DoD's $24M Night Eagle Bridge Contract Awarded to Leidos, Inc. with No Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,985,736 ($24.0M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-09-28
End Date: 2012-09-26
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $65.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: NIGHT EAGLE BRIDGE
Place of Performance
Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.0 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: NIGHT EAGLE BRIDGE Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Leidos, Inc. for $23.99M. 2. Engineering services procured by the Department of the Army. 3. Contract was not competed, raising potential value concerns. 4. The IT sector is a significant area of federal spending.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's value of $23.99M for engineering services is difficult to assess without competitive benchmarks. The lack of competition suggests potential overpricing or a lack of market research.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive process.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for this $23.99M contract means taxpayers may not have received the best possible price for engineering services.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the absence of competitive bidding. Lack of transparency in the procurement process. Potential for reduced innovation and service quality without market pressure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpricing
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded to a known entity (Leidos, Inc.)
- Specific engineering services procured
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under engineering services, a critical component of the IT sector. Federal spending in IT services is substantial, and competitive procurement is crucial for cost-effectiveness.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded to a small business, and the sole-source nature further limits opportunities for small business participation in this specific procurement.
Oversight & Accountability
The lack of competition warrants further review to ensure the government received fair value and that the sole-source justification was robust.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited transparency
- No small business participation
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.0 million to LEIDOS, INC.. NIGHT EAGLE BRIDGE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-09-28. End: 2012-09-26.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and was adequate market research conducted to ensure fair pricing?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or a lack of available sources. Without specific details on the justification for the Night Eagle Bridge contract, it's impossible to definitively assess the market research. However, the absence of competition inherently raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best value and if alternative solutions were thoroughly explored.
What are the potential risks associated with awarding a $24M engineering services contract without competition?
The primary risks include inflated costs due to the absence of competitive pressure, potential for substandard quality if the contractor faces no market accountability, and a missed opportunity to foster innovation or discover more cost-effective solutions from a wider range of providers. This can lead to inefficient use of taxpayer funds and potentially less optimal project outcomes.
How effective is the Department of the Army in ensuring value for money when using sole-source contracts for engineering services?
The effectiveness of sole-source contracting for value for money is highly variable and depends on robust internal controls, stringent justification requirements, and effective negotiation strategies. While sole-source awards can be necessary in specific circumstances, they generally carry a higher risk of inefficiency compared to competitive processes. Consistent oversight and a commitment to exploring competition whenever feasible are key to maximizing effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W909MY11RZ316
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 11951 FREEDOM DR, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,985,736
Exercised Options: $23,985,736
Current Obligation: $23,985,736
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 21
Total Subaward Amount: $8,530,492
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-09-28
Current End Date: 2012-09-26
Potential End Date: 2012-09-26 12:09:00
Last Modified: 2018-08-24
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)