DoD Awards $14.4M Construction Contract to KCI Construction Company for Fort Leonard Wood

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,385,118 ($14.4M)

Contractor: KCI Construction CO

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-03-31

End Date: 2007-07-10

Contract Duration: 831 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200507!500531!2100!W912DQ!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT KANSAS CTY!W912DQ05C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20050331!20070330!031056690!031056690!031056690!N!KCI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY !10315 LAKE BLUFF DRIVE !AFFTON !MO!63123!25264!169!29!FORT LEONARD WOOD !PULASKI !MISSOURI !+000013352535!N!N!000013352535!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!004!A! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !D!D!A!A!000!A!C!Y! !N! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT LEONARD WOOD, PULASKI County, MISSOURI, 65473

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.4 million to KCI CONSTRUCTION CO for work described as: 200507!500531!2100!W912DQ!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT KANSAS CTY!W912DQ05C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20050331!20070330!031056690!031056690!031056690!N!KCI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY !10315 LAKE BLUFF DRIVE !AFFTON !MO!63123!25264!169!29!FORT LEONARD WOOD !PULA… Key points: 1. The contract was awarded for miscellaneous building construction, a common need for military installations. 2. KCI Construction Company, based in Affton, MO, secured the award. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The duration of the contract was approximately 2 years, with a value of $14.4 million.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $14.4 million for miscellaneous building construction appears reasonable given the project scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar construction contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process likely resulted in a fair market price, maximizing the value of taxpayer funds spent on this construction project.

Public Impact

Supports infrastructure development at Fort Leonard Wood, enhancing military operational capabilities. Provides construction jobs and economic activity in the Missouri region. The project contributes to the modernization and maintenance of federal facilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration of 831 days may indicate potential for cost overruns if not managed effectively.
Lack of specific details on the 'OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS' scope makes precise value assessment difficult.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive price.
Contract awarded to a single entity, potentially streamlining project execution.
Project supports critical military infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. Federal spending in this sector is substantial, supporting infrastructure across various government agencies and military bases.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to KCI Construction Company, which is not explicitly identified as a small business in this data. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was incorporated or if subcontracting opportunities were provided.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was managed by the USA ENGINEER DISTRICT KANSAS CITY, part of the Department of the Army. Standard federal procurement oversight processes would apply to ensure contract compliance and performance.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Contract duration is lengthy (831 days), increasing potential for cost escalation.
Scope of 'miscellaneous buildings' is vague, hindering detailed value analysis.
No explicit mention of small business participation or subcontracting.
Potential for unforeseen site conditions or design changes in construction projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.4 million to KCI CONSTRUCTION CO. 200507!500531!2100!W912DQ!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT KANSAS CTY!W912DQ05C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20050331!20070330!031056690!031056690!031056690!N!KCI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY !10315 LAKE BLUFF DRIVE !AFFTON !MO!63123!25264!169!29!FORT LEONARD WOOD !PULASKI !MISSOURI !+000013352535!N!N!000013352535!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KCI CONSTRUCTION CO.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-03-31. End: 2007-07-10.

What specific types of 'miscellaneous buildings' were constructed under this contract, and how did their scope influence the final cost?

The contract data specifies 'OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS' without further detail. To assess value accurately, a breakdown of the building types, their intended use (e.g., barracks, training facilities, administrative offices), and associated square footage would be necessary. This level of detail would allow for comparison with industry standards and similar construction projects.

Were there any significant cost variances or change orders during the contract's 831-day duration that impacted the final $14.4 million award amount?

The provided data does not detail contract modifications or change orders. A review of the contract's performance history, including any amendments or supplemental agreements, would be required to identify potential cost variances. Such information is crucial for understanding the final price's relationship to the initial bid and assessing effective cost management.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was achieved for this specific construction project?

While 'full and open competition' generally promotes value, its effectiveness here depends on the number and quality of bids received. Without bid data, it's hard to quantify the competitive pressure. However, the contract's duration and value suggest a significant project where competition is expected to yield a reasonable outcome, assuming robust evaluation criteria were used.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10315 LAKE BLUFF DRIVE, AFFTON, MO, 63123

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline