DoD's $10.3M Sewer Line Project Awarded to ESI Contracting Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,331,103 ($10.3M)
Contractor: ESI Contracting, Corp.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-29
End Date: 2010-01-11
Contract Duration: 1,200 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: SEWER LINE MODIFICATION
Place of Performance
Location: KANSAS CITY, JACKSON County, MISSOURI, 64101
State: Missouri Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.3 million to ESI CONTRACTING, CORP. for work described as: SEWER LINE MODIFICATION Key points: 1. The Department of Defense awarded a $10.3 million contract for sewer line modification. 2. ESI Contracting, Corp. secured the award through full and open competition. 3. The contract type is a Firm Fixed Price Definitive Contract. 4. The project falls under 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' with a NAICS code of 237990.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $10.3 million appears reasonable for heavy civil engineering construction. Benchmarking against similar large-scale infrastructure projects would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a competitive process that aimed to maximize price discovery and value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely benefited from a fair market price for the sewer line modifications.
Public Impact
Ensures critical infrastructure functionality for military operations. Supports local community by maintaining essential services. Provides employment opportunities through the awarded contractor.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration of 1200 days (approx. 3.3 years) may indicate potential for scope creep or delays.
- The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause in the competition method warrants further review to ensure it did not unduly limit competition.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs and manage budget.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, which is vital for maintaining and upgrading public and military infrastructure. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on government infrastructure initiatives and defense needs.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. The definitive contract structure implies a clear scope and deliverables.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost escalation due to long contract duration.
- Ambiguity in 'Exclusion of Sources' clause requires clarification.
- Lack of small business participation data.
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions in heavy civil engineering.
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, mo, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.3 million to ESI CONTRACTING, CORP.. SEWER LINE MODIFICATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ESI CONTRACTING, CORP..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-29. End: 2010-01-11.
What was the specific reason for excluding sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, and did it impact the final price?
The specific reason for excluding sources is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such exclusions are based on unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or specific security requirements. Understanding the rationale is crucial to assess if the exclusion limited competition unfairly or was justified, and consequently, how it might have influenced the final price achieved through the bidding process.
Given the 4-year contract duration, what are the potential risks associated with cost escalation or unforeseen site conditions for this sewer line modification project?
A 4-year duration for a sewer line modification project presents risks of cost escalation due to inflation, material price fluctuations, and potential labor cost increases over time. Unforeseen site conditions, such as encountering unexpected soil types, underground utilities, or environmental hazards, could lead to significant delays and require costly change orders, impacting the overall project budget and timeline.
How effectively did the Firm Fixed Price contract type manage the $10.3 million expenditure for this extensive infrastructure project?
The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is designed to provide cost certainty for the government by shifting most of the risk to the contractor. For a $10.3 million project, an FFP contract implies that ESI Contracting, Corp. agreed to perform the work for a set price. This structure is generally effective in controlling expenditures, assuming the initial scope was well-defined and the contractor adequately accounted for all potential costs and risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912DQ06B0006
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3001 E 83RD ST, KANSAS CITY, MO, 64132
Business Categories: Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,331,103
Exercised Options: $10,331,103
Current Obligation: $10,331,103
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-29
Current End Date: 2010-01-11
Potential End Date: 2010-01-11 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-09-27
More Contracts from ESI Contracting, Corp.
- Levee Repairs — $29.6M (Department of Defense)
- Blue River Modifications - Brush Creek to 53RD Street. This Contract IS a FFP Design Build Contract — $20.0M (Department of Defense)
- Tuttle Creek Lake Riprap Placement — $17.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)