DoD Awards $45.8M for Computer Systems Design Services to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $45,853,848 ($45.9M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2015-05-24
End Date: 2016-05-24
Contract Duration: 366 days
Daily Burn Rate: $125.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF [PIIN: W56KJD-15-C-0012]COMMERCIAL CONTRACT AWARD
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $45.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF [PIIN: W56KJD-15-C-0012]COMMERCIAL CONTRACT AWARD Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $45.8M awarded. 2. Contract awarded to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' raises questions about competition and domestic impact. 3. The 'Not Competed' status indicates a lack of competitive bidding, potentially impacting price discovery. 4. Services fall under Computer Systems Design, a key IT sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value is substantial. Without a competitive process, it's difficult to assess if the $45.8M represents a fair market price compared to similar services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was 'Not Competed', indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for a $45.8M contract suggests potential for overpayment, impacting taxpayer funds negatively.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may not have received the best value due to the absence of competitive bidding. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' raises concerns about transparency and potential economic leakage. Lack of competition could stifle innovation and prevent smaller, domestic businesses from participating.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Award to foreign entities
- Lack of transparency in awardee identification
Positive Signals
- Definitive contract provides clear terms.
- Firm Fixed Price contract limits cost overrun risk.
Sector Analysis
This contract is in the Information Technology sector, specifically for Computer Systems Design Services. Spending in this area is consistently high across government agencies, but competitive bidding is crucial for cost-effectiveness.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not competed and awarded to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees', indicating no direct benefit or opportunity for small businesses in this procurement.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'Not Competed' status warrants further review to ensure proper justification and adherence to procurement regulations. Transparency regarding the specific foreign awardees is also important for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Award to unspecified foreign entities
- Potential for inflated pricing
- Limited transparency
- No small business participation
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $45.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. IGF::OT::IGF [PIIN: W56KJD-15-C-0012]COMMERCIAL CONTRACT AWARD
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $45.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-05-24. End: 2016-05-24.
What was the justification for not competing this $45.8M contract, and were alternative solutions explored?
The justification for not competing this significant contract is not provided in the data. Typically, sole-source awards require extensive documentation proving why competition is not feasible or advantageous. Without this information, it's impossible to assess if taxpayer funds were used efficiently or if alternative, competitive approaches were adequately considered.
What are the specific risks associated with awarding a large contract to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' without competition?
Awarding a large contract to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' without competition presents several risks. These include potential lack of oversight, difficulty in enforcing contract terms or quality standards, currency exchange rate fluctuations, and the risk of funds not benefiting the domestic economy. Transparency regarding the specific entities and their capabilities is crucial.
How does the lack of competition impact the government's ability to ensure effective computer systems design services at a reasonable cost?
The lack of competition significantly hinders the government's ability to ensure effectiveness and reasonable cost. Without market forces driving prices down and encouraging innovation, the government is reliant on the awarded entity's pricing and service delivery. This can lead to suboptimal outcomes, higher expenses, and potentially less innovative solutions compared to a competitive environment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT › INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W56KJD15RXXXX
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $45,853,848
Exercised Options: $45,853,848
Current Obligation: $45,853,848
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-05-24
Current End Date: 2016-05-24
Potential End Date: 2016-05-24 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-03-19
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)