Army awards $291M for T700 engine production to General Electric, a sole-source contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $29,138,074 ($29.1M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-12-16
End Date: 2026-07-31
Contract Duration: 592 days
Daily Burn Rate: $49.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: T700 SERIES ENGINE PRODUCTION
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35898
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $29.1 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: T700 SERIES ENGINE PRODUCTION Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single supplier raises questions about price competitiveness. 2. Long-term production contract may indicate a stable, established need for the T700 engine. 3. Sole-source nature limits opportunities for new market entrants and innovation. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. 5. Delivery order structure suggests phased production and delivery over approximately two years. 6. Geographic concentration in Alabama for production could have local economic impacts.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this sole-source contract is challenging without competitive bids. The firm fixed-price structure is standard for production, but the absence of competition means there's no direct comparison to assess if the pricing is optimal. The total award amount of $291.4 million for a 592-day duration (approximately 20 months) needs further analysis to determine if it aligns with historical spending for similar engine production or if it represents a fair market price under these non-competitive conditions.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one bidder, General Electric Company, was solicited. This approach is typically used when a unique capability or proprietary technology is required, or in cases of urgent need where competition is not feasible. The lack of competition means there was no opportunity for other manufacturers to bid, potentially leading to higher prices than if multiple bids were considered. This limits price discovery and the government's ability to leverage market forces.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. Without competing offers, it is difficult to ascertain if the negotiated price reflects the best possible value for the government.
Public Impact
The U.S. Army benefits from the continued production of T700 series engines, crucial for various aircraft operations. This contract ensures the supply of essential aircraft engine components, supporting military readiness. Production is concentrated in Alabama, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in the state's manufacturing sector. The contract supports the aerospace and defense manufacturing workforce, particularly those skilled in engine production.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition and potential for cost savings.
- Lack of transparency in the bidding process makes it difficult to assess true value for money.
- Dependence on a single supplier for critical engine components could pose supply chain risks.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Long-term production indicates a sustained need and potential for economies of scale.
- Production in Alabama may provide economic benefits to the local region.
Sector Analysis
The T700 engine is a widely used turboshaft engine manufactured by General Electric, powering numerous military and civilian helicopters. The market for military aircraft engines is highly specialized, often dominated by a few large players due to high R&D costs and stringent qualification requirements. This contract falls within the broader aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other sole-source or limited-competition contracts for similar engine production or major component manufacturing within the Department of Defense.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to include a small business set-aside. General Electric Company is a large prime contractor. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without specific set-aside goals or mandated subcontracting targets, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular contract is likely minimal, though GE's overall subcontracting practices could still involve small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. As a sole-source award, scrutiny might be higher to ensure fair and reasonable pricing. Transparency is limited by the non-competitive nature. The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) may conduct audits to verify costs if necessary, and the Inspector General's office could investigate any allegations of impropriety. The firm fixed-price nature simplifies some oversight aspects by fixing the total price.
Related Government Programs
- T700 Engine Support Contracts
- Military Helicopter Component Procurement
- Aerospace Manufacturing Contracts
- Department of Defense Engine Production
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for price inflation
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, army, aircraft-engine-and-engine-parts-manufacturing, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, production, alabama, general-electric-company, t700-series-engine
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $29.1 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. T700 SERIES ENGINE PRODUCTION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $29.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-12-16. End: 2026-07-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for T700 engine production by the Department of Defense?
Historical spending data for T700 engine production by the Department of Defense reveals a consistent, long-term investment in this critical component. Prior contracts, often awarded to General Electric due to its sole-provider status for this engine family, have spanned many years and varied in value based on production volume and specific configurations required. While exact figures fluctuate, the aggregate spending reflects the sustained operational tempo and fleet size of helicopters utilizing the T700. Analyzing past awards, particularly those that may have involved some level of competition or were sole-source with detailed justification, can provide a benchmark against which the current $291.4 million award can be assessed for reasonableness, though direct comparisons are complicated by evolving market conditions and specific contract terms.
How does the firm fixed-price contract type benefit the government in this scenario?
The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally advantageous for the government, especially in production scenarios like this one for T700 engines. Under an FFP agreement, the total price is fixed and not subject to adjustment based on the contractor's cost experience. This means that General Electric bears the primary responsibility for any cost overruns incurred during production. For the government, this provides cost certainty and predictability, simplifying budgeting and financial management. It incentivizes the contractor to control costs efficiently to maximize profit. While the initial price might be negotiated, the FFP structure protects the government from unexpected increases in material, labor, or overhead costs throughout the contract period.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for critical engine production?
Sole-source awards for critical components like the T700 engine present several risks. Foremost is the potential for inflated pricing, as the absence of competition removes the downward pressure that multiple bidders would typically exert on cost. This can lead to the government paying more than necessary. Secondly, it can stifle innovation; without the incentive of winning new contracts through competitive bids, the incumbent supplier may have less motivation to invest in process improvements or cost-reduction technologies. Lastly, there's a strategic risk related to supply chain dependency. Relying on a single source for essential parts can create vulnerabilities if the supplier faces production issues, financial instability, or geopolitical disruptions. This dependence can limit the government's flexibility and leverage in negotiations.
What is General Electric's track record with T700 engine production and similar defense contracts?
General Electric Company has a long and established track record as the primary, and often sole, manufacturer of the T700 series turboshaft engine. This engine has been a workhorse for the U.S. military, particularly for helicopters like the Black Hawk and Apache, for decades. GE's history with the T700 is extensive, involving numerous production runs, upgrades, and support contracts. Beyond the T700, GE is a major player in the aerospace and defense sector, producing a wide range of jet engines and related components for military and commercial applications. Their experience includes managing large-scale production, adhering to stringent military specifications, and fulfilling complex delivery schedules, making them a deeply entrenched incumbent for T700 production.
How does the contract duration and delivery schedule impact the overall value assessment?
The contract duration of 592 days, spanning from December 16, 2024, to July 31, 2026, indicates a phased production and delivery approach over approximately 20 months. This duration is relatively standard for production contracts of this nature, allowing for planned manufacturing processes and timely delivery of engines or components. The value assessment is influenced by this schedule; a longer duration might allow for greater economies of scale in production, potentially lowering per-unit costs, but also extends the period over which funds are committed. Conversely, a shorter, more compressed schedule could increase urgency but potentially raise costs due to expedited processes. The total award of $291.4 million spread over this period suggests a significant but manageable annual expenditure, aligning with the steady demand for these engines.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1000 WESTERN AVE, LYNN, MA, 01905
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $29,138,074
Exercised Options: $29,138,074
Current Obligation: $29,138,074
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W58RGZ24D0053
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-12-16
Current End Date: 2026-07-31
Potential End Date: 2026-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-08-25
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)