DoD's $28M contract for public health administration programs awarded to EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,955,638 ($28.0M)
Contractor: Eagle Group International LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-08-15
End Date: 2010-08-21
Contract Duration: 1,832 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Healthcare
Place of Performance
Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22041
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $28.0 million to EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract value of $27.96 million over five years suggests a significant investment in public health administration. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract likely benefited from a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of 1832 days (approximately 5 years) indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The contract's focus on 'Administration of Public Health Programs' points to a critical support function within the Department of Defense. 5. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests the primary contractor is not a small business, and subcontracting opportunities may be limited. 6. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data. However, a $28 million award over five years for administrative support in public health programs indicates a substantial commitment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to control costs, but the overall value-for-money depends heavily on the efficiency and effectiveness of the services provided by EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' implying that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The fact that there were 2 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this contract. While two bidders are better than one, a higher number of bidders typically leads to more robust price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award, with two bidders, likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers than a sole-source or limited competition scenario.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely military personnel and their families who rely on public health programs administered under this contract. The contract supports the essential administrative functions required to deliver public health services within the Department of Defense. The geographic impact is likely widespread, covering areas where DoD personnel and their families receive health services. Workforce implications include the employment of individuals by EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC to perform administrative tasks related to public health programs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price contract does not adequately account for all potential service delivery challenges.
- Risk of service quality degradation if contractor performance is not rigorously monitored.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical administrative functions could pose a risk if the contractor faces financial or operational difficulties.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a structured procurement process.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type provides budget certainty for the government.
- Long contract duration suggests a stable, ongoing need for the services.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on administrative support for public health programs. This sector is crucial for government operations, enabling agencies to manage complex programs efficiently. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other administrative support contracts within the federal government, particularly those awarded by large agencies like the Department of Defense, to assess cost-effectiveness and pricing structures.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC. Consequently, the direct impact on small business prime contractors is likely minimal. However, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors to EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC, depending on the contractor's subcontracting plan and the nature of the services required.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and compliance checks are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Health Agency Contracts
- Federal Public Health Administration Services
- Medical and Health Services Contracts
- Government Administrative Support Services
Risk Flags
- Contract Duration
- Contract Value
- Competition Level
- Contract Type
Tags
department-of-defense, healthcare, administration, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, professional-services, public-health, army, virginia
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $28.0 million to EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-08-15. End: 2010-08-21.
What is the track record of EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC in performing similar federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?
Assessing the track record of EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC requires a detailed review of their past performance on federal contracts. This would involve examining contract histories for on-time delivery, quality of service, adherence to budget, and any past performance issues or disputes. Specifically for contracts related to public health administration or similar administrative support within the Department of Defense, their experience would be a key indicator of their capability. A review of their contract awards and terminations, along with any available past performance evaluations, would provide insight into their reliability and expertise in managing complex government programs.
How does the per-unit cost or overall value of this contract compare to similar public health administration contracts awarded by other federal agencies?
Directly comparing the value of this $27.96 million contract to similar public health administration contracts across federal agencies is difficult without specific performance metrics and service scope. However, a general benchmark can be established by looking at the average cost per administrative staff member or per program supported within the DoD and other agencies like HHS. If this contract supports a large number of personnel or programs, the overall value might be reasonable. A detailed analysis would involve normalizing costs based on the scope of services, geographic reach, and complexity of the programs administered to ensure a fair comparison and assess value for money.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Key risks for this contract include potential cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price (FFP) structure doesn't adequately cover unforeseen expenses, service quality degradation if performance is not rigorously monitored, and contractor performance issues (e.g., financial instability, key personnel loss). Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract surveillance by the government, clear performance standards and metrics, regular progress reviews, and contingency planning. The FFP nature itself is a risk mitigation for the government regarding cost certainty, but it places the cost risk on the contractor. Ensuring strong communication channels and having backup plans for critical functions are also vital.
How effective has EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC been in delivering services under this specific contract, based on available performance data?
Determining the effectiveness of EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC under this specific contract requires access to performance reports, quality assurance reviews, and potentially user feedback from the Department of the Army. Without this proprietary data, a definitive assessment is not possible. However, if the contract has been consistently renewed or extended, it may suggest satisfactory performance. Conversely, any documented issues, disputes, or corrective actions would indicate areas where effectiveness may be lacking. A comprehensive analysis would involve examining metrics related to timeliness, accuracy, compliance, and overall client satisfaction.
What have been the historical spending patterns for public health administration programs within the Department of Defense over the last 5-10 years?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for public health administration programs within the Department of Defense over the last 5-10 years would reveal trends in budget allocation, contract awards, and the types of services procured. This data could show whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable, and whether there has been a shift towards more outsourcing or in-house provision of services. Understanding these patterns helps contextualize the current $27.96 million award, indicating if it represents a typical investment or a significant deviation. It also highlights the sustained importance of these administrative functions to the DoD's mission.
Given the contract's duration and value, what are the potential long-term implications for the DoD's public health infrastructure and capabilities?
A five-year, $28 million contract for public health administration implies a strategic decision by the DoD to rely on external support for these critical functions over an extended period. The long-term implications could include a potential reduction in the DoD's organic capability to manage such programs internally, leading to increased dependence on contractors. While this can offer flexibility and access to specialized expertise, it also carries risks related to knowledge transfer, contractor lock-in, and potential cost increases upon contract renewal. Ensuring robust oversight and knowledge management practices will be crucial to maintain institutional capacity and control costs effectively in the long run.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Public Administration › Administration of Human Resource Programs › Administration of Public Health Programs
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 4751 BEST RD STE 300, ATLANTA, GA, 90
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-08-15
Current End Date: 2010-08-21
Potential End Date: 2010-08-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-10-09
More Contracts from Eagle Group International LLC
- 200407!000475!2100!w911se!aca, South Region Contracting Ct!dakf1199d0008 !A!N! !N!0052 ! !20040327!20040924!926881327!926881327!926881327!n!eagle Group International, INC!4751 Best Road !atlanta !ga!30337!31068!029!13!fort Stewart !bryan !georgia !+000005000000!n!n!000000000000!j023!maint & Repair of Eq/Vehicles-Trailers-Cycles !a4a!combat Vehicles !000 !* !811118!E! !5!B!M! !A!A!20040924!B! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!010!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !n!a!n!n!c! ! ! !A!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! !y!2100!aflg01!0001! ! — $138.2M (Department of Defense)
- TAS::21 2020::TAS 200607!600422!2100!w911se!aca, South Region Contracting Ct!gs10f0397n !C!N! !n!w911se06f0052! !20060329!20070228!926881327!926881327!926881327!n!eagle Group International, LLC!4751 Best RD STE 300 !atlanta !ga!30337!38964!179!13!hinesville !liberty !georgia !+000012190235!n!n!000000000000!j023!maint&repair of Eq/Vehicles-Trailers-Cycles !a4a!combat Vehicles !000 !* !811118!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !B!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !2100!W911SE!0001! ! — $107.5M (Department of Defense)
- Operation of JOB Corps Center — $80.1M (Department of Labor)
- Operation of Regional Training Site - Medical — $52.8M (Department of Defense)
- 200208!000414!2100!KF11 !army Atlanta Contracting Center !dakf1199d0008 !A!N! !N!003301 !20020415!20030228!926881327!926881327!926881327!n!eagle Group International, INC!4751 Best Road !atlanta !ga!30337!30928!121!13!fort Mcpherson !fulton !georgia !+000001813975!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541614!E! !5!b!m!b!a!a!20030228!b! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!010!k! !C!N!Z! ! !n!a!n!n!c! ! ! !d!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $49.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)