DoD Awards $26.2M Facility Maintenance Contract to Choctaw Defense Services Inc. at Fort McCoy
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,202,956 ($26.2M)
Contractor: Choctaw Defense Services Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-01-12
End Date: 2022-10-31
Contract Duration: 2,118 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF FACILITY MAINTENANCE SERVICES @ FORT MCCOY
Place of Performance
Location: SPARTA, MONROE County, WISCONSIN, 54656
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $26.2 million to CHOCTAW DEFENSE SERVICES INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF FACILITY MAINTENANCE SERVICES @ FORT MCCOY Key points: 1. Significant contract value for facility maintenance services. 2. Choctaw Defense Services Inc. is the sole awardee. 3. Contract duration spans over 5 years. 4. Services fall under Facilities Support Services sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $26.2M over 5 years suggests a substantial investment in facility maintenance. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large-scale facility support services is necessary to assess pricing efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a limited competition approach. This method may impact price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs compared to unrestricted full and open competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for facility maintenance at Fort McCoy. The limited competition raises questions about whether the most cost-effective solution was secured.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness and upkeep of critical infrastructure at Fort McCoy. Supports military personnel and operations through well-maintained facilities. Potential impact on local economy through contractor employment and resource utilization.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition may not yield the best price.
- Long contract duration could lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
Positive Signals
- Provides essential facility maintenance services.
- Supports a specific military installation's needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which is crucial for the operational efficiency of government installations. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the size and needs of the facility.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that Choctaw Defense Services Inc. is the awardee. Further analysis is needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if this contract represents a missed opportunity for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract officers and potentially inspectors general to ensure performance and adherence to terms.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition
- Potential for price inflation
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown
- Need for performance metric clarity
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, wi, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $26.2 million to CHOCTAW DEFENSE SERVICES INC. IGF::OT::IGF FACILITY MAINTENANCE SERVICES @ FORT MCCOY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHOCTAW DEFENSE SERVICES INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-01-12. End: 2022-10-31.
What was the justification for excluding other sources in the competition?
The justification for excluding other sources is critical for understanding the procurement strategy. Typically, this involves specific technical requirements, urgent needs, or unique capabilities that only a particular contractor can meet. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the limited competition was warranted or if it restricted potential cost savings.
How does the per-unit cost of services compare to industry benchmarks?
Benchmarking the per-unit cost against industry standards for similar facility maintenance services at comparable installations is essential. This analysis would reveal if Choctaw Defense Services Inc.'s pricing is competitive or inflated due to the limited competition. A detailed cost breakdown and comparison would provide a clearer picture of value for money.
What performance metrics are in place to ensure service quality and effectiveness?
Effective oversight requires clear performance metrics and service level agreements (SLAs). Understanding these metrics will help determine if the contractor is meeting the required standards for facility maintenance. Regular performance reviews and audits are crucial to ensure the agency receives the expected value and that taxpayer money is used efficiently.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912ES17R0002
Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3 SKYWAY DR STE 102, MCALESTER, OK, 74501
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Government, HUBZone Firm, Native American Tribal Government, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $26,202,956
Exercised Options: $26,202,956
Current Obligation: $26,202,956
Actual Outlays: $1,068,059
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-01-12
Current End Date: 2022-10-31
Potential End Date: 2022-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-05-21
More Contracts from Choctaw Defense Services Inc
- Laughlin Base Operation Support Services — $70.6M (Department of Defense)
- Annual Funding Task Order for Ordering Period 4 Standing Work Under the Boss Kodiak Contract. This Task Order Replaces Task Order 70z08422fpkh01700 — $17.0M (Department of Homeland Security)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)