Leidos awarded $10.2M for support maintenance services, a contract with a 3-year duration
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,200,997 ($10.2M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-11-23
End Date: 2010-04-30
Contract Duration: 889 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SERVICE
Place of Performance
Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22041
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.2 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SERVICE Key points: 1. The contract's value of $10.2 million over approximately three years suggests a moderate annual spend. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract are not detailed, but the award type indicates a competitive process. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type generally offers cost certainty for the government. 4. Performance context is limited to the service type: support maintenance. 5. This contract falls under administrative management and general management consulting services. 6. The contract was awarded to Leidos, Inc., a significant federal contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking this $10.2 million contract against similar support maintenance services is challenging without more specific details on the scope of work and deliverables. The annual value, approximately $3.4 million, appears moderate for a federal contract of this nature. However, without comparative data on per-unit costs or service levels, a definitive value-for-money assessment is difficult. The firm-fixed-price structure provides budget predictability, which is a positive aspect.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. While the number of bidders is not specified, this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The agency sought proposals from a wide range of potential contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it is intended to drive down costs through market forces and encourage innovation among bidders.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely Department of the Army personnel and operations requiring support maintenance services. The services delivered are crucial for the ongoing functionality and maintenance of specific systems or equipment. The geographic impact is centered within the Department of the Army's operational areas, likely within Virginia where the contractor is located. Workforce implications may include the employment of technical staff by Leidos to fulfill the contract requirements.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess service quality.
- Limited information on the specific nature of 'support maintenance' could hide potential scope creep.
- The contract duration of approximately three years may not align with long-term strategic needs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Leidos, Inc. is an established contractor with experience in federal service delivery.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically under administrative management and general management consulting services. The federal market for IT support and maintenance is substantial, with numerous contracts awarded annually. Leidos, Inc. is a major player in this space, often competing for and winning large-scale government contracts. Benchmarking this specific award requires comparison to similar maintenance and support contracts within the defense sector.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific benefits for the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular award. The prime contractor, Leidos, Inc., is a large business, and the contract was competed broadly.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price structure, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award data being publicly available, though detailed performance reports are usually internal.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Logistics Agency Support Contracts
- Army IT Services Contracts
- General Management Consulting Services
- Maintenance and Repair Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for undefined scope in 'support maintenance' under FFP.
- Limited transparency on the number of bidders in the competitive process.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes outcome assessment difficult.
Tags
defense, department-of-the-army, support-maintenance, administrative-management-consulting, general-management-consulting, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, leidos-inc, virginia, moderate-value
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.2 million to LEIDOS, INC.. SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SERVICE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-11-23. End: 2010-04-30.
What is Leidos, Inc.'s track record with similar support maintenance contracts within the Department of Defense?
Leidos, Inc. has a significant history of performing support maintenance and related services for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. Their portfolio often includes complex IT infrastructure, logistics, and operational support. Analyzing their past performance on similar firm-fixed-price contracts would involve reviewing contract histories for on-time delivery, quality of service, and any reported disputes or contract modifications. Their established presence suggests a capacity to handle such requirements, but specific performance on comparable contracts would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and efficiency in this domain.
How does the $10.2 million value compare to other support maintenance contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?
The $10.2 million total value for this contract, spanning approximately three years, translates to an average annual value of roughly $3.4 million. This figure is considered moderate within the context of large federal IT and support services spending. The Department of the Army awards numerous contracts, many of which are significantly larger, particularly those involving major system sustainment or large-scale IT infrastructure. However, numerous smaller, specialized support contracts also exist. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to analyze the scope and duration of other 'support maintenance' contracts awarded by the Army, filtering for similar service types and contract vehicles.
What are the primary risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for support maintenance?
The primary risk with a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract for support maintenance lies in potential scope definition issues. If the scope of 'support maintenance' is not precisely defined, the contractor (Leidos) might face unforeseen work, potentially leading to requests for equitable adjustments or disputes. Conversely, the government risks receiving only the minimum required services if the SOW is too narrowly defined. For the contractor, underestimating the effort required for maintenance could lead to reduced profit margins. Effective risk mitigation relies on a clear, detailed Statement of Work (SOW) and robust contract administration.
How effective are 'full and open competition' awards in ensuring optimal value for taxpayer money in this service category?
Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring optimal value for taxpayer money, especially for services like administrative management and general management consulting. By allowing all responsible sources to compete, it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. This process helps ensure that the government receives the best possible combination of price and performance. While the number of bidders isn't specified here, the mechanism itself is designed to promote efficiency and cost-effectiveness, preventing sole-source situations that can lead to higher costs.
What is the historical spending trend for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' by the Department of the Army?
Historical spending by the Department of the Army on 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611) has been substantial and generally increasing over the past decade, reflecting a growing reliance on external expertise for various operational and strategic functions. This category encompasses a wide range of services, including process improvement, organizational development, and management support. While specific annual figures fluctuate based on agency priorities and budget allocations, the overall trend indicates a consistent demand for these services. Analyzing detailed historical data would reveal peaks and troughs related to specific initiatives or budget cycles.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 1710 SAIC DRIVE, ROOM #8031, MCLEAN, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,288,178
Exercised Options: $10,200,997
Current Obligation: $10,200,997
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F8006H
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-11-23
Current End Date: 2010-04-30
Potential End Date: 2010-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-06-11
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)