DoD's Army Awards $17.6M for Facilities Support in 2026 to Foreign Awardee

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,634,481 ($17.6M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2026-01-01

End Date: 2026-12-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $48.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS FUNDING ACTION 2026 IS TO ADD FUNDING FOR APS EYGELSHOVEN

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.6 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS FUNDING ACTION 2026 IS TO ADD FUNDING FOR APS EYGELSHOVEN Key points: 1. Significant funding allocated for facilities support services. 2. Contract awarded to a miscellaneous foreign awardee, raising questions about domestic competition. 3. The contract is not competed, potentially limiting price discovery and value. 4. The sector is facilities support, a common area for government spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's value of $17.6M for one year of facilities support is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to similar services procured through competitive means.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed, indicating a limited competition approach. This lack of competition may have hindered effective price discovery, potentially leading to a higher cost for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The non-competitive award of $17.6M for facilities support services represents a direct expenditure of taxpayer funds without the benefit of market-driven price optimization.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying more than necessary due to the lack of competition. Foreign awardees receiving significant DoD contracts can be a point of public interest. The essential nature of facilities support services means this spending directly impacts operational readiness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Foreign awardee
High contract value

Positive Signals

Clear purpose for funding
Defined contract period

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) encompass a broad range of services for maintaining and operating buildings and grounds. Government spending in this sector is consistent, but competitive procurement typically drives efficiency and cost savings.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the awardee is a 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardee' and does not specify small business participation. This suggests that small businesses were likely not involved in this specific contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Army awarded this contract. Oversight would typically involve contract performance monitoring and financial audits to ensure funds are used appropriately and services are delivered as specified.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Support Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competitive bidding
Potential for overpayment
Limited transparency
Foreign awardee raises potential security/oversight issues

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.6 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. THE PURPOSE OF THIS FUNDING ACTION 2026 IS TO ADD FUNDING FOR APS EYGELSHOVEN

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-01. End: 2026-12-31.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a limited competition basis, especially given its significant value?

The justification for limited competition is not provided in the data. Typically, such awards require a documented rationale, such as the unavailability of other sources, urgent and compelling needs, or specific statutory authority. Without this, it raises concerns about whether a more competitive process was feasible.

How does the $17.6M contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities support services, considering it was not competed?

Benchmarking this $17.6M contract is challenging without competitive data. Industry benchmarks for facilities support vary widely based on scope, location, and service level. The lack of competition means we cannot definitively say if this price is favorable or inflated compared to what a competitive market would yield.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a large facilities support contract to a foreign entity without competition?

Risks include potential national security concerns, difficulties in enforcing contract terms or quality standards, currency exchange rate fluctuations impacting cost, and the missed opportunity to support domestic businesses and economies. The lack of competition exacerbates these risks by limiting oversight and price validation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SVCS. › TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,634,481

Exercised Options: $17,634,481

Current Obligation: $17,634,481

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline