Leidos awarded $14.78M for Bradley trainer tech refreshes and upgrades by Department of the Army
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,776,460 ($14.8M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-01-25
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,709 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: PRODUCTION, TESTING, DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION OF TECH REFRESHES TO EXISTING SYSTEMS AND CONCURRENCY UPGRADES TO THE BRADLEY CONDUCT OF FIRE TRAINER
Place of Performance
Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.8 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: PRODUCTION, TESTING, DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION OF TECH REFRESHES TO EXISTING SYSTEMS AND CONCURRENCY UPGRADES TO THE BRADLEY CONDUCT OF FIRE TRAINER Key points: 1. Contract focuses on modernizing critical training systems for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. 2. The award represents a significant investment in maintaining and enhancing combat readiness. 3. Fixed-price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government. 4. The duration of the contract (over 4 years) indicates a long-term need for these upgrades. 5. This award falls within the broader category of defense readiness and modernization spending. 6. The specific NAICS code points to machinery manufacturing, highlighting the hardware aspect of the upgrades.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $14.78 million for technology refreshes and concurrency upgrades to a complex training system like the Bradley Conduct of Fire Trainer appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar defense training system modernization contracts is challenging without more specific data on the scope of 'tech refreshes' and 'concurrency upgrades'. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost predictability. The award amount is not exceptionally large, suggesting a focused scope of work rather than a complete system overhaul.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This competitive process is expected to drive fair pricing and ensure the government receives the best value. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and higher quality services, maximizing the return on investment for defense modernization efforts.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are U.S. Army personnel who will receive enhanced and more realistic training on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. The services delivered include the production, testing, delivery, and installation of technology refreshes and upgrades to existing training systems. The geographic impact is likely concentrated at Army training facilities where these trainers are deployed. Workforce implications include potential demand for specialized technicians for installation and maintenance, as well as roles within Leidos for engineering and manufacturing.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if 'tech refreshes' are not clearly defined.
- Dependence on Leidos for specialized knowledge of the Bradley trainer systems.
- Risk of integration challenges with existing legacy systems.
- Long contract duration could lead to obsolescence of some upgraded components if not managed proactively.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract mitigates cost overrun risks for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
- Focus on upgrading existing systems leverages prior investments.
- Award to an established defense contractor like Leidos implies a degree of reliability and experience.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the defense sector, specifically focusing on simulation and training systems. The market for defense simulation and training is substantial, driven by the need for realistic and cost-effective training solutions that reduce reliance on live-fire exercises. Companies like Leidos are key players in this space, providing advanced technological solutions to military branches. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and adapting to evolving combat environments.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false, and there is no specific mention of small business set-asides. This suggests the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist within Leidos's supply chain, but this is not explicitly detailed in the provided information. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific award appears minimal based on the data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring Leidos to deliver specified upgrades within the agreed budget. Transparency is facilitated through contract award announcements and reporting mechanisms within the federal procurement system. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Bradley Fighting Vehicle Systems
- Military Training Simulators
- Defense Readiness Programs
- Army Combat Systems Modernization
- Simulation and Training Technology
Risk Flags
- Potential for technological obsolescence due to long contract duration.
- Integration challenges with existing legacy training infrastructure.
- Scope definition clarity for 'tech refreshes' and 'concurrency upgrades'.
Tags
defense, department-of-the-army, simulation-and-training, technology-refresh, concurrency-upgrade, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, leidos-inc, bradley-fighting-vehicle, training-systems, machinery-manufacturing, virginia
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.8 million to LEIDOS, INC.. PRODUCTION, TESTING, DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION OF TECH REFRESHES TO EXISTING SYSTEMS AND CONCURRENCY UPGRADES TO THE BRADLEY CONDUCT OF FIRE TRAINER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-01-25. End: 2026-09-30.
What is the specific scope of the 'tech refreshes' and 'concurrency upgrades' for the Bradley Conduct of Fire Trainer?
The provided data does not detail the specific technical scope of the 'tech refreshes' and 'concurrency upgrades'. 'Tech refreshes' generally imply updating hardware and software components to more current versions to maintain performance and security, and to address obsolescence. 'Concurrency upgrades' could refer to enhancements that allow multiple trainers to operate together, simulate more complex scenarios simultaneously, or improve the fidelity of the simulation to match current battlefield conditions. A deeper dive into the contract statement of work (SOW) or technical exhibits would be necessary to understand the precise nature and extent of these upgrades.
How does the $14.78 million contract value compare to historical spending on Bradley trainer maintenance and upgrades?
Without access to historical spending data specifically for the Bradley Conduct of Fire Trainer maintenance and upgrades, a direct comparison is not possible. However, $14.78 million over approximately four years (January 2022 to September 2026) suggests an average annual spend of roughly $3.7 million. This figure needs to be contextualized against the complexity of the system, the number of trainers fielded, and the rate of technological advancement. It is a moderate investment, likely focused on specific modernization efforts rather than a complete overhaul or replacement of the training system fleet.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or acceptance criteria for the delivered technology refreshes and upgrades?
The provided summary data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or acceptance criteria for this contract. Typically, for such a contract, KPIs would relate to the successful integration of new hardware/software, achievement of specified performance levels (e.g., simulation fidelity, system uptime, processing speed), successful completion of testing phases (e.g., factory acceptance testing, site acceptance testing), and adherence to delivery schedules. The contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and associated inspection and acceptance clauses would outline these requirements in detail.
What is Leidos's track record with similar defense simulation and training system contracts?
Leidos, Inc. has a significant track record in providing advanced technology solutions and services to the U.S. military, including in the areas of simulation and training. They have been involved in developing and maintaining complex systems for various platforms. While specific details on their performance for the Bradley Conduct of Fire Trainer are not in the summary, Leidos's broader experience suggests capability in managing such technology refresh and upgrade projects. Their history includes work on sophisticated training environments, command and control systems, and integrated logistics support, indicating a strong foundation for executing this contract.
Are there any identified risks associated with the long contract duration (over 4 years) for technology upgrades?
Yes, a contract duration of over four years for technology upgrades carries inherent risks. One primary risk is technological obsolescence; the technology implemented early in the contract might be outdated by the time the contract concludes, especially in rapidly evolving fields like electronics and software. Another risk is the potential for the contractor's focus to wane over time, or for key personnel to depart, impacting project momentum. Furthermore, the longer the duration, the greater the chance of unforeseen changes in military requirements or budget constraints that could necessitate contract modifications or even termination. Proactive contract management, clear milestones, and flexibility clauses are crucial to mitigate these risks.
What is the estimated impact of these upgrades on the realism and effectiveness of Bradley crew training?
The upgrades are expected to significantly enhance the realism and effectiveness of Bradley crew training. By refreshing technology and implementing concurrency upgrades, the trainers can likely simulate more modern battlefield environments, incorporate updated threat representations, and provide more accurate weapon system feedback. This leads to more immersive training experiences, better skill development, and improved crew coordination. Enhanced realism allows trainees to better prepare for the complexities and stresses of actual combat operations, ultimately improving crew survivability and mission success rates.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing › Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W900KK21R0055
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Address: 1750 PRESIDENTS ST, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,480,247
Exercised Options: $14,776,460
Current Obligation: $14,776,460
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 19
Total Subaward Amount: $19,361,899
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W900KK22D0004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-01-25
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-31
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)