DoD awards $25M for T700 engine production to General Electric, a sole-source contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,984,239 ($25.0M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-04-21
End Date: 2027-05-31
Contract Duration: 770 days
Daily Burn Rate: $32.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: T700 ENGINE PRODUCTION.
Place of Performance
Location: LYNN, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01905
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $25.0 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: T700 ENGINE PRODUCTION. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, established supplier, raising questions about price competitiveness. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs, but lacks competitive pressure for savings. 3. Long-term contract duration suggests a sustained need for these critical engine components. 4. Focus on production indicates a mature product line rather than new development. 5. The award is a delivery order against an existing contract vehicle, suggesting streamlined procurement. 6. No small business set-aside was applied, potentially limiting broader economic participation.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this sole-source contract is challenging without competitive bids. The $25 million award for T700 engine production over approximately two years suggests a significant investment in maintaining critical aircraft capabilities. While firm-fixed-price contracts offer cost certainty, the absence of competition means there's no direct market comparison to assess if the pricing is optimal or if potential savings were foregone. Further analysis would require understanding the historical pricing trends for these engines and comparing them to similar components or previous contract awards.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, General Electric Company, was solicited. This approach is typically used when a specific capability or product is only available from a single source, or in situations where competition is not feasible or practical. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from the price discovery mechanisms inherent in a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to higher costs than might be achieved in an open market.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure to drive down prices. Without multiple bids, it's difficult to ascertain the most cost-effective price for these essential engine components.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from the continued production of T700 engines, crucial for its helicopter fleet. This contract ensures the availability of critical components for aircraft maintenance and operational readiness. The primary beneficiaries are military aviation units relying on aircraft powered by T700 engines. Workforce implications are likely concentrated within General Electric's manufacturing facilities, supporting skilled labor in engine production.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition and potential cost savings for taxpayers.
- Lack of small business participation may reduce opportunities for smaller firms in the supply chain.
- Dependence on a single supplier for critical engine parts could pose supply chain risks.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Award to an established manufacturer like GE suggests a reliable source for critical components.
- Long-term contract duration ensures sustained availability of essential engine parts.
Sector Analysis
The T700 engine is a widely used turboshaft engine, particularly in military helicopters. The market for aircraft engine manufacturing and parts is dominated by a few large, established players. This contract falls within the broader aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, which is characterized by high technological barriers to entry and significant government procurement. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for similar engine production or major component manufacturing within the Department of Defense.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific procurement are limited. The primary contractor, General Electric, will likely fulfill the majority of the work, and any subcontracting would be at their discretion, potentially impacting the broader small business ecosystem within the aerospace supply chain.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense employs various oversight mechanisms for contracts, including contract close-out procedures, performance reviews, and audits. Inspector General (IG) reports can scrutinize contract performance, pricing, and compliance. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like SAM.gov, where contract awards are publicly reported. However, the sole-source nature of this award means that the primary accountability for value for money rests on the negotiation and management of the contract by the contracting officers.
Related Government Programs
- T700 Engine Maintenance and Repair Contracts
- Aircraft Component Manufacturing Contracts
- Department of Defense Aviation Procurement
- Turboshaft Engine Production Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for higher pricing
- No small business set-aside
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, aircraft-engine-and-engine-parts-manufacturing, general-electric-company, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, massachusetts, t700-engine, aviation, manufacturing
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $25.0 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. T700 ENGINE PRODUCTION.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-04-21. End: 2027-05-31.
What is the historical spending trend for T700 engine production by the Department of Defense?
Analyzing historical spending on T700 engine production requires accessing detailed procurement data over multiple fiscal years. Typically, such data would reveal fluctuations based on fleet readiness requirements, modernization programs, and the lifecycle of the aircraft utilizing these engines. For instance, if a major helicopter fleet is undergoing significant upgrades or expansion, spending on T700 production and related parts would likely increase. Conversely, as aircraft age or are retired, demand might decrease. Without specific historical data for this contract vehicle or similar sole-source awards, it's difficult to provide precise figures, but trends often correlate with broader defense budget allocations and strategic priorities for aviation assets.
How does the firm-fixed-price (FFP) structure compare to other contract types for engine production in terms of cost risk?
A Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract places the majority of the cost risk on the contractor. This means the contractor is obligated to complete the work for a predetermined price, regardless of their actual costs. For the government, this offers significant cost certainty, as the final price is known upfront. However, in a sole-source FFP contract, the government may not achieve the lowest possible price because there is no competitive pressure to drive down costs. Other contract types, like Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) or Incentive Fee contracts, might offer more flexibility for complex or R&D-intensive procurements but shift some cost risk back to the government and require more intensive oversight to ensure efficiency and prevent cost overruns.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for critical defense components like the T700 engine?
Sole-source awards for critical defense components present several risks. Foremost is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competitive bidding, meaning the government may pay more than necessary. Secondly, it can lead to vendor lock-in, making it difficult and costly to switch suppliers in the future, even if better alternatives emerge. There's also a risk of complacency from the sole supplier, potentially impacting innovation or responsiveness. Furthermore, a single point of failure in the supply chain can be catastrophic; if the sole manufacturer faces production issues, it could severely impact military readiness. Robust contract management and oversight are crucial to mitigate these risks.
What is General Electric's track record with T700 engine production and similar defense contracts?
General Electric (GE) has a long-standing and extensive track record as a primary manufacturer of the T700 engine, which powers numerous military helicopters, including those used by the U.S. Army. Their experience spans decades, encompassing production, upgrades, and support for these critical powerplants. GE is a major defense contractor with a broad portfolio of aviation engines and systems for various military platforms. Their history with the T700 specifically suggests a deep understanding of the engine's design, manufacturing processes, and performance requirements. While specific performance metrics for all past contracts are not publicly detailed, GE's continued role as a key supplier indicates a generally satisfactory performance history in meeting the military's needs for this engine type.
Are there any alternative engines or manufacturers that could potentially compete for T700 engine production in the future?
The T700 engine is a mature and established product, and its production is currently dominated by General Electric. While the defense industry continuously seeks technological advancements and potential competition, the barriers to entry for developing and certifying a completely new engine to replace a widely fielded system like the T700 are extremely high. This involves immense R&D costs, extensive testing, and integration challenges with existing airframes. It is more likely that competition might arise in the form of engine upgrades, overhauls, or potentially through licensed production agreements, rather than a direct replacement by a competitor in the near to medium term, unless a specific strategic initiative is launched to foster such competition.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1000 WESTERN AVE, LYNN, MA, 01905
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,984,239
Exercised Options: $24,984,239
Current Obligation: $24,984,239
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W58RGZ24D0053
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-04-21
Current End Date: 2027-05-31
Potential End Date: 2027-05-31 12:05:00
Last Modified: 2025-08-28
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)