DOD Awards $50.7M for Al-Qassim Ranges Construction, Full Competition Used

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $50,743,479 ($50.7M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-12-24

End Date: 2020-01-31

Contract Duration: 2,229 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF AL-QASSIM RANGES PROJECT

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $50.7 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF AL-QASSIM RANGES PROJECT Key points: 1. Significant investment in construction infrastructure for military ranges. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Long contract duration (2013-2020) may indicate complex project scope. 4. No small business participation noted, potentially limiting broader economic impact.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $50.7M for heavy engineering construction is substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale military construction projects would be necessary to fully assess value, but the fixed-price nature aims to control costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery, allowing multiple bidders to submit proposals. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing compared to limited or sole-source approaches.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for defense infrastructure. The competitive nature of the award is intended to ensure efficient use of these funds, though the total cost is significant.

Public Impact

Enhances military training capabilities through improved range infrastructure. Supports the Department of Defense's operational readiness and strategic objectives. Potential for job creation within the construction sector, though specific impact is unclear. Long-term asset for national defense, requiring ongoing maintenance and operational planning.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of small business participation.
Long contract duration could mask cost overruns or scope creep.
Geographic location of project may present logistical challenges.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition utilized.
Firm fixed-price contract type.
Clear end-user agency (Department of the Army).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under heavy and civil engineering construction, a sector critical for infrastructure development. Spending benchmarks for similar large-scale military construction projects would provide context for the $50.7M award.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates no small business participation (ss=false, sb=false). This suggests that the prime contractor was not a small business, and potentially no small businesses were involved as subcontractors, missing an opportunity to support smaller enterprises.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract management teams ensuring performance and adherence to terms, with potential for IG reviews.

Related Government Programs

Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration.
No small business participation.
Potential for scope creep in large construction projects.
Geographic location and associated logistical challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $50.7 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. IGF::OT::IGF AL-QASSIM RANGES PROJECT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $50.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-12-24. End: 2020-01-31.

What was the competitive landscape like for this full and open solicitation, and did the number of bids received align with expectations for a project of this scale?

While the contract was awarded under full and open competition, the data does not specify the number of bids received. A thorough analysis would require examining the solicitation details to understand if the bidding process was robust and if the number of offers was sufficient to ensure competitive pricing. This information is crucial for validating the effectiveness of the competition strategy.

Given the long duration and significant value, what were the primary risk mitigation strategies employed in the firm fixed-price contract to prevent cost overruns or scope creep?

The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type itself is a primary risk mitigation tool, shifting cost overrun risk to the contractor. However, for a project spanning several years, additional measures like detailed milestone payments tied to verifiable progress, strict change order controls, and robust quality assurance oversight would be essential to manage scope creep and ensure the project stays within budget.

How effectively did this construction project contribute to the stated mission of the Department of the Army, and what metrics were used to assess its success beyond project completion?

The effectiveness of the Al-Qassim Ranges Project would be measured by its contribution to the Army's training readiness and operational capabilities. Success metrics could include the usability and functionality of the completed ranges, their capacity to support advanced training scenarios, and any reported improvements in soldier proficiency or mission accomplishment directly attributable to the new facilities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1275 FIRST ST NE, WASHINGTON, DC, 20417

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $50,743,479

Exercised Options: $50,743,479

Current Obligation: $50,743,479

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline