Department of the Army awards $24.3M for barracks and dining facility construction and restoration
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,342,068 ($24.3M)
Contractor: KCI Construction CO
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-12-30
End Date: 2014-01-31
Contract Duration: 1,493 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::31134RP# TRAINING BARRACKS BUILDING 816 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TO ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::31135RP# TRAINING BARRACKS BUILDING 817 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TO ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::31136RP# TRAINING BARRACKS BUILDING 818 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TO ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::37830RP# DINING FACILITY BUILDING 820 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::37831RP# OPS BUILDING 822 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TO ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING STANDARD BN OPS
Place of Performance
Location: FORT LEONARD WOOD, PULASKI County, MISSOURI, 65473
State: Missouri Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.3 million to KCI CONSTRUCTION CO for work described as: TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::31134RP# TRAINING BARRACKS BUILDING 816 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TO ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::31135RP# TRAINING BARRACKS BUILDING 817 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TO ADVANCED IN… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on critical infrastructure upgrades for advanced individual training facilities. 2. Project scope includes replacement and restoration of multiple buildings, indicating significant renovation needs. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 5. Project duration spans over four years, from late 2009 to early 2014. 6. The work is concentrated in Missouri, impacting a specific geographic region for military training.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $24.3 million for the restoration and replacement of four key training facilities (three barracks and one dining facility) appears substantial. Without specific per-building cost breakdowns or detailed scope of work for each component, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests an effort to cap government liability. Benchmarking against similar large-scale military construction projects would be necessary for a more definitive evaluation of cost-effectiveness.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and terms for the government. The agency's decision to use full and open competition suggests confidence in the market's ability to provide qualified contractors for this type of construction work.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential bidders, increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions, ultimately leading to better value for public funds.
Public Impact
Benefits military personnel undergoing advanced individual training by providing modernized and functional living and dining facilities. Services delivered include comprehensive replacement and restoration of building components, ensuring structural integrity and operational readiness. Geographic impact is concentrated in Missouri, where the training facilities are located. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction workers and related trades in the project's vicinity.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during extensive building restoration.
- Long project duration increases exposure to market fluctuations in material and labor costs.
- Dependence on a single contractor (KCI Construction Co.) for multiple critical facility upgrades.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost uncertainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process that could yield favorable pricing.
- Focus on essential training infrastructure upgrades supports military readiness and personnel welfare.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. The work involves substantial renovation and replacement of existing structures, requiring expertise in managing large-scale building projects. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other major military construction or renovation contracts, particularly those focused on training facilities or barracks, to assess the cost per square foot or per building against industry standards.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Given the scale and nature of the project, it is likely that KCI Construction Co. is a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award. The absence of a small business set-aside suggests that the primary contract was awarded based on best value or lowest price technically acceptable, without specific targets for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and project management offices. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor bears most of the cost risk, but government oversight would still be crucial to ensure quality, adherence to specifications, and timely completion. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed project progress reports and Inspector General involvement would depend on specific agency policies and any identified issues.
Related Government Programs
- Military Barracks Construction and Renovation
- Defense Training Facility Modernization
- Government Building Restoration Projects
- Large-Scale Construction Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long project duration may indicate complexity or potential for delays.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown per building hinders granular value assessment.
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, missouri, barracks, dining-facility, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, large-project, infrastructure-upgrade, training-facility
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.3 million to KCI CONSTRUCTION CO. TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::31134RP# TRAINING BARRACKS BUILDING 816 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TO ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::31135RP# TRAINING BARRACKS BUILDING 817 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TO ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::31136RP# TRAINING BARRACKS BUILDING 818 REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS TO ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS TAS::21 2022::TAS RECOVERY PROJECT#::3
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KCI CONSTRUCTION CO.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-12-30. End: 2014-01-31.
What was the specific scope of work for each of the four buildings (3 barracks, 1 dining facility) included in this contract?
The provided data indicates that the contract involved 'REPLACE AND RESTORE ALL COMPONENTS' for Training Barracks Buildings 816, 817, and 818, and Dining Facility Building 820, to 'ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING STANDARD BN OPS' for Building 822. This suggests comprehensive overhauls rather than minor repairs. Specifics would detail structural work, HVAC, plumbing, electrical systems, interior finishes, and potentially site work for each building. Without detailed statements of work, it's difficult to ascertain the exact nature of the restoration and replacement for each component, which is crucial for understanding cost drivers and potential risks.
How many bids were received for this contract, and what was the range of proposed prices?
The data confirms the contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' (ct: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION) and lists the number of offers received as 10 (no: 10). However, the specific bid amounts from each of the 10 offerors are not provided in this dataset. Knowing the number of bids (10) is positive, as it indicates significant market interest. To fully assess the value and competitiveness, comparing the winning bid ($24.3 million) against the other nine proposals would be essential. This would reveal how competitive the pricing truly was and whether the award represented a strong deal for the government.
What is the historical spending pattern for similar barracks and dining facility construction/renovation projects by the Department of the Army?
Historical spending on similar projects by the Department of the Army can vary significantly based on location, scope, and economic conditions. For instance, barracks construction might range from $50,000 to $200,000 per bed, depending on amenities and building standards. Dining facilities can cost millions, with prices influenced by capacity, kitchen complexity, and design. The $24.3 million award for four facilities suggests an average of over $6 million per facility. Analyzing past contracts for similar-sized barracks and dining halls, especially those completed in the years preceding this award (2009-2014), would provide a benchmark to evaluate if this contract's pricing was within expected ranges or if it represented an outlier, either high or low.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract, and how did KCI Construction Co. perform against them?
Key performance indicators for construction contracts like this typically include on-time completion, adherence to budget (especially relevant for fixed-price contracts), quality of workmanship (meeting specifications and building codes), safety record, and client satisfaction. The data shows the contract duration was 1493 days (dur: 1493), spanning from December 30, 2009, to January 31, 2014. Without access to performance reports, inspection records, or post-completion reviews, it's impossible to definitively assess KCI Construction Co.'s performance against these KPIs. However, the completion within the specified timeframe (though long) and the absence of immediate red flags in the award data suggest a generally acceptable execution, but detailed performance metrics are not publicly available.
Are there any known issues or disputes related to KCI Construction Co.'s performance on this or similar government contracts?
Information regarding specific disputes or performance issues for KCI Construction Co. on this particular contract (Award ID: DCA) is not readily available in the provided dataset. A comprehensive review would require searching contract databases for past performance information (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), legal filings, or agency audit reports. While the award itself doesn't indicate major past performance problems, the absence of this information doesn't guarantee a flawless record. Government contractors can face various challenges, including minor disputes, change order negotiations, or quality control issues that may not always result in public disputes but can impact project timelines or costs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912DQ10R4002
Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 10315 LAKE BLUFF DR, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,342,068
Exercised Options: $24,342,068
Current Obligation: $24,342,068
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-12-30
Current End Date: 2014-01-31
Potential End Date: 2014-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-07-17
More Contracts from KCI Construction CO
- PN64365 Temf With Site Work - NEW Construction of Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility Located AT Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri — $32.9M (Department of Defense)
- 200507!500531!2100!w912dq!usa Engineer District Kansas Cty!w912dq05c0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20050331!20070330!031056690!031056690!031056690!n!kci Construction Company !10315 Lake Bluff Drive !affton !mo!63123!25264!169!29!fort Leonard Wood !pulaski !missouri !+000013352535!n!n!000013352535!y199!other Miscellaneous Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!u!j!2!004!a! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !d!d!a!a!000!a!c!y! !N! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $14.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)