DoD's $2.09B Adaptive Engine Transition Program contract with GE faces scrutiny over competition and value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,090,921,087 ($2.1B)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-06-30
End Date: 2024-06-30
Contract Duration: 2,922 days
Daily Burn Rate: $715.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: ADAPTIVE ENGINE TRANSITION PROGRAM (AETP)
Place of Performance
Location: CINCINNATI, HAMILTON County, OHIO, 45215
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $2.09 billion to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: ADAPTIVE ENGINE TRANSITION PROGRAM (AETP) Key points: 1. The contract awarded to General Electric Company for aircraft engine parts is a significant expenditure. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and limited innovation. 3. The 'OH' status (Ohio) might indicate regional economic considerations. 4. The cost-plus incentive fee structure could lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's value of over $2 billion for aircraft engines warrants close examination. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to benchmark pricing against similar contracts, raising concerns about whether taxpayers are receiving the best possible value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to General Electric Company. This significantly limits price discovery and potentially allows for higher profit margins than would be achievable in a competitive environment.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may be paying a premium for these aircraft engines and parts, as there was no market pressure to drive down costs.
Public Impact
Significant taxpayer funds allocated to a single contractor for critical defense components. Potential for reduced innovation due to the absence of competitive pressure. Impact on the broader aerospace manufacturing sector by consolidating a large contract.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost-plus contract type
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Award to established manufacturer
- Potential for technological advancement in engines
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing. Spending benchmarks in this area are highly variable, but large sole-source awards for advanced technology like adaptive engines can represent substantial investments.
Small Business Impact
The contract data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses. Given the nature of advanced engine manufacturing, it is likely that prime contract opportunities for small businesses are limited, though they may participate as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'OH' status suggests potential state-level oversight or incentives, but the lack of competition warrants robust oversight from the Department of the Air Force to ensure cost control and performance.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competitive pressure.
- Cost-plus contract type increases risk of overruns.
- Long contract duration (8 years) extends exposure to risks.
- Lack of transparency on specific performance metrics and targets.
- Potential for vendor lock-in with critical defense technology.
Tags
aircraft-engine-and-engine-parts-manufac, department-of-defense, oh, definitive-contract, billion-dollar
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $2.09 billion to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. ADAPTIVE ENGINE TRANSITION PROGRAM (AETP)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.09 billion.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-06-30. End: 2024-06-30.
What specific technological advancements justify the sole-source award and the significant investment in the Adaptive Engine Transition Program?
The justification for a sole-source award typically hinges on unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or critical national security needs that cannot be met by other sources. For the AETP, the focus is likely on developing next-generation jet engine technology offering improved fuel efficiency, thrust, and thermal management for future Air Force platforms. Detailed technical documentation and independent assessments would be required to validate these claims and justify the absence of competition.
How will the Department of Defense ensure cost control and prevent potential overruns under this Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract?
Effective cost control under a CPIF contract requires rigorous oversight, clear performance metrics, and well-defined target costs and fee structures. The Air Force must actively monitor GE's expenditures, validate cost submissions, and ensure that incentive targets are challenging yet achievable. Regular audits and performance reviews are crucial to identify and address potential cost creep early, ensuring that the incentive structure effectively aligns contractor performance with government objectives and taxpayer interests.
What is the long-term strategic benefit of investing such a large sum in a single engine program without exploring alternative technological pathways?
Investing heavily in a single program like AETP aims to accelerate the development and fielding of a specific, advanced engine capability deemed critical for future air dominance. The strategic benefit lies in potentially leapfrogging adversaries and equipping future aircraft with superior performance. However, the risk is that this chosen pathway might not yield the expected results or that alternative, potentially more disruptive, technologies could emerge elsewhere. Diversification of R&D efforts, even at a smaller scale, could mitigate this risk.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 NEUMANN WAY, CINCINNATI, OH, 45215
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,155,798,014
Exercised Options: $2,155,798,014
Current Obligation: $2,090,921,087
Actual Outlays: $66,077,395
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 296
Total Subaward Amount: $65,564,414
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-06-30
Current End Date: 2024-06-30
Potential End Date: 2024-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-06-24
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- F-15EX Lots 2+ Propulsion System Procurement — $1.0B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)