DoD Awards $15.1M Engineering Services Contract to Benham-Stanley, LLC for 2702 Days
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,092,713 ($15.1M)
Contractor: Benham-Stanley, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2019-05-08
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 2,702 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Engineering Services
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF::A-E SERVICES CSOF 35% PACKAGE
Place of Performance
Location: COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80912
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.1 million to BENHAM-STANLEY, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF::A-E SERVICES CSOF 35% PACKAGE Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Benham-Stanley, LLC for engineering services. 2. Significant duration of 2702 days suggests a long-term need. 3. Full and open competition was utilized. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $15.1 million over 2702 days results in an average annual value of approximately $5.58 million. This appears reasonable for complex engineering services, though a direct comparison requires more detailed scope information.
Cost Per Unit: $15,092,713 / 2702 days = $5,585.76 per day
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition and a firm fixed price contract suggests efforts to maximize taxpayer value and minimize cost uncertainty.
Public Impact
Supports critical engineering services for the Department of the Army. Long-term contract provides stability for service provider and agency. Potential for follow-on work or expansion based on performance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is exceptionally long, potentially leading to scope creep or outdated services if not managed diligently.
- Lack of specific small business participation noted.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Clear awardee and agency identified.
Sector Analysis
Engineering services (NAICS 541330) are crucial for infrastructure, defense, and various government projects. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on national priorities and infrastructure needs. This contract's value is moderate within the broader federal engineering services landscape.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting goals were established or met.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is a definitive contract, suggesting it is a standard agreement. Oversight will be critical to ensure the long duration does not lead to inefficiencies or cost overruns, and that the services meet the Army's evolving needs.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (2702 days) increases risk of obsolescence and cost overruns.
- No indication of small business participation.
- Vague description "35% package" requires further clarification.
- Potential for scope creep over an extended period.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, co, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.1 million to BENHAM-STANLEY, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF::A-E SERVICES CSOF 35% PACKAGE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BENHAM-STANLEY, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-05-08. End: 2026-09-30.
What specific engineering services are included in this "35% package" and how does the scope align with the long contract duration?
The term "35% package" likely refers to a specific phase or portion of a larger project, possibly indicating that this contract covers a significant but not the entirety of the engineering requirements. Understanding the precise deliverables and the rationale for the 2702-day duration is crucial to assess if the scope is appropriately matched to the timeline and budget, ensuring efficient use of funds and preventing potential overruns or underutilization.
Given the firm fixed price, what mechanisms are in place to manage potential cost increases due to unforeseen technical challenges or changes in material/labor costs over 2702 days?
While a firm fixed price contract aims to cap costs, long-term contracts are susceptible to external economic factors. The government should have contingency plans or contract clauses addressing significant unforeseen issues, escalation clauses for specific inputs if applicable, and robust change order processes. Effective project management and regular performance reviews are essential to mitigate risks associated with long-term fixed-price agreements.
How will the Department of the Army ensure the engineering services remain relevant and effective throughout the 2702-day contract period, considering technological advancements?
Ensuring relevance over such a long period requires proactive contract management. The Army should implement regular reviews of technological advancements and industry best practices. Contract modifications, if necessary, should be carefully managed through the established change order process. Performance metrics should be adaptable to evolving standards, and the government should maintain open communication with the contractor to foster innovation and ensure the services continue to meet mission requirements effectively.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 9400 N BROADWAY STE 300, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, 73114
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,092,713
Exercised Options: $15,092,713
Current Obligation: $15,092,713
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 1
Total Subaward Amount: $144,012
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-05-08
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-10-28
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)