Army awards $16.7M contract for program management and support services to Axiom Resource Management

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,755,602 ($16.8M)

Contractor: Axiom Resource Management, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-09-27

End Date: 2009-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,828 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200412!004639!2100!W81XWH!US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQ ACT!GS10F0065N !C!N! !N!W81XWH04F0820! !20040927!20050929!002207459!002207459!002207459!N!AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC!5203 LEESBURG PIKE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22041!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALLS CHURCH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000001831122!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541910!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22041

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.8 million to AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. for work described as: 200412!004639!2100!W81XWH!US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQ ACT!GS10F0065N !C!N! !N!W81XWH04F0820! !20040927!20050929!002207459!002207459!002207459!N!AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC!5203 LEESBURG PIKE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22041!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALL… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for program management and support services, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. Axiom Resource Management, Inc. secured this contract, suggesting a track record in providing relevant services. 4. The contract duration of approximately five years (1828 days) points to a long-term need for these services. 5. The primary service category is Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a major component of the Department of Defense.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $16.7 million over nearly five years suggests a moderate annual spend for program management and support services. Benchmarking this against similar contracts would require access to a broader dataset of government procurements for comparable services and durations. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the government has a clear understanding of the expected costs and that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns. Without specific per-unit cost data or detailed service breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process is a positive indicator.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This typically leads to a wider range of proposals and potentially more competitive pricing. The fact that it was competed fully suggests that the Army did not perceive a need for sole-source or limited competition, which is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and encourage innovation from multiple vendors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and its research and acquisition programs, which receive essential program management and support. Services delivered include administrative management and general management consulting, crucial for the efficient operation of complex military research initiatives. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of the Army's operational sphere, with potential implications for personnel and resource allocation. Workforce implications may include the utilization of specialized project managers, analysts, and administrative staff, both within Axiom Resource Management and potentially within the Army units they support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if program management requirements are not clearly defined and monitored.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical program support could pose a risk if performance falters.
The fixed-price nature, while beneficial for cost control, could incentivize the contractor to minimize service levels if not adequately overseen.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
The contract is firm fixed price, providing cost certainty for the government.
Axiom Resource Management, Inc. has secured this contract, suggesting they meet the required qualifications.
The contract duration of nearly five years implies a stable, long-term need for these services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on management and consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions from administrative operations to complex program oversight. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in program management, strategic planning, and administrative support. The Army's spending in this area is consistent with its need to manage large-scale research, development, and acquisition programs effectively.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have been set aside for small businesses, nor is there an indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. The award to Axiom Resource Management, Inc., a single entity, suggests that the primary focus was on securing the necessary expertise through the most competitive means available. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were encouraged or mandated as part of the overall contract performance.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring, adherence to contract terms, and quality assurance would be key oversight functions. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which record award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Program Management Support
Army Research and Development Support Services
Administrative and Management Consulting Services
Federal Contract Management

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Service Category Specificity
Performance Metrics Clarity

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.8 million to AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC.. 200412!004639!2100!W81XWH!US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQ ACT!GS10F0065N !C!N! !N!W81XWH04F0820! !20040927!20050929!002207459!002207459!002207459!N!AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC!5203 LEESBURG PIKE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22041!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALLS CHURCH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000001831122!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541910!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-27. End: 2009-09-29.

What is Axiom Resource Management, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Axiom Resource Management, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily with the Department of Defense. While this specific award of $16.7 million for program management and support services is a notable contract, a comprehensive review of their past performance would involve examining all their federal awards. This includes analyzing contract types, agencies served, performance ratings (if available), and any history of contract modifications or disputes. Their ability to secure this contract suggests they have met the qualification criteria set forth by the Army. Further investigation into their contract portfolio could reveal expertise in specific areas relevant to Army operations and research.

How does the $16.7 million contract value compare to similar program management support contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?

The $16.7 million contract value for nearly five years of program management and support services represents a moderate annual expenditure, averaging around $3.34 million per year. To benchmark this effectively, one would need to compare it against a dataset of similar contracts awarded by the Department of the Army and other DoD components for comparable services (e.g., management consulting, program support, administrative services) over similar timeframes. Factors such as the specific scope of work, required expertise, and the number of bidders in those comparable contracts are crucial for a meaningful comparison. Without this broader context, it's difficult to definitively state whether this represents a particularly high or low value, but the competitive award process is a positive sign for value.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?

Key risks associated with this contract include potential performance issues if Axiom Resource Management fails to deliver the expected level of program management and support, scope creep if requirements are not well-defined, and potential over-reliance on a single contractor. Mitigation strategies likely include robust performance monitoring by the contracting officer's representative (COR), clearly defined deliverables and key performance indicators (KPIs) within the contract, and regular communication channels between the government and the contractor. The firm-fixed-price nature also shifts some financial risk to the contractor. Furthermore, the competitive award process itself can mitigate risks by selecting a contractor deemed most capable.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring value for money for this type of service?

The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered highly effective in ensuring value for money for services like program management and support. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions. This process encourages vendors to offer their best terms and pricing to win the contract. The Department of the Army's decision to use this method suggests they believe it will yield the best outcome for this specific requirement. The success of this approach is further supported by the firm-fixed-price contract type, which locks in costs.

What is the historical spending trend for program management and support services within the Department of the Army?

Historical spending trends for program management and support services within the Department of the Army are substantial, reflecting the complexity and scale of its operations, research, and acquisition programs. The Army consistently procures a wide range of support services, including administrative, management consulting, and program oversight, to ensure the efficient execution of its missions. While this specific $16.7 million award is a single data point, the overall trend indicates a continuous and significant investment in these services. Analyzing multi-year spending data for specific NAICS codes (like 541611 for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) would provide a clearer picture of budget allocations and fluctuations over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5203 LEESBURG PIKE # 300, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,623,816

Exercised Options: $4,033,602

Current Obligation: $16,755,602

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0065N

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline