DoD Awards $19M for 13th CAB Complex Roadway and Utilities to Loyd Contracting

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,064,087 ($19.1M)

Contractor: Loyd Contracting CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-08-07

End Date: 2014-09-19

Contract Duration: 773 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: M-PROJECT NO.: 336561--13TH CAB COMPLEX, PRIMARY CAB ROADWAY AND UTILITIES

Place of Performance

Location: COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80902

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.1 million to LOYD CONTRACTING CO., INC. for work described as: M-PROJECT NO.: 336561--13TH CAB COMPLEX, PRIMARY CAB ROADWAY AND UTILITIES Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Loyd Contracting Co., Inc. for $19.06 million focuses on primary roadway and utilities for the 13th CAB Complex. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a deliberate but potentially limited bidding process. 3. The project falls under 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction', a sector often subject to significant cost fluctuations and delays. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs, but the duration of 773 days indicates a complex undertaking.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $19.06 million for heavy civil engineering construction appears within a reasonable range for a project of this scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar military infrastructure projects would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This method implies that while open to all, specific sources might have been excluded, potentially impacting the breadth of competition and price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The $19.06 million expenditure represents taxpayer investment in critical military infrastructure. The firm-fixed-price contract aims to ensure cost certainty, but the project's complexity and duration warrant close monitoring to prevent cost overruns.

Public Impact

Enhances critical infrastructure at the 13th CAB Complex, supporting military operations. The project's success impacts the readiness and operational capabilities of the assigned military units. Construction activities may cause temporary disruptions to local traffic and access around the military installation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for scope creep given the project's complexity and duration.
  • Risk of unforeseen site conditions impacting schedule and cost.
  • Reliance on a single contractor for a significant infrastructure project.

Positive Signals

  • Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
  • Project addresses essential infrastructure needs for military readiness.
  • Awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a focus on defense infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This project falls under the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' sector (NAICS 237990). Spending in this sector is often project-specific and influenced by government infrastructure needs, defense spending priorities, and economic conditions. Benchmarks are difficult without specific project details.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that Loyd Contracting Co., Inc. is the sole awardee, and there is no explicit mention of small business participation or subcontracting goals. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved in the bidding process or will be utilized during project execution.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Army is responsible for oversight. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests a degree of accountability for the contractor to deliver within the agreed budget. However, the long duration necessitates diligent monitoring to ensure progress and adherence to specifications.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Limited competition due to source exclusion.
  • Long project duration increases risk of delays and cost escalation.
  • Potential for unforeseen site conditions in heavy civil construction.
  • Lack of explicit small business participation noted.

Tags

other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, co, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.1 million to LOYD CONTRACTING CO., INC.. M-PROJECT NO.: 336561--13TH CAB COMPLEX, PRIMARY CAB ROADWAY AND UTILITIES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOYD CONTRACTING CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-08-07. End: 2014-09-19.

What specific factors led to the exclusion of certain sources in the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method, and how did this impact the final contract price?

The exclusion of sources typically occurs when specific technical capabilities, past performance, or security clearances are required that only a subset of potential bidders possess. This can limit competition, potentially leading to higher prices than a truly unrestricted open competition. Understanding the exact criteria for exclusion is crucial to assess if the government received the best possible value.

What are the key performance indicators and milestones for this project, and what mechanisms are in place to track progress and mitigate risks associated with the 773-day duration?

Effective oversight would involve detailed project schedules, regular progress reports, site inspections, and defined milestones. Risk mitigation strategies should address potential delays from weather, material availability, or unforeseen site conditions. The contract likely includes clauses for managing changes and addressing performance issues to ensure timely and cost-effective completion.

How does the $19.06 million cost compare to similar roadway and utility construction projects at other military installations, considering factors like location, scope, and complexity?

A comprehensive cost comparison would require analyzing data from comparable projects, adjusting for regional economic differences, inflation, and specific project requirements. Without such detailed comparative analysis, it's challenging to definitively state if this award represents optimal value. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests an effort to contain costs within the awarded sum.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W9128F12B0010

Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3838 S. HOPKINS AVENUE, TITUSVILLE, FL, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Emerging Small Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,064,087

Exercised Options: $19,064,087

Current Obligation: $19,064,087

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 44

Total Subaward Amount: $79,756,985

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-08-07

Current End Date: 2014-09-19

Potential End Date: 2014-09-19 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-09-09

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending