DoD's Army Awarded $22M for Architectural Services via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,075,957 ($22.1M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-11-30
End Date: 2014-07-31
Contract Duration: 2,800 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: ABG 7.1.2 - 7.1.3
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: ABG 7.1.2 - 7.1.3 Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $22.1M for architectural services. 2. Awarded to miscellaneous foreign awardees, raising potential oversight questions. 3. Contract duration spans over 7 years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The use of Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests cost certainty.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $22.1M for architectural services appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts would be necessary to determine if this represents a fair price, especially given the foreign awardees.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. However, the specific awardees being 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' might limit the pool of domestic bidders and impact price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers by encouraging competitive bids. The final price paid will depend on the effectiveness of the bidding process and the quality of the services rendered.
Public Impact
Potential impact on domestic architectural firms due to foreign awardees. Long-term nature of the contract suggests ongoing infrastructure or development needs. Transparency in the selection of foreign awardees is crucial for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Foreign awardees may present unique logistical or oversight challenges.
- Lack of specific details on the 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' hinders assessment.
- Long contract duration could lead to scope creep or price adjustments if not managed carefully.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition was utilized, promoting a competitive environment.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type offers cost predictability.
Sector Analysis
Architectural services are crucial for government infrastructure projects. The $22.1M awarded is a significant sum, and the sector typically involves competitive bidding processes to ensure value for taxpayer money.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The award to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' suggests that small businesses, particularly domestic ones, may not have been primary recipients of this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight of contracts with foreign awardees requires diligent monitoring to ensure compliance with terms, quality standards, and ethical practices. The Department of the Army's oversight mechanisms will be critical for this contract's success.
Related Government Programs
- Architectural Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential lack of transparency regarding foreign awardees.
- Risk of challenges in oversight and quality control with foreign entities.
- Limited visibility into the specific services rendered for the $22.1M.
- Potential impact on domestic small business participation.
Tags
architectural-services, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. ABG 7.1.2 - 7.1.3
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-11-30. End: 2014-07-31.
What specific architectural services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Army's strategic infrastructure goals?
The contract specifies 'Architectural Services' (NAICS 541310). While the exact nature of these services isn't detailed, they likely pertain to the design, planning, and potentially oversight of construction or renovation projects for Army facilities. Understanding the specific projects would reveal how they support broader infrastructure modernization or operational readiness objectives.
What due diligence was performed on the 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' to ensure their capability, reliability, and compliance with U.S. standards and regulations?
The selection of foreign awardees necessitates rigorous vetting. This would typically involve verifying their technical expertise, financial stability, past performance, and adherence to ethical business practices. Ensuring compliance with U.S. security protocols and legal frameworks is paramount, especially for defense-related contracts.
How was the Firm Fixed Price determined, and what mechanisms are in place to manage potential cost overruns or scope changes over the contract's 7-year duration?
A Firm Fixed Price is usually established based on detailed cost estimates and market research. For long-term contracts, mechanisms like defined change order procedures, clear scope definitions, and regular performance reviews are crucial. The government must ensure that any modifications are justified and priced appropriately to prevent undue cost increases.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,087,817
Exercised Options: $22,087,817
Current Obligation: $22,075,957
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-11-30
Current End Date: 2014-07-31
Potential End Date: 2014-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-07-07
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)