Doyon Project Services awarded $11.4M for NRL electrical updates under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,383,966 ($11.4M)

Contractor: Doyon Project Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-05-10

End Date: 2024-12-24

Contract Duration: 1,324 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT FOR ELECTRICAL UPDATES AT THE NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY IN WASHINGTON, DC

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20375

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.4 million to DOYON PROJECT SERVICES, LLC for work described as: MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT FOR ELECTRICAL UPDATES AT THE NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY IN WASHINGTON, DC Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 2. Task order contract structure allows for flexibility in addressing specific project needs. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts risk to the contractor for cost overruns. 4. Project duration of 1324 days indicates a significant, long-term infrastructure undertaking. 5. Electrical updates at a research facility highlight the importance of reliable infrastructure for scientific endeavors. 6. Geographic concentration in Washington D.C. may indicate a focus on federal facilities in the capital region.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $11.4 million for electrical updates at the Naval Research Laboratory appears reasonable given the project's scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale electrical infrastructure projects for federal facilities suggests that this price falls within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price structure further supports value by incentivizing contractor efficiency. Without specific details on the scope of 'electrical updates,' a precise comparison is challenging, but the overall investment aligns with the criticality of maintaining secure and functional research environments.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific task order. While two bidders is not extensive, it does provide a basis for price comparison and ensures that the award was made to the offeror deemed to provide the best value. The specific details of the bidding process, such as the number of proposals received and the evaluation criteria, would offer further insight into the robustness of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and better quality services. This approach ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, increasing the likelihood of obtaining services at a fair market price.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the researchers and staff at the Naval Research Laboratory, who will gain access to updated and reliable electrical infrastructure. The services delivered include essential electrical system upgrades, ensuring operational continuity and safety for critical research activities. The geographic impact is localized to Washington D.C., specifically the Naval Research Laboratory campus. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for electricians, project managers, and support staff involved in the construction and installation phases.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if 'electrical updates' are not precisely defined, leading to cost increases.
Dependency on a single task order awardee for a significant duration could limit future competitive opportunities.
The firm-fixed-price nature, while beneficial, could lead to contractor disputes if unforeseen site conditions arise.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a fair and transparent procurement process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Long contract duration allows for phased implementation and minimizes disruption to ongoing research.
Focus on critical infrastructure upgrades at a key research facility demonstrates proactive asset management.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically focusing on electrical system upgrades. The market for federal construction and renovation projects is substantial, driven by the need to maintain and modernize aging government facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks for large-scale electrical retrofits in institutional settings can vary widely based on facility size, complexity, and specific upgrade requirements. This contract represents a significant investment in specialized construction services for a high-security, research-oriented federal site.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. The award to Doyon Project Services, LLC, a company not immediately identifiable as a small business from the data, suggests that the primary competition was likely among larger firms. This means that the direct economic impact on the small business ecosystem through this specific contract may be limited unless Doyon Project Services actively engages small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and project management offices, given the Department of Defense (DoD) agency. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the contract's award under full and open competition, with details likely available through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Naval Research Laboratory Facilities Modernization
Department of Defense Infrastructure Projects
Federal Building Electrical System Upgrades
Military Construction Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for scope definition ambiguity
Contract duration exceeds typical project timelines
Limited competition (2 bidders)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.4 million to DOYON PROJECT SERVICES, LLC. MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT FOR ELECTRICAL UPDATES AT THE NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY IN WASHINGTON, DC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOYON PROJECT SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-05-10. End: 2024-12-24.

What is the specific scope of 'electrical updates' covered by this contract, and how does it compare to typical electrical modernization projects in similar research facilities?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of 'electrical updates.' However, typical electrical modernization projects in research facilities often include upgrading power distribution systems, replacing aging wiring, installing new lighting, enhancing emergency power capabilities (generators, UPS), and integrating smart building technologies for energy efficiency and monitoring. These projects are critical for supporting sensitive research equipment, ensuring safety, and meeting current building codes and energy standards. Without a detailed SOW, a precise comparison is difficult, but the $11.4 million value suggests a comprehensive overhaul rather than minor repairs, likely encompassing significant infrastructure replacement and upgrades to meet the demanding power requirements of a research laboratory.

What was the estimated cost or baseline for this project before the bids were submitted, and how did the awarded price compare?

The provided data does not include information on the government's independent cost estimate or baseline for this project. We only know the awarded contract value of $11,383,966.40 to Doyon Project Services, LLC. In a full and open competition with two bidders, the awarded price is typically the result of the competitive bidding process. To assess how the awarded price compares to a baseline, one would need access to the government's estimate at completion (EAC) or the initial solicitation's cost projections. Without this internal government data, it's impossible to definitively state if the awarded price was significantly higher or lower than anticipated.

What is Doyon Project Services, LLC's track record with the Department of Defense and specifically with the Naval Research Laboratory?

The provided data indicates that Doyon Project Services, LLC was awarded this specific contract. However, it does not offer details about their past performance, track record, or previous contracts with the Department of Defense or the Naval Research Laboratory. A comprehensive assessment of their track record would require searching federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for previous awards, contract performance evaluations (CPARS), and any history of disputes or claims. Without this additional information, it is difficult to evaluate their experience and reliability for this type of project.

How does the $11.4 million expenditure for electrical updates compare to historical spending on facilities maintenance and upgrades at the Naval Research Laboratory?

The provided data does not contain historical spending figures for the Naval Research Laboratory's facilities maintenance and upgrades. To make this comparison, one would need to analyze past contract awards and budget allocations for the NRL over several fiscal years. Understanding the NRL's overall facilities budget, the proportion allocated to electrical systems, and the frequency of major upgrades would provide context. An $11.4 million contract for electrical updates suggests a significant investment, potentially indicating a major modernization effort or addressing long-deferred maintenance. Without historical data, it's challenging to determine if this represents a typical expenditure or an exceptional one.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract, and how will they be monitored?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics for this contract. However, for construction projects of this nature, common KPIs typically include adherence to schedule (on-time completion of milestones and final delivery), quality of workmanship (meeting specifications, minimizing defects), safety performance (incident rates), and budget adherence (completing work within the firm-fixed-price). Monitoring would likely involve regular site inspections, progress reports from the contractor, project management meetings, and potentially third-party quality assurance reviews. The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) would be responsible for overseeing performance against the contract requirements.

Given the firm-fixed-price nature, what mechanisms are in place to manage potential cost overruns or change orders if unforeseen issues arise during the electrical updates?

In a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract, the contractor assumes the primary risk for cost overruns. However, mechanisms for managing unforeseen issues typically involve a formal change order process. If the government requires changes outside the original scope, or if unforeseen site conditions significantly impact the contractor's ability to perform the work as specified, a contract modification (change order) may be issued. These modifications would typically involve a negotiation of the price and schedule impact. Strict adherence to the contract's scope of work and thorough site investigations prior to award are crucial to minimize the need for such changes. The Contracting Officer has the authority to approve or deny change orders based on contract terms and justification.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912DR16R0001

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 33810 WEYERHAEUSER WAY S STE 100, FEDERAL WAY, WA, 98001

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,383,966

Exercised Options: $11,383,966

Current Obligation: $11,383,966

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DR17D0012

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline