Department of Defense spent $44M on facilities support services, awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,062,188 ($44.1M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-10-01

End Date: 2008-09-30

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $120.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $44.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR Key points: 1. The contract value of $44M for facilities support services represents a significant investment in maintaining operational readiness. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract suggests a robust market for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type indicates a clear understanding of scope and cost expectations. 4. The relatively short duration of one year may point to a need for frequent re-evaluation of service needs or market conditions. 5. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests the primary awardee was not a small business, or the contract was not specifically targeted for them. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a focus on supporting Army installations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $44M contract is challenging without more specific details on the scope of facilities support services. However, for a one-year duration, this amount suggests a substantial scope of work, potentially covering multiple installations or complex maintenance requirements. Comparing it to similar contracts for facilities support services would require detailed service descriptions and geographic locations. The firm fixed-price nature provides cost certainty but could lead to less value if the contractor's costs are significantly lower than anticipated.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This typically suggests a competitive environment where multiple companies vied for the contract. The number of bidders is not specified, but the designation implies a healthy level of competition, which should theoretically drive down prices and improve service quality.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more cost-effective solutions and better pricing for government services.

Public Impact

Military personnel and civilian staff benefit from well-maintained facilities, ensuring operational readiness and a safe working environment. Essential services such as maintenance, repair, and potentially custodial services are delivered to Department of the Army installations. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the specific Army installations where the facilities are located. The contract supports the facilities management workforce, potentially including maintenance technicians, engineers, and administrative staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the quality of services delivered.
The one-year duration might indicate a short-term need or a strategy to re-compete frequently, potentially increasing administrative overhead.
Limited information on the contractor's past performance or track record makes it hard to gauge reliability.
The broad category of 'Facilities Support Services' could encompass a wide range of activities, making precise value assessment difficult without further detail.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that should yield fair pricing.
The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract supports essential operational needs for the Department of the Army.
The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' might indicate specialized capabilities or a strategic sourcing decision, though further context is needed.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services is a broad category within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This contract likely falls under the facilities management sub-sector, which includes a wide range of services from routine maintenance and repair to specialized technical support for buildings and infrastructure. The market is typically characterized by a mix of large, diversified service providers and smaller, specialized firms. Government spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to maintain extensive real property portfolios across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary awardee was likely a large business, or the contract was competed broadly without specific small business considerations. There is no information provided on subcontracting plans, so the impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear. It is possible that a large prime contractor could utilize small businesses for specific tasks, but this is not explicitly stated.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring and quality assurance would be key oversight mechanisms to ensure services meet contractual requirements. Transparency is facilitated by the public availability of contract award data, but detailed performance reports or Inspector General investigations related to this specific award are not provided in the given data.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance and Repair Services
Base Operations Support Services
Logistics and Support Services
Government Property Management

Risk Flags

Contract Awarded to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' - Requires further due diligence on contractor identity and performance.
Lack of Specific Deliverables - Difficulty in assessing scope and performance.
Short Contract Duration - May indicate market testing or budget uncertainty.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $44.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $44.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-10-01. End: 2008-09-30.

What specific types of facilities support services were included in this $44M contract?

The provided data categorizes this contract under 'Facilities Support Services' (NAICS 561210) and indicates the work type as 'MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR'. However, the specific deliverables are not detailed. This could encompass a wide range of activities such as routine building maintenance, HVAC repair, plumbing, electrical work, groundskeeping, pest control, and janitorial services. Without a detailed statement of work, it's impossible to ascertain the precise scope and therefore the full value proposition of the $44 million expenditure.

How does the $44 million contract value compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?

Direct comparison of the $44 million contract value is difficult without knowing the specific scope, duration, and geographic location of the services. Facilities support contracts can vary dramatically. A one-year contract of this size suggests either a very large installation or a broad scope covering multiple facilities. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare it against other contracts for similar services (e.g., maintenance and repair) awarded to similar types of facilities (e.g., Army bases) over comparable timeframes. The 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' designation also adds a layer of complexity, as it might imply specialized services or a unique market dynamic not typical of domestic contracts.

What is the track record of 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' in providing facilities support services to the Department of Defense?

The designation 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' is a broad category and does not refer to a single entity with a specific track record. It implies that the awardee(s) are foreign entities, but lacks specificity regarding their identity or history. To assess track record, one would need to identify the specific foreign entity or entities that received this award and then research their past performance on government contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense or for facilities support services. Without this specific identification, assessing their reliability, experience, and past performance is not possible.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a facilities support contract to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'?

Potential risks associated with foreign awardees can include challenges related to legal jurisdiction, currency exchange rate fluctuations (though less likely with fixed-price contracts), differing labor laws and standards, logistical complexities, and potential national security concerns depending on the nature of the facilities supported. Additionally, communication barriers or cultural differences could impact service delivery and oversight. The government would need robust mechanisms in place to ensure compliance with U.S. regulations and standards, and to manage these cross-border operational challenges effectively.

How does the firm fixed-price contract type influence the value and risk for this facilities support services contract?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type establishes a ceiling price that the contractor must not exceed, regardless of the actual costs incurred. This provides the government with significant cost certainty and transfers most of the cost risk to the contractor. For the government, the primary benefit is predictability in budgeting. The value is realized if the contractor performs efficiently within the fixed price. However, if the scope of work is not well-defined or if unforeseen issues arise, the contractor might cut corners to maintain profitability, potentially impacting service quality. Conversely, if the contractor is highly efficient, the government benefits from a potentially lower price than other contract types might yield.

What does the one-year duration of this contract imply about the Department of the Army's strategy for facilities support?

A one-year duration for a facilities support contract, especially one valued at $44 million, can imply several strategic considerations. It might indicate that the Army is testing the market, evaluating specific service providers, or facing budget uncertainties that preclude longer-term commitments. Alternatively, it could be a deliberate strategy to allow for frequent re-competition, ensuring that contracts remain current with market prices and evolving service needs. Shorter durations can also be used to mitigate risks associated with long-term contracts, allowing for adjustments or changes in requirements more readily.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $44,062,188

Exercised Options: $44,062,188

Current Obligation: $44,062,188

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline