DoD's $32.9M Roofing Contract Awarded to Barlovento LLC for Louisiana Repairs
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $32,899,839 ($32.9M)
Contractor: Barlovento LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2021-09-05
End Date: 2021-12-31
Contract Duration: 117 days
Daily Burn Rate: $281.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: ROOFING REPAIRS
Place of Performance
Location: BATON ROUGE, EAST BATON ROUGE County, LOUISIANA, 70801
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $32.9 million to BARLOVENTO LLC for work described as: ROOFING REPAIRS Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in facility maintenance. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for this service. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 4. Short performance period indicates a focused scope of work for immediate needs. 5. Geographic focus on Louisiana highlights regional infrastructure priorities. 6. Contractor's performance history will be key to assessing overall value.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $32.9 million for roofing repairs appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar roofing contracts for military installations is necessary to determine if this represents a fair market price. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty, but the absence of detailed cost breakdowns makes a granular value assessment challenging. Without comparative data on per-square-foot costs or material markups, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust process was intended.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process is favorable for taxpayers as it typically drives down costs and encourages contractors to offer their best value propositions.
Public Impact
Military personnel and their families stationed in Louisiana benefit from improved facility conditions. Essential roofing services are delivered to ensure operational readiness and safety of military infrastructure. The geographic impact is concentrated in Louisiana, addressing specific regional maintenance needs. The contract supports the construction and maintenance workforce, likely through local hiring and material sourcing.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise beyond the scope of standard roofing repairs.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a large-value project carries execution risk.
- Limited transparency on specific cost components may obscure true value for money.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides budget predictability.
- Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive pricing environment.
- Awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a focus on critical infrastructure needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the construction and facilities maintenance sector, specifically focusing on specialized trades like roofing. The market for government roofing contracts is substantial, driven by the need to maintain extensive federal real property across various agencies. This award represents a significant portion of spending within this niche, reflecting the ongoing demand for infrastructure upkeep.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. While the primary award went to Barlovento LLC, it is possible that subcontracting opportunities may exist for small businesses within the scope of the roofing work. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army contracting command. Performance monitoring, quality assurance checks, and adherence to contract terms are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
- Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts
- Federal Building and Infrastructure Repair Programs
- General Services Administration (GSA) Building Operations
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope expands beyond initial assessment.
- Execution risk due to project scale and contractor capacity.
- Limited transparency on cost breakdown hinders value assessment.
- Geographic concentration may introduce localized risks (weather, supply chain).
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, louisiana, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, construction, facilities-maintenance, roofing-contractors, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $32.9 million to BARLOVENTO LLC. ROOFING REPAIRS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BARLOVENTO LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $32.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-09-05. End: 2021-12-31.
What is the track record of Barlovento LLC with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?
Barlovento LLC has been awarded federal contracts, including this significant roofing repair project for the Department of the Army. Analyzing their contract history would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any history of contract disputes or terminations, and the types of services they have previously provided to the government. A positive performance record with similar projects would increase confidence in their ability to execute this contract successfully. Conversely, a history of issues could indicate potential risks. Specific details on past performance metrics and client feedback are crucial for a comprehensive assessment.
How does the awarded amount compare to industry benchmarks for similar roofing projects of this scale?
To benchmark the $32.9 million award, one would need to compare it against the cost per square foot, material costs, labor rates, and project complexity of similar roofing projects undertaken by other federal agencies or in the commercial sector. Factors such as the type of roofing system, the extent of damage, the need for specialized materials (e.g., for extreme weather resistance), and prevailing labor costs in Louisiana would influence the price. Without access to detailed project specifications and comparative market data, it is challenging to definitively state whether this award represents a competitive market rate. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to cap costs.
What are the primary risk indicators associated with this specific contract award?
Key risk indicators for this contract include the potential for scope creep if unforeseen structural issues are discovered during the repairs, which could lead to cost increases despite the fixed-price nature. The contractor's capacity to manage a project of this magnitude within the specified timeframe (117 days) is another consideration. Furthermore, reliance on a single awardee for a large sum introduces execution risk. The geographic concentration in Louisiana might also present localized risks related to weather delays or specific regional supply chain challenges. Finally, the lack of detailed cost breakdowns limits the ability to assess potential overpricing.
What is the expected effectiveness of these roofing repairs in enhancing facility resilience and operational continuity?
The effectiveness of these roofing repairs hinges on the quality of the work performed and the suitability of the chosen materials for the specific environmental conditions in Louisiana. Properly executed repairs should significantly reduce the risk of water intrusion, which can cause extensive damage to building interiors, equipment, and sensitive materials, thereby protecting operational continuity. Enhanced facility resilience means that military installations can better withstand adverse weather events, ensuring that critical functions are not disrupted. The long-term effectiveness will also depend on the durability of the new roofing system and adherence to any specified maintenance schedules.
How does this contract's value compare to historical federal spending on roofing and facility maintenance in the region?
Comparing this $32.9 million contract to historical spending requires analyzing aggregate data on federal facility maintenance and repair budgets, specifically for roofing services, within Louisiana or similar geographic areas over previous fiscal years. This would involve looking at the frequency and value of past roofing contracts awarded by the Department of Defense and other agencies operating in the state. Understanding the trend in spending—whether it's increasing, decreasing, or stable—provides context for the current award. A significant deviation from historical averages might warrant further investigation into the reasons, such as increased infrastructure needs, inflation, or a shift in maintenance strategies.
Are there any specific performance metrics or deliverables outlined in the contract that can be used to measure success?
The provided data does not detail specific performance metrics or deliverables. However, typical roofing contracts include requirements for adherence to building codes, manufacturer specifications, warranty provisions, and completion within the agreed-upon timeframe. Success would likely be measured by the absence of leaks post-repair, the durability of the installed materials, compliance with safety standards, and timely project completion. The contracting officer's final acceptance of the work serves as the ultimate measure of success, implying that all contractual obligations have been met to the government's satisfaction.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors › Roofing Contractors
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 431 TECHNOLOGY DR, DOTHAN, AL, 36303
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $32,899,839
Exercised Options: $32,899,839
Current Obligation: $32,899,839
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9128F20D0043
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-09-05
Current End Date: 2021-12-31
Potential End Date: 2021-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-03-17
More Contracts from Barlovento LLC
- Award of Recapitalize Family Housing Station Portage U. S. Coast Guard Station Portage, Dollar BAY, MI — $12.9M (Department of Homeland Security)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)