DoD awards $13.5M logistics support contract to Goldbelt Apex, LLC for BAMC, JBSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,544,042 ($13.5M)

Contractor: Goldbelt Apex, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-09-01

End Date: 2026-09-29

Contract Duration: 758 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 31

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES OF 108 FTES FOR BAMC, JBSA, FORT SAM HOUSTON, TX

Place of Performance

Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78234

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.5 million to GOLDBELT APEX, LLC for work described as: LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES OF 108 FTES FOR BAMC, JBSA, FORT SAM HOUSTON, TX Key points: 1. Contract provides essential logistics support services for 108 Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs). 2. Awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating clear cost expectations. 3. Competition was open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a deliberate procurement strategy. 4. Contract duration of 758 days covers a significant period of service delivery. 5. Geographic focus on Fort Sam Houston, Texas, highlights regional support needs. 6. The contract value is substantial, reflecting the scale of logistics operations required.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.54 million for 758 days of logistics support, encompassing 108 FTEs, appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale logistics support contracts within the Department of Defense is necessary for a definitive value assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This procurement method implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources may have been excluded for defined reasons, potentially limiting the number of bidders. The presence of 31 bids suggests a competitive process, but the exclusion criteria warrant further examination to ensure maximum value.

Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources, even with 31 bids, could potentially limit price competition and may not have resulted in the lowest possible price for taxpayers. A thorough review of the exclusion rationale is important.

Public Impact

Beneficiaries include military personnel and staff at Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) and Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA). Services delivered are critical for the operational readiness and efficiency of medical facilities. Geographic impact is concentrated at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, supporting a major military installation. Workforce implications include the direct employment of 108 FTEs managed by Goldbelt Apex, LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
Firm-fixed-price contracts can sometimes lead to less flexibility if requirements change significantly.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical logistics functions could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Award to a single entity streamlines management and accountability.
Clear contract duration and scope provide predictability for both parties.
The firm-fixed-price nature aligns costs with expected deliverables.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of maintaining operational readiness for military installations. The market for logistics and facilities support services for government entities is substantial, with numerous providers capable of fulfilling complex requirements. This specific award to Goldbelt Apex, LLC for BAMC represents a significant investment in ensuring the smooth functioning of a major medical and training hub.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false, and it is not a small business set-aside (ss). This suggests that the primary award was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within the scope of this larger contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting officers and program managers at JBSA. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring Goldbelt Apex, LLC to deliver specified logistics support. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases, though specific performance metrics and oversight reports may not be publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

Military Base Operations Support
Medical Facilities Management
Logistics and Supply Chain Services
Defense Health Agency Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to exclusion of sources.
Contract performance risk associated with contractor's track record.
Value for money assessment requires further benchmarking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.5 million to GOLDBELT APEX, LLC. LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES OF 108 FTES FOR BAMC, JBSA, FORT SAM HOUSTON, TX

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GOLDBELT APEX, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-01. End: 2026-09-29.

What is the track record of Goldbelt Apex, LLC in performing similar large-scale logistics support contracts for the Department of Defense?

Assessing Goldbelt Apex, LLC's track record requires a review of their past performance on similar contracts. This includes examining contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. Information on their experience with military medical facilities and the scale of FTE management is crucial. A positive history of delivering on time, within budget, and to required quality standards would indicate a lower performance risk for this new contract. Conversely, any significant past issues would raise concerns about their capability to meet the demands of supporting BAMC.

How does the awarded amount of $13.54 million compare to the estimated value or benchmark for similar logistics support services at large military installations?

To benchmark the $13.54 million award, one would compare it against historical contracts for logistics support at comparable military installations, considering factors like the number of FTEs supported, the duration of the contract, and the specific services provided. Data from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or other contract databases can reveal average costs per FTE or per day for similar services. If this contract's cost per FTE or per day is significantly higher than the average for similar services, it could indicate a potential overpayment or less competitive pricing. Conversely, if it aligns with or is below benchmarks, it suggests reasonable value for the services rendered.

What are the specific risks associated with the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' clause in this contract?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' clause introduces a nuanced risk. While it aims for broad competition, the 'exclusion of sources' implies that certain potential bidders were deliberately disqualified. The risk lies in understanding the justification for these exclusions. If the exclusions were based on legitimate, well-documented reasons (e.g., lack of specific capability, past performance issues), the competition might still be robust among the remaining eligible bidders. However, if the exclusions were arbitrary or poorly justified, it could artificially limit competition, potentially leading to higher prices and reduced innovation for the government. This clause necessitates careful scrutiny of the pre-award documentation to ensure fairness and optimal value.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the operational effectiveness of Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC)?

This contract is expected to have a significant positive impact on BAMC's operational effectiveness by ensuring the consistent and reliable provision of essential logistics support services. These services likely encompass a range of functions critical to a medical facility, such as supply chain management, equipment maintenance, facility upkeep, and potentially patient movement support. By outsourcing these functions to Goldbelt Apex, LLC, BAMC can focus its internal resources and personnel on its core mission of providing healthcare. The contract's duration and the specified number of FTEs suggest a comprehensive support package designed to maintain high operational standards and readiness within the medical center.

How has federal spending on logistics support services for military medical facilities evolved over the past five years, and where does this contract fit in?

Federal spending on logistics support services for military medical facilities has generally seen consistent investment, driven by the ongoing need to maintain readiness and operational efficiency across the Defense Health Agency (DHA) and its subordinate commands like BAMC. Over the past five years, there has been a trend towards consolidating support services to achieve economies of scale and improve management. This $13.54 million contract for BAMC fits within this trend, representing a significant, albeit localized, investment. Analyzing historical spending patterns for similar contracts at BAMC or other major military medical centers would reveal whether this award is in line with previous funding levels or represents an increase/decrease, potentially influenced by changing operational requirements or budget allocations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W81K0024R0006

Offers Received: 31

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5500 CHEROKEE AVE STE 100, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22312

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $41,541,761

Exercised Options: $17,399,376

Current Obligation: $13,544,042

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline