DoD's $12.2M contract for technical assistance to AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. awarded by the Army

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,238,836 ($12.2M)

Contractor: Axiom Resource Management, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-09-27

End Date: 2009-09-28

Contract Duration: 1,827 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200412!004587!2100!W81XWH!US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQ ACT!GS10F0065N !C!N! !Y!W81XWH04F0828! !20040927!20050928!002207459!002207459!002207459!N!AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC!5203 LEESBURG PIKE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22041!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALLS CHURCH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000001313594!N!N!000000000000!R421!TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22041

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.2 million to AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. for work described as: 200412!004587!2100!W81XWH!US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQ ACT!GS10F0065N !C!N! !Y!W81XWH04F0828! !20040927!20050928!002207459!002207459!002207459!N!AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC!5203 LEESBURG PIKE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22041!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALL… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for technical assistance services, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract was 1827 days, spanning over five years. 4. The primary place of performance was Falls Church, Virginia. 5. The contract falls under administrative management and general management consulting services. 6. The contractor, AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC., has a significant federal contract history.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $12.2 million for a contract spanning over five years suggests a moderate annual expenditure. Benchmarking this against similar technical assistance contracts within the Department of Defense is challenging without more specific service details. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the government aimed to control costs upfront. Further analysis would require comparing the specific deliverables and outcomes against industry standards for management consulting services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but this method of procurement generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality for the government. The open competition suggests that the Army sought the best value proposition from a wide range of potential contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a competitive bidding process, ensuring that the government receives services at a fair market price.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Army, which receives technical assistance to support its operations. The services delivered are categorized under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting. The contract's place of performance is Falls Church, Virginia, potentially impacting the local economy through employment and business activity. The contract supports the Army's mission-critical functions by providing specialized expertise.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true value and effectiveness of the technical assistance provided.
The extended duration of the contract could lead to potential cost overruns if not managed diligently.
The broad category of 'technical assistance' may obscure the specific nature of services rendered, hindering detailed oversight.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded fair pricing.
The contract is a firm fixed-price type, which helps in budget predictability and cost control for the government.
The contractor, AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC., has a history of performing federal contracts, implying some level of established capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting various government functions. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. The $12.2 million award is a moderate-sized contract within this broad category, and its duration suggests a long-term need for the services provided by the Department of the Army.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus was on competition among all eligible sources. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award. The lack of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses to directly participate in this contract are limited unless they are part of a larger bid or subcontract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring and compliance checks are standard procedures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. Specific Inspector General (IG) involvement would depend on any reported issues of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract's execution.

Related Government Programs

Management and Consulting Services
Technical Support Services
Department of Defense Contracts
Army Procurement

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics.
Potential for scope creep over the contract's long duration.
Limited transparency on specific services rendered under 'technical assistance'.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.2 million to AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC.. 200412!004587!2100!W81XWH!US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQ ACT!GS10F0065N !C!N! !Y!W81XWH04F0828! !20040927!20050928!002207459!002207459!002207459!N!AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC!5203 LEESBURG PIKE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22041!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALLS CHURCH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000001313594!N!N!000000000000!R421!TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-27. End: 2009-09-28.

What specific technical assistance was provided under this contract, and what were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure success?

The provided data categorizes the service under 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611) and lists the description as 'TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE'. However, it does not detail the specific tasks performed or the KPIs established to evaluate the contractor's performance. Without this granular information, it is difficult to assess the effectiveness and value derived from the $12.2 million expenditure. Typically, such contracts would outline deliverables, milestones, and metrics related to the assistance provided, such as process improvements, strategic planning support, or operational efficiency enhancements. The absence of this detail limits a thorough assessment of the contract's impact and the contractor's success in meeting the Army's objectives.

How does the awarded amount of $12.2 million compare to the average cost of similar technical assistance contracts within the Department of Defense over the same period?

Benchmarking the $12.2 million award requires comparing it to similar technical assistance contracts awarded by the Department of Defense (DoD) between 2004 and 2009. The average cost for such contracts can vary significantly based on the scope of services, duration, and specific agency needs. Given that this contract lasted 1827 days (approximately 5 years), the average annual value is roughly $2.44 million. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to analyze a dataset of comparable DoD contracts from that era, filtering by service type (management consulting, technical assistance) and contract value range. Without access to such a comprehensive dataset, it's challenging to definitively state whether $12.2 million represents a high, low, or average expenditure for this type of service over a five-year period.

What is the track record of AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. in performing federal contracts, particularly those related to technical assistance and management consulting?

AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. has a history of receiving federal contracts, as indicated by its presence in the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). This specific contract, valued at $12.2 million and spanning over five years, suggests a significant engagement with the Department of the Army. A deeper analysis of their contract history would reveal the types of services they have provided, their performance ratings on past contracts (if available), and the agencies they have served. A positive track record, evidenced by successful past performance and positive feedback, would generally indicate reliability and capability. Conversely, any history of contract disputes, performance issues, or terminations would raise concerns about their ability to deliver effectively on future awards.

What were the primary risks identified for this contract, and what mitigation strategies were put in place by the contracting agency?

The provided data does not explicitly list identified risks or mitigation strategies for this contract. However, common risks associated with large, long-term technical assistance contracts include scope creep, contractor performance issues, cost overruns (though less likely with fixed-price contracts), and potential obsolescence of services if the technological or operational landscape changes rapidly. Mitigation strategies typically employed by agencies involve robust contract management, clear performance standards, regular progress reviews, and contingency planning. For this specific contract, the firm-fixed-price structure and full and open competition were likely intended to mitigate cost and ensure value, respectively. Further investigation into the contract's statement of work and any associated risk assessments would be necessary for a complete understanding.

How has federal spending on administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) trended over the past two decades, and where does this contract fit within that trend?

Federal spending on administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) has generally seen an upward trend over the past two decades, reflecting the increasing complexity of government operations and the need for specialized expertise. Agencies frequently contract out for services ranging from strategic planning and organizational development to IT consulting and human capital management. This $12.2 million contract, awarded in 2004, falls within this category and represents a significant, albeit singular, expenditure for the Department of the Army during that period. Its duration suggests a sustained need for such services. Analyzing broader spending trends would involve examining aggregate data for NAICS 541611 across all federal agencies over time to contextualize the size and significance of this particular award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5203 LEESBURG PIKE # 300, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,758,262

Exercised Options: $324,316

Current Obligation: $12,238,836

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0065N

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline