DoD's $47.4M Contract for AFCTC-3 Hardware/Software Awarded to Leidos Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $47,448,545 ($47.4M)
Contractor: Leidos Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-12-01
End Date: 2015-05-30
Contract Duration: 1,641 days
Daily Burn Rate: $28.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: AFCTC-3 HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE
Place of Performance
Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $47.4 million to LEIDOS INC for work described as: AFCTC-3 HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE Key points: 1. Leidos Inc. secured a significant $47.4 million contract for AFCTC-3 hardware and software. 2. The contract falls under the 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing' NAICS code. 3. Awarded by the Department of Defense, this contract highlights spending in the defense sector. 4. The firm fixed-price contract type suggests a defined scope and cost structure.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value is substantial, but without specific unit details or comparable contract data, a precise value assessment is difficult. The firm fixed-price nature provides some cost certainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a limited source selection. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs compared to a competitive process.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are committed to a sole-source award, emphasizing the need for robust justification and oversight to ensure fair pricing.
Public Impact
Significant taxpayer investment in defense technology infrastructure. Potential for increased costs due to lack of competitive bidding. Impact on the defense industrial base and specific technology development.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpayment due to sole-source award
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty
- Award to established contractor (Leidos Inc.)
Sector Analysis
This contract is within the defense sector, specifically related to machinery manufacturing for commercial and service industries. Defense spending benchmarks often show significant investment in specialized hardware and software for operational needs.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific provisions or awards to small businesses under this contract, suggesting it was primarily awarded to a large prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'VA' status and 'DEFINITIVE CONTRACT' type suggest a formal agreement, but further details on oversight mechanisms and performance monitoring would be needed to assess accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pricing.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown hinders value assessment.
- Potential for cost overruns without competitive pressure.
- Need for clear performance metrics and validation.
Tags
other-commercial-and-service-industry-ma, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $47.4 million to LEIDOS INC. AFCTC-3 HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $47.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-12-01. End: 2015-05-30.
What specific hardware and software components are included in the AFCTC-3 system, and how do their costs align with market rates?
The provided data lacks specifics on the AFCTC-3 components. A detailed breakdown of hardware and software, including specifications and quantities, is necessary to compare costs against industry benchmarks and assess value for money. Without this, it's difficult to determine if the $47.4 million represents a fair price.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a limited/non-competitive basis, and what risks does this pose to cost control?
The justification for a limited competition is crucial. If based on unique capabilities or proprietary technology, it might be warranted. However, non-competitive awards inherently increase the risk of inflated pricing and reduced innovation, as the contractor faces less pressure to optimize costs and performance.
How will the performance and effectiveness of the AFCTC-3 hardware and software be measured and validated to ensure it meets DoD requirements?
Measuring performance requires clearly defined metrics and acceptance criteria within the contract. The Department of Defense must have robust testing and validation processes in place to ensure the delivered hardware and software function as intended and meet operational needs. Regular performance reviews are essential.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing › Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Address: 1710 SAIC DR, MC LEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $47,572,520
Exercised Options: $47,448,545
Current Obligation: $47,448,545
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 104
Total Subaward Amount: $13,215,671
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-12-01
Current End Date: 2015-05-30
Potential End Date: 2015-05-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-01
More Contracts from Leidos Inc
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)