DoD's $22.1M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,122,399 ($22.1M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-09-12

End Date: 2009-09-11

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $60.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $22.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a broad market search. 2. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by establishing a set price for services. 3. The duration of 364 days indicates a short-term need for these facilities support services. 4. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' raises questions about the specific entities performing the work and their geographic location. 5. The lack of specific Product/Service Code (PSC) and a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code of 561210 (Facilities Support Services) provides context for the services rendered. 6. The contract was a single award, which can sometimes indicate specialized needs or limited vendor availability.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this $22.1 million contract is challenging without more specific details on the services provided and the geographic location of performance. The fixed-price nature is a positive cost control measure. However, the award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' without further clarification makes it difficult to assess if the pricing is competitive or if it represents good value for money compared to domestic or more clearly identified foreign providers. Further investigation into the specific services and the rationale for awarding to this broad category of awardees is needed.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that the Department of Defense sought proposals from all responsible sources. The fact that it resulted in a single award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' suggests that either only one entity met the requirements, or the specific nature of the services led to a limited pool of qualified bidders despite the broad solicitation. The level of competition, while initially open, ultimately resulted in a single award, which warrants further examination to understand if optimal price discovery was achieved.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to solicit the best possible pricing and services. However, the single award to a broadly defined group of foreign awardees may limit the direct benefit of robust competition if the specific capabilities or pricing were not fully optimized.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of Defense facilities requiring maintenance and repair services. Services delivered include general facilities support, maintenance, and repair operations. The geographic impact is not specified but is implied to be in a location where foreign awardees can operate for the Department of Defense. Workforce implications are unclear, but the contract would support jobs related to facilities management and maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specificity regarding 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' hinders understanding of contractor identity and location.
The broad categorization of awardees may obscure potential risks associated with specific foreign entities.
Limited insight into the specific services rendered makes it difficult to assess performance quality.
The fixed-price contract type, while good for cost control, could lead to scope creep if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating an effort to maximize market participation.
Fixed-price contract type helps to establish cost certainty for the government.
The contract duration is clearly defined, allowing for focused service delivery.
The contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a critical operational category for the DoD.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of maintenance, repair, and operational services for physical infrastructure. The market for these services is substantial, with significant government spending allocated annually to ensure the upkeep and functionality of its vast real estate holdings. This specific award, valued at over $22 million, represents a portion of the Department of Defense's overall investment in maintaining its operational readiness and infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale facilities support contracts awarded by various government agencies, considering factors like contract type, duration, and geographic scope.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract included small business set-asides, as the 'sb' field is false. Furthermore, the award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' suggests that small businesses, particularly domestic ones, were unlikely to be direct recipients of this prime contract. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not explicitly detailed but would depend on the specific requirements and the nature of the foreign awardees' operations. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal for this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting agency, the Department of the Army, within the Department of Defense. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the fixed-price definitive contract, including performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is somewhat limited due to the broad categorization of the awardees. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected in the procurement or execution of the contract.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Global Facilities Support Services
Foreign Military Support Contracts
Army Facilities Management
Fixed-Price Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of specificity in awardee identification
Potential for unclear performance oversight
Unknown contractor vetting process

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $22.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-09-12. End: 2009-09-11.

What specific services were included under this $22.1 million facilities support contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 561210, Facilities Support Services, and the Product Service Code (PSC) is listed as 'MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR'. This suggests the contract encompassed a range of activities related to the upkeep, maintenance, and repair of physical facilities. However, without more granular detail, it is difficult to ascertain the exact scope. This could include services such as janitorial, pest control, grounds maintenance, building repair (electrical, plumbing, HVAC), waste management, and other operational support functions necessary to ensure facilities are functional and safe. The broad nature of 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' further complicates a precise definition of services without additional documentation.

What is the rationale behind awarding a significant contract to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'?

The designation 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' is highly unusual and suggests a lack of specific identification for the entities receiving the funds. This could stem from several reasons, including the contract being awarded through a mechanism that aggregates multiple foreign entities, or perhaps a classification issue within the reporting system. It is possible that the services were required in a specific foreign location where these entities operate, and they were the most suitable or only available providers meeting the government's requirements. Alternatively, it could indicate a contracting strategy to procure services indirectly through foreign partners. Further investigation into the contracting office's justification and the specific performance location would be necessary to understand the strategic or operational reasons behind this broad award category.

How does the fixed-price contract type impact cost control and risk for this facilities support service?

A fixed-price contract type is generally advantageous for cost control as it establishes a predetermined price for the work to be performed. This shifts the risk of cost overruns from the government to the contractor. For facilities support services, this means the contractor is responsible for delivering the agreed-upon services within the contracted price. If the contractor incurs higher costs than anticipated due to inefficiencies or unforeseen issues, their profit margin will decrease. Conversely, if they can perform the services more efficiently than planned, their profit will increase. This structure incentivizes the contractor to manage their costs effectively and perform the services diligently to meet the contract's objectives within the agreed budget.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding contracts to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'?

Awarding contracts to a broad category like 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' presents several potential risks. Firstly, there is a lack of transparency regarding the specific entities involved, making it difficult to vet their reliability, security clearances (if applicable), and compliance with U.S. regulations or ethical standards. Secondly, it complicates oversight and performance monitoring, as the government may have less direct leverage or understanding of the awardees' operational environments. Thirdly, there could be geopolitical or national security risks if the awardees have ties to adversarial nations or entities. Finally, it raises questions about fair competition and whether the government is obtaining the best value compared to clearly identified and vetted domestic or allied foreign contractors.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Department of the Army?

Historical spending data for facilities support services by the Department of the Army is substantial, reflecting the vast infrastructure the service branch manages globally. While this specific $22.1 million contract is a single award, the Army consistently allocates significant budgets towards maintenance, repair, and operational support for its bases, training facilities, and administrative buildings. Annual spending in this category often runs into billions of dollars across various contract types and scopes, including construction, renovation, and ongoing operational services. Analyzing past contracts would reveal trends in service providers, contract durations, and the prevalence of different contract types (fixed-price vs. cost-reimbursement) used to procure these essential services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,122,399

Exercised Options: $22,122,399

Current Obligation: $22,122,399

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline