DoD's $74.9M Afghan Detention Facility Construction Contract Awarded to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $74,899,492 ($74.9M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-06-15
End Date: 2013-02-03
Contract Duration: 964 days
Daily Burn Rate: $77.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: AFGHAN NATIONAL DETENTION FACILITY
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $74.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: AFGHAN NATIONAL DETENTION FACILITY Key points: 1. The contract awarded $74.9 million for construction of the Afghan National Detention Facility. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the DoD. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, with a benchmark of $77.7M.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The awarded amount of $74.9M is slightly below the benchmark of $77.7M, indicating potentially fair pricing. However, without detailed cost breakdowns or comparison to similar projects in the region, a definitive assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract utilized full and open competition, which typically drives competitive pricing and ensures the best value is sought. The award to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' is unusual and warrants further investigation into the specific entities involved.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for construction in a foreign country, with the effectiveness of competition in securing optimal pricing being a key factor in taxpayer impact.
Public Impact
Construction of a significant detention facility in Afghanistan. Potential implications for international relations and security. Use of U.S. taxpayer funds for infrastructure abroad.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Unusual awardee description ('MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES')
- Lack of specific small business participation noted
- Contract duration of 964 days
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized
- Award amount slightly below benchmark
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The benchmark for this contract is $77.7M, and the awarded amount of $74.9M is within a reasonable range, suggesting potentially good value.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this contract (ss=false, sb=false). This is common for large-scale international construction projects where specialized foreign contractors may be more suitable.
Oversight & Accountability
The award to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' raises questions about oversight and accountability. Ensuring proper vetting and performance monitoring of such entities is crucial for effective use of taxpayer funds.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Vague awardee description ('MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES')
- Lack of specific small business participation
- Potential for reduced oversight on foreign contractors
- Contract awarded for construction in a conflict zone
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $74.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. AFGHAN NATIONAL DETENTION FACILITY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $74.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-06-15. End: 2013-02-03.
What specific entities were included under 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES', and what was their prior performance record?
The designation 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' is vague and lacks transparency. Further investigation is needed to identify the specific companies or organizations that received funds, their qualifications, and their track record on similar projects. This information is critical for assessing accountability and the true value obtained for the $74.9 million expenditure.
Were there any risks associated with awarding a contract of this magnitude to an undefined group of foreign entities?
Yes, significant risks exist. These include potential issues with contract compliance, quality control, security, and financial transparency. Without clear identification of the awardees, it is difficult to perform due diligence, monitor performance effectively, or ensure adherence to U.S. standards and regulations, potentially exposing taxpayer funds to misuse or fraud.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best value for this construction project, given the unusual awardee description?
While 'full and open competition' is designed to foster value, the vague description of awardees complicates the assessment. It is unclear if the competition truly evaluated a broad range of qualified bidders or if the 'miscellaneous' category allowed for less scrutinized entities. The slight difference from the benchmark suggests potential value, but the lack of clarity on awardees prevents a definitive conclusion on the effectiveness of the competition.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W5J9JE10R0078
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $91,640,236
Exercised Options: $74,899,492
Current Obligation: $74,899,492
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-06-15
Current End Date: 2013-02-03
Potential End Date: 2013-02-03 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-10-07
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)