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-12-06. End: 2031-12-31.
What specific types of architectural projects will this contract support, and how do they align with current Army infrastructure priorities?
The contract is for miscellaneous architectural services, suggesting a broad range of potential projects including design, planning, and potentially oversight for various Army facilities. Understanding the specific project types is crucial to assess alignment with current infrastructure modernization, expansion, or maintenance priorities. This ensures the spending directly contributes to strategic defense objectives and addresses critical needs.
How will the Army ensure continued cost-effectiveness and prevent potential price escalation over the contract's 15-year duration?
The firm fixed price structure provides initial cost certainty. However, the Army must implement robust contract management, including regular performance reviews and potentially incorporating mechanisms for price adjustments based on objective market data or inflation indices, if stipulated. Proactive engagement with the contractor to manage scope and identify efficiencies will be vital to maintain value over the long term.
What metrics will be used to evaluate the effectiveness and quality of the architectural services provided under this contract?
Effectiveness will likely be measured by the successful completion of projects on time and within budget, adherence to design specifications, and client satisfaction. Quality metrics could include the accuracy and completeness of design documents, compliance with building codes and standards, and the durability and functionality of the designed structures. Performance-based metrics tied to project outcomes are essential.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $30,235,106
Exercised Options: $30,235,106
Current Obligation: $30,037,738
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-12-06
Current End Date: 2031-12-31
Potential End Date: 2031-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-03-19
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)