DoD awards $12.3M for Computer Facilities Management Services to CTSC, LLC, with no competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,295,839 ($12.3M)

Contractor: Ctsc, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-05-22

End Date: 2007-03-31

Contract Duration: 313 days

Daily Burn Rate: $39.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Place of Performance

Location: PURCELLVILLE, LOUDOUN County, VIRGINIA, 20132

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.3 million to CTSC, LLC for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $12.3 million awarded. 2. Sole-source award to CTSC, LLC indicates limited competition. 3. Contract duration of 313 days suggests a short-term need. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $12.3 million for 313 days is substantial. Without a competitive process, it's difficult to assess if this pricing is optimal compared to market rates for similar Computer Facilities Management Services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning there was no competition. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about potential overspending and inefficient use of taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have paid more than necessary due to the sole-source award. Limited transparency in the procurement process. Potential for reduced service quality if the contractor faced no competitive pressure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • No small business participation

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed price contract

Sector Analysis

Computer Facilities Management Services fall under the IT sector. Spending benchmarks for this category vary widely based on scope and duration, but a $12.3 million award for less than a year warrants scrutiny for competitive sourcing.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract did not involve small business participation. This is a missed opportunity to support small businesses and potentially leverage their agility and innovation.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award suggests a potential lack of robust oversight in the initial procurement decision. Further review would be needed to understand the justification for not competing.

Related Government Programs

  • Computer Facilities Management Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • No small business participation
  • Potential for overpricing
  • Limited transparency

Tags

computer-facilities-management-services, department-of-defense, va, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.3 million to CTSC, LLC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CTSC, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-05-22. End: 2007-03-31.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves circumstances where only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. This could be due to unique capabilities, urgent needs, or specific government property requirements. Without further documentation, the exact reason remains unclear, but it bypasses the standard competitive process.

What is the risk associated with a sole-source contract of this value?

The primary risk with a sole-source contract of this magnitude is the potential for inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure. It also limits the government's ability to explore innovative solutions or potentially better-value offerings from other qualified vendors, leading to suboptimal resource allocation.

How effective is a sole-source award in ensuring optimal service delivery for Computer Facilities Management?

Sole-source awards can be effective if the selected contractor possesses unique, indispensable capabilities. However, without competition, there's less incentive for the contractor to continuously improve service quality or efficiency. Effectiveness is highly dependent on the contractor's inherent quality and the government's contract management.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Facilities Management Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: THE Chenega Corporation (UEI: 622692994)

Address: 5971 KINGSTOWNE VILLAGE PR, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-05-22

Current End Date: 2007-03-31

Potential End Date: 2007-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-03-21

More Contracts from Ctsc, LLC

View all Ctsc, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending