DoD awards $22.3M for 700 Turbine Engines to General Electric, citing sole-source justification
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,352,540 ($22.4M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-03-24
End Date: 2026-08-31
Contract Duration: 525 days
Daily Burn Rate: $42.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: TURBINE 700 ENGINE PRODUCTION.
Place of Performance
Location: LYNN, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01905
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.4 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: TURBINE 700 ENGINE PRODUCTION. Key points: 1. Value for money is difficult to assess due to the sole-source nature of the award. 2. Competition dynamics are absent, as the contract was not competed. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, given the established contractor and firm fixed-price terms. 4. Performance context is limited to the production of specific engine components. 5. Sector positioning is within the defense industrial base for aircraft engine manufacturing.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $22.3 million for 700 turbine engines is a significant investment. Without competitive bidding, it's challenging to benchmark the pricing against market rates or similar contracts. The firm fixed-price (FFP) structure provides some cost certainty for the government, but the absence of competition raises questions about whether the best possible price was achieved. Further analysis would require access to historical pricing for similar engine models or components from General Electric.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. The data indicates the contract type is 'NOT COMPETED'. This approach is typically used when only one responsible source can provide the required goods or services. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces to drive down prices and ensure the most innovative solutions are considered.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may not be benefiting from the most cost-effective pricing that could have been achieved through a competitive bidding process.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army, who will receive the turbine engines. The services delivered include the production of 700 aircraft turbine engines. The geographic impact is primarily within Massachusetts, where the contract is managed, and potentially at military installations where the engines will be deployed. Workforce implications include continued employment and potential expansion at General Electric facilities involved in engine production.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price discovery and potential cost savings for taxpayers.
- Lack of competition may stifle innovation from other potential suppliers in the long term.
- Dependence on a single supplier for critical components can create supply chain vulnerabilities.
Positive Signals
- Award to an established contractor (General Electric) suggests a high likelihood of meeting technical specifications.
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost predictability for the government.
- Contract duration aligns with production needs, ensuring timely delivery of essential components.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing sector, a critical component of the aerospace and defense industry. This sector is characterized by high barriers to entry due to complex technology, significant R&D investment, and stringent quality requirements. General Electric is a major player in this market. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other sole-source or competitively awarded contracts for similar engine production or major components within the defense sector.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Given the specialized nature of aircraft engine production and the sole-source award to a large corporation like General Electric, it is unlikely that significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses will be mandated or readily available through this specific award. The focus is on the prime contractor's capabilities.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price terms, requiring delivery of specified engines. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature, but contract award data is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Engine Production Contracts
- Defense Procurement
- Sole-Source Defense Acquisitions
- Turbine Engine Manufacturing
- Department of the Army Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competitive justification.
- Potential for inflated pricing due to absence of competition.
- Limited transparency on cost breakdown and profit margins.
Tags
defense, department-of-the-army, general-electric-company, aircraft-engine-manufacturing, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, massachusetts, turbine-engine-production, non-competed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.4 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. TURBINE 700 ENGINE PRODUCTION.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-03-24. End: 2026-08-31.
What is General Electric's track record with the Department of Defense for similar turbine engine production?
General Electric has a long-standing and extensive track record of supplying aircraft engines and related components to the Department of Defense across all branches. They are a primary contractor for numerous military aircraft platforms, including fighter jets, bombers, transport planes, and helicopters. Their history includes both large-scale production contracts and sustainment/maintenance services. For turbine engine production specifically, GE has consistently delivered high-performance engines, often as the sole or primary supplier for specific platforms. Their experience encompasses meeting stringent military specifications, managing complex supply chains, and adhering to rigorous quality control standards. Analyzing past performance on similar sole-source or competitively awarded contracts for engine production would provide further context on their reliability and cost-effectiveness.
How does the per-unit cost of these turbine engines compare to market rates or similar government contracts?
The provided data does not include a per-unit cost breakdown, only the total award amount ($22,352,540) for 700 engines. This yields an implied per-unit cost of approximately $31,932. However, without knowing the specific model, complexity, and associated support included, this figure is difficult to benchmark. As this was a sole-source award, direct comparison to competitively bid contracts for identical or similar engines is not feasible. Market rates for commercial aircraft engines of comparable size and thrust can vary widely, and military-grade engines often incur higher costs due to specialized materials, testing, and performance requirements. A thorough value assessment would require access to GE's pricing structure for this specific engine type and potentially historical data from the DoD on similar sole-source procurements.
What are the primary risks associated with this sole-source award for turbine engine production?
The primary risks associated with this sole-source award are related to cost and competition. Firstly, the lack of competition means the government may not be achieving the lowest possible price, as there was no market pressure to drive down costs. This could lead to overpayment compared to what a competitive process might yield. Secondly, there's a risk of vendor lock-in; the DoD becomes dependent on General Electric for these specific engines, potentially limiting future flexibility in sourcing or negotiating terms. Thirdly, while GE is a reputable manufacturer, sole-source awards can sometimes mask inefficiencies or higher-than-necessary profit margins if not rigorously scrutinized. Finally, any production delays or quality issues from a single supplier can have a significant impact on military readiness, as there are no immediate alternative sources.
What is the expected program effectiveness and impact on military readiness?
The expected program effectiveness hinges on General Electric's ability to deliver 700 functional turbine engines according to the specified requirements and timeline (delivery order ending August 31, 2026). If successful, this contract will directly contribute to the operational readiness of aircraft platforms that utilize these engines. The Department of the Army relies on a steady supply of reliable engines to maintain its fleet. The effectiveness will be measured by the quality, performance, and timely delivery of the engines. Potential impacts on military readiness are positive, assuming the engines are critical for current or future operations and that their production is necessary to meet fleet demands. Conversely, any failure in delivery or quality could negatively impact readiness.
How does this contract's value compare to historical spending on aircraft turbine engines by the Department of Defense?
The $22.3 million award for 700 turbine engines represents a specific procurement action. The Department of Defense, as a whole, spends billions of dollars annually on aircraft, engines, and related support services. This particular contract is a delivery order under a larger framework, likely an IDIQ or similar contract vehicle, and its value should be considered in that context. Historical spending on turbine engines by the DoD is substantial, covering new production, upgrades, spare parts, and maintenance across numerous aircraft types. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to analyze the total DoD spending on aircraft engines over several fiscal years, segmenting it by prime contractors, engine types, and contract types (competitive vs. sole-source). This $22.3 million is a component of that larger spending picture, likely focused on a specific engine model or production run.
What are the implications of the firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type for this acquisition?
The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally favorable for the government when acquiring goods with well-defined specifications, as it shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, General Electric. This means the price agreed upon is the maximum the government will pay, regardless of GE's actual costs. This provides budget certainty for the Department of the Army. For the contractor, FFP contracts incentivize efficiency and cost control to maximize profit. However, in a sole-source situation, the benefit of price certainty is somewhat diminished if the initial price was not competitively determined. The effectiveness of FFP relies heavily on the accuracy of the initial cost estimates and the contractor's ability to manage production within that price.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1000 WESTERN AVE, LYNN, MA, 01905
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,352,540
Exercised Options: $22,352,540
Current Obligation: $22,352,540
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W58RGZ24D0053
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-03-24
Current End Date: 2026-08-31
Potential End Date: 2026-08-31 12:08:00
Last Modified: 2025-08-20
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)