Department of Defense awarded $26.6M contract for management consulting services, with Leidos Inc. as the primary contractor
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,577,578 ($26.6M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-09-29
End Date: 2008-09-29
Contract Duration: 1,461 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)
Sector: Other
Official Description: TAS::21 2020::TAS 200412!004235!2100!W74V8H!DEF. CONTRACT. CMD. - WASHINGTON!GS23F8006H !C!N! !N!W74V8H04F1170! !20040929!20050929!148095086!148095086!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE, !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000003502196!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!A!A!6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20301
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $26.6 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: TAS::21 2020::TAS 200412!004235!2100!W74V8H!DEF. CONTRACT. CMD. - WASHINGTON!GS23F8006H !C!N! !N!W74V8H04F1170! !20040929!20050929!148095086!148095086!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE, !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!50000!001!11!WASHING… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 3. The contract duration was 1461 days. 4. The primary contractor is Leidos, Inc. 5. The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army. 6. The contract was awarded as a delivery order. 7. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541611.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount for this contract was $26,577,577.85. Without specific benchmarks for similar management consulting services contracts from the same period, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the duration of the contract (approximately 4 years) suggests a significant scope of work. Further analysis would require comparison with other contracts for similar services awarded around 2004-2008.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but full and open competition generally promotes a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The absence of specific bidder numbers limits a deeper analysis of the competitive intensity.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition suggests that taxpayers likely benefited from a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to more cost-effective solutions for the management consulting services required by the Department of the Army.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army, which received administrative management and general management consulting services. The services provided likely aimed to improve operational efficiency, strategic planning, or other management functions within the Army. The contract was awarded to a contractor located in San Diego, California, with the work likely performed in the Washington D.C. area. The contract supported professional services, potentially impacting the workforce through the engagement of specialized consultants.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the number of bidders in the full and open competition limits the assessment of competitive pressure on pricing.
- The provided data does not detail the specific deliverables or performance metrics, making it challenging to evaluate the effectiveness and value of the services rendered.
- The contract was awarded as a delivery order, which might indicate a task-based approach rather than a fixed, long-term project, potentially leading to less predictable cost structures.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust and fair bidding process.
- The contract was awarded to a well-established contractor, Leidos, Inc., which may indicate a level of trust and proven capability.
- The contract duration of approximately four years suggests a sustained need for the services, implying potential for significant impact and integration.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. The NAICS code 541611 covers administrative management and general management consulting services. This sector is characterized by a wide range of firms, from large corporations like Leidos to smaller specialized consultancies. Government spending in this area is often driven by the need for expertise in areas such as strategic planning, organizational efficiency, and IT management, which are critical for large federal agencies like the Department of Defense.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false) and there is no explicit mention of small business subcontracting requirements (sb: false). Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem through this specific award appears minimal. However, large prime contractors like Leidos often have subcontracting plans, and it's possible that small businesses could have been involved indirectly.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Defense's contracting and financial management oversight mechanisms. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, specific oversight would depend on the terms of that vehicle and the task orders issued. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where this award is recorded. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Technology Services
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- Department of Defense Contract Awards
- Information Technology Professional Services
- Administrative Management Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep given the nature of consulting services.
- Difficulty in objectively measuring the impact and value of consulting services.
- Contract awarded as a delivery order, which may have less defined long-term cost predictability compared to a fixed-price contract.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, management-consulting, administrative-management, general-management, professional-services, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, leidos-inc, naics-541611, district-of-columbia, contract-award
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $26.6 million to LEIDOS, INC.. TAS::21 2020::TAS 200412!004235!2100!W74V8H!DEF. CONTRACT. CMD. - WASHINGTON!GS23F8006H !C!N! !N!W74V8H04F1170! !20040929!20050929!148095086!148095086!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE, !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000003502196!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!A
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-09-29. End: 2008-09-29.
What was the specific nature of the management consulting services provided under this contract?
The contract's NAICS code (541611) indicates that the services provided were related to 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' This broad category typically encompasses activities such as strategic planning, organizational structure analysis, process improvement, operational efficiency studies, and general management advice. Without access to the specific Statement of Work (SOW) or task orders associated with this delivery order, the precise nature of the consulting engagements remains unspecified. However, given the awarding agency (Department of the Army), the services likely supported various aspects of military operations, logistics, personnel management, or administrative functions to enhance effectiveness and efficiency.
How does the $26.6 million award amount compare to similar contracts for management consulting services awarded around the 2004-2008 timeframe?
Comparing the $26.6 million award amount requires context regarding the scope, duration, and specific services. Contracts for management consulting services can vary significantly in value. For a contract spanning approximately four years (1461 days), this amount suggests a substantial engagement. To benchmark effectively, one would need to analyze other Department of Defense or similar federal agency contracts awarded between 2004 and 2008 for management consulting under NAICS code 541611 or closely related codes. Factors such as the number of consultants, their labor rates, and the complexity of the tasks would influence the total cost. Without such comparative data, it's challenging to definitively state whether this award represents a particularly high or low value.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this contract. Typically, such information would be found in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or the individual delivery orders issued against the contract. For management consulting services, KPIs might include metrics related to process efficiency improvements, cost savings achieved, successful implementation of strategic plans, or enhanced organizational performance. Deliverables could range from detailed analytical reports and strategic recommendations to implemented process changes and training programs. The absence of this information limits a thorough assessment of contractor performance and the ultimate value derived from the contract.
What is the track record of Leidos, Inc. (formerly Science Applications International Corporation - SAIC) in providing similar services to the Department of Defense?
Leidos, Inc., which acquired SAIC's government solutions business, has a long and extensive track record of providing a wide array of services to the Department of Defense (DoD) and other federal agencies. Historically, SAIC (and now Leidos) has been a major contractor in areas including IT services, systems engineering, logistics, and management consulting. Their involvement with the DoD spans decades and covers numerous complex programs. Given their established presence and broad capabilities, it is highly probable that they have successfully executed numerous contracts involving management consulting services similar to those specified under NAICS code 541611. Their large size and extensive experience suggest a capacity to handle significant and complex consulting engagements for the DoD.
Were there any specific risks identified or mitigation strategies employed for this contract?
The provided summary data does not explicitly list any identified risks or mitigation strategies associated with this particular contract award. However, for large federal contracts, especially those involving consulting services, common risks can include scope creep, contractor performance issues, cost overruns, security vulnerabilities, and challenges in integrating recommendations. Mitigation strategies often involve robust contract management, clear performance standards, regular progress reviews, defined change control processes, and strong communication channels between the government and the contractor. The fact that the contract was awarded under full and open competition might suggest that potential bidders were evaluated on their risk management approaches.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1710 SAIC DRIVE, ROOM #8031, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,652,877
Exercised Options: $27,884,713
Current Obligation: $26,577,578
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F8006H
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-09-29
Current End Date: 2008-09-29
Potential End Date: 2008-09-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-09-24
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)