Leidos Inc. awarded $16.4M for Joint Doctrine Support Plan, highlighting administrative management consulting services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,375,883 ($16.4M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-01-25
End Date: 2010-10-01
Contract Duration: 1,710 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: JOINT DOCTRINE SUPPORT PLAN - TASK 1
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20301
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.4 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: JOINT DOCTRINE SUPPORT PLAN - TASK 1 Key points: 1. Contract value of $16.4M over 4 years suggests a significant investment in administrative and management consulting. 2. Full and open competition indicates a broad market search, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. The contract's duration of over 4 years implies a need for sustained support in doctrine development and management. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor, incentivizing efficient delivery. 5. The award to a single contractor, Leidos, Inc., warrants scrutiny for potential future sole-source awards. 6. Focus on administrative management and general management consulting services points to a need for organizational efficiency and strategic planning support.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $16.4 million over approximately four years averages to about $4.1 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale administrative and management consulting contracts for federal agencies, this figure appears within a reasonable range, especially considering the specialized nature of doctrine support. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the government has negotiated a set price, which can be advantageous if the contractor manages costs effectively. Without specific per-unit deliverables or detailed service breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process provides some assurance of fair pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that the Department of the Navy sought proposals from all responsible sources. The solicitation process likely involved a comprehensive review of technical capabilities and pricing from multiple interested parties. While the number of bidders is not specified, the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competitive environment, which typically drives down prices and encourages innovation. This approach is generally favored for ensuring the government receives the best possible value.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process maximizes the potential for taxpayer savings by encouraging a wide range of contractors to bid, thereby driving down costs through market forces.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy, benefits from enhanced administrative and management support for its doctrine development. Services delivered likely include research, analysis, writing, and coordination related to military doctrine. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of the Navy's operational and administrative centers, potentially nationwide or even globally. Workforce implications may involve specialized consultants and subject matter experts contributing to the development and refinement of military doctrine.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for contractor lock-in if performance is satisfactory and future needs align closely.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical doctrine support could pose a risk if the contractor faces financial or operational difficulties.
Positive Signals
- Award through full and open competition suggests a competitive process that likely secured favorable pricing.
- Firm fixed-price contract type transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor.
- The contractor, Leidos, Inc., is a large, established entity with significant experience in government contracting, suggesting a lower risk of performance failure.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is crucial for government operations, providing expertise in areas ranging from strategic planning to organizational efficiency. The market for such services is large and competitive, with numerous firms vying for federal contracts. The $16.4 million award is a significant, but not exceptionally large, contract within this domain, reflecting a focused need for specialized doctrine support within the Department of the Navy.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. Leidos, Inc. is a large business. Therefore, there is no direct set-aside for small businesses on this prime contract. However, it is possible that Leidos may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill certain aspects of the contract, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem. Further analysis would be needed to determine subcontracting plans and actual utilization of small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of the Navy. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and invoice review are standard oversight mechanisms. As a firm fixed-price contract, the primary accountability measure is the contractor's successful delivery of the agreed-upon services within the stipulated price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Doctrine Development Programs
- Military Strategy and Planning Support Services
- Federal Management Consulting Contracts
- Naval Operations Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Contract Duration
- Potential for Scope Creep
- Contractor Performance Risk
- Dependency on Single Contractor
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, administrative-management-consulting, general-management-consulting, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, purchase-order, leidos-inc, district-of-columbia, professional-services, doctrine-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.4 million to LEIDOS, INC.. JOINT DOCTRINE SUPPORT PLAN - TASK 1
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-01-25. End: 2010-10-01.
What is Leidos, Inc.'s track record with similar federal contracts, particularly in administrative management and doctrine support?
Leidos, Inc. is a major government contractor with a substantial history of performing services across various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense. Their portfolio often includes complex program management, IT services, and specialized consulting. For administrative management and doctrine support, Leidos has a demonstrated capacity to handle large, multi-year contracts. Their experience typically involves providing analytical, research, and strategic planning support. Past performance reviews and contract databases would offer more granular detail on their success rates, client satisfaction, and any past issues on similar engagements. Given their size and scope, they are generally considered a reliable performer, though specific contract outcomes can vary.
How does the $16.4 million contract value compare to other federal spending on doctrine development and administrative consulting?
The $16.4 million contract value for the Joint Doctrine Support Plan over approximately four years represents a significant investment, averaging around $4.1 million annually. This figure is substantial for a specific support function but should be viewed within the broader context of the Department of Defense's overall budget, which runs into hundreds of billions of dollars. Compared to other federal spending on administrative and management consulting, this contract is moderately sized. Larger contracts in this space can reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars for comprehensive enterprise-wide solutions. However, for a focused area like doctrine support, $4.1 million per year is a considerable allocation, suggesting the critical importance placed on this function by the Navy.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract for the Department of the Navy?
The primary risks for the Department of the Navy in this contract include potential performance shortfalls if Leidos, Inc. fails to deliver the required doctrine support effectively. Given the firm fixed-price nature, there's a risk that the contractor might cut corners to maintain profitability, potentially impacting the quality or comprehensiveness of the doctrine. Another risk is contractor dependency; if Leidos performs well, the Navy might become reliant on them, making future transitions difficult or costly. Furthermore, changes in military strategy or doctrine requirements during the contract period could necessitate costly modifications or scope adjustments. Finally, while competition was full and open initially, the long duration could lead to complacency or reduced focus over time.
How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money in this context?
The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for well-defined services like administrative management and doctrine support, provided the scope is clearly articulated. It shifts the financial risk of cost overruns to the contractor, incentivizing them to manage resources efficiently and control expenses. This means the government pays a set price, making budgeting more predictable. For the Navy, this structure provides cost certainty. The effectiveness hinges on the accuracy of the initial cost estimates and the clarity of the statement of work. If the scope is poorly defined or unforeseen complexities arise, the contractor might struggle to deliver quality services within the fixed price, or the government might miss out on potential efficiencies if the contractor's actual costs are significantly lower than anticipated.
What is the historical spending pattern for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611) within the Department of the Navy?
Historical spending patterns for NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) within the Department of the Navy are substantial, reflecting the ongoing need for external expertise in optimizing operations, strategy, and management. While the specific $16.4 million award is for a particular task order, the Navy consistently procures services in this category across various programs and commands. Annual spending can fluctuate based on strategic priorities, budget allocations, and specific project requirements. Analyzing historical data reveals a trend of significant investment in consulting services to address complex challenges, improve efficiency, and support policy development. This particular contract represents one component of that broader spending.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: W74V8H05T0293
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Address: 4501 FORD AVENUE, STE 240, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22302
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,390,883
Exercised Options: $16,390,883
Current Obligation: $16,375,883
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-01-25
Current End Date: 2010-10-01
Potential End Date: 2010-10-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-31
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)