DoD Awards $14.2M Baker Laboratory Renovation to Nakaya Construction Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,219,930 ($14.2M)
Contractor: Nakaya Construction, L.L.C
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-08-18
End Date: 2010-09-30
Contract Duration: 773 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: RENOVATION OF THE BAKER LABORATORY FACILITY
Place of Performance
Location: DUGWAY, TOOELE County, UTAH, 84022
State: Utah Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.2 million to NAKAYA CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C for work described as: RENOVATION OF THE BAKER LABORATORY FACILITY Key points: 1. Contract awarded for facility renovation, indicating infrastructure investment. 2. Nakaya Construction, L.L.C. secured the contract. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 4. Project duration spans over two years, suggesting a significant scope. 5. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $14.2M for a laboratory renovation is difficult to benchmark without specific project details. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts risk to the contractor.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests an initial restriction or specific requirement that limited the pool of bidders, potentially impacting price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for this renovation, with the effectiveness of competition in achieving a fair price being a key consideration.
Public Impact
Renovation of a key laboratory facility, potentially impacting research or operational capabilities. Investment in infrastructure by the Department of Defense. Job creation and economic activity in Utah through construction services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition method may have reduced price competitiveness.
- Lack of specific details on the renovation scope makes value assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under a competitive process, indicating some level of market engagement.
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Sector Analysis
The Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector involves significant government spending on infrastructure and facility upgrades. Benchmarks vary widely based on project complexity and location.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors in this award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically involve contract management by the Department of the Army to ensure project completion according to specifications and budget.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition pool due to source exclusion.
- Lack of detailed scope for value assessment.
- Potential for higher costs due to restricted competition.
- Long project duration (773 days) increases risk of cost overruns or delays.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ut, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.2 million to NAKAYA CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. RENOVATION OF THE BAKER LABORATORY FACILITY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NAKAYA CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-08-18. End: 2010-09-30.
What specific factors led to the exclusion of sources in the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' method, and how did this impact the final price?
The exclusion of sources likely stemmed from specific technical requirements, security clearances, or unique capabilities needed for the Baker Laboratory renovation. This limitation could have reduced the number of potential bidders, potentially leading to a higher price than if the competition had been entirely unrestricted. Further investigation into the solicitation documents would clarify the exact reasons and their pricing implications.
What is the estimated value of the renovation work per square foot or per functional unit, and how does it compare to similar laboratory renovation projects?
Without detailed project specifications, such as square footage, scope of work (e.g., HVAC, electrical, specialized equipment installation), and the specific type of laboratory, a meaningful per-unit cost benchmark is not feasible. Comparing this $14.2 million project to similar DoD or institutional laboratory renovations would require access to detailed cost breakdowns and project scopes to ensure an apples-to-apples comparison.
How effectively did the chosen procurement strategy ensure the government received the best value for taxpayer dollars in renovating the Baker Laboratory?
The effectiveness of the procurement strategy in delivering best value is contingent on the justification for excluding sources and the subsequent bidding process. While 'full and open competition after exclusion' implies some competition, the initial exclusion may have limited the pool. A thorough review of the bid analysis, contractor performance, and final project outcomes against the initial objectives would be necessary to definitively assess the value achieved.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W911S608R0007
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2179 CLAREMONT DR, BOUNTIFUL, UT, 02
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Emerging Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $14,219,930
Exercised Options: $14,219,930
Current Obligation: $14,219,930
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-08-18
Current End Date: 2010-09-30
Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-07-21
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)