DoD Awards $13M Facilities Support Contract to PAE Government Services, Inc. via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,957,014 ($13.0M)
Contractor: PAE Government Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-05-03
End Date: 2010-11-30
Contract Duration: 2,402 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200408!005534!2100!W52H09!TACOM ROCK ISLAND !W52H0904C5004 !A!N! !Y! ! !20040503!20050531!809790017!809790017!044435766!N!PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC !888 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET,!LOS ANGELES !CA!90017!65104!161!17!ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL !ROCK ISLAND !ILLINOIS !+000001358815!N!N!000007840752!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!004!B! !C!N!Z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: ROCK ISLAND, ROCK ISLAND County, ILLINOIS, 61299
State: Illinois Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.0 million to PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 200408!005534!2100!W52H09!TACOM ROCK ISLAND !W52H0904C5004 !A!N! !Y! ! !20040503!20050531!809790017!809790017!044435766!N!PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC !888 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET,!LOS ANGELES !CA!90017!65104!161!17!ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL !ROCK… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $12,957,004.49, was awarded to PAE Government Services, Inc. for facilities operations support services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process aimed at achieving best value. 3. The contract duration is 2402 days, suggesting a long-term need for these services. 4. The primary sector is Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210), a common area of government contracting.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $13 million over 2402 days suggests a significant but potentially reasonable annual cost for comprehensive facilities operations support. Benchmarking against similar large-scale government facilities management contracts would provide a clearer picture of its cost-effectiveness.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and promotes price discovery through competitive proposals. This method is generally expected to yield a fair market price.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers are likely receiving a fair price for the essential facilities operations support services provided to the Department of the Army.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness of critical military installations by maintaining facilities. Supports the Department of the Army's mission through reliable infrastructure management. Provides essential services that impact the daily lives and work environment of military personnel and civilian staff. Contributes to the local economy through employment and resource utilization.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in long-term facilities management contracts.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure operations.
- Ensuring consistent service quality over the extended contract duration.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, maximizing potential for value.
- Long contract duration indicates a stable and predictable service provision.
- Services are essential for military base operations.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) encompass a broad range of activities including building operation and maintenance, groundskeeping, and other support functions for government facilities. Spending in this sector is substantial and directly tied to the operational needs of federal agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The award through full and open competition suggests a structured procurement process. However, ongoing oversight would be crucial to ensure contractor performance, adherence to contract terms, and effective use of taxpayer funds throughout the contract's lifecycle.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to price escalation or performance decay.
- Potential for vendor lock-in if competition is not re-established effectively.
- Dependence on a single entity for critical infrastructure maintenance.
- Need for rigorous ongoing performance monitoring to ensure value.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, il, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.0 million to PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.. 200408!005534!2100!W52H09!TACOM ROCK ISLAND !W52H0904C5004 !A!N! !Y! ! !20040503!20050531!809790017!809790017!044435766!N!PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC !888 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET,!LOS ANGELES !CA!90017!65104!161!17!ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL !ROCK ISLAND !ILLINOIS !+000001358815!N!N!000007840752!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-05-03. End: 2010-11-30.
What specific metrics are used to evaluate PAE's performance in delivering facilities operations support services, and how are these metrics tied to contract payments?
Performance evaluation typically involves metrics related to response times for maintenance requests, quality of repairs, adherence to safety standards, and overall facility upkeep. These metrics are often defined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and can be linked to incentive fees or penalties, ensuring the contractor meets or exceeds service level agreements and provides value for taxpayer money.
What are the potential risks associated with a long-term (2402 days) facilities support contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Risks include contractor performance degradation over time, unexpected cost increases due to market fluctuations, and technological obsolescence in maintenance practices. Mitigation strategies often involve robust contract management, regular performance reviews, clear escalation procedures, and built-in mechanisms for contract modifications or re-competition if necessary to ensure continued service quality and cost control.
How does the annual cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities support services at Department of Defense installations?
Without specific cost breakdowns and detailed service scopes, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the annual cost of approximately $2 million for comprehensive facilities support at a major installation is within a plausible range, given the complexity and scale of DoD operations. Benchmarking against similar contracts and private sector equivalents would be necessary for a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Goldberg Lindsay & CO. LLC (UEI: 075062583)
Address: 888 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET,, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $109,777
Exercised Options: $109,777
Current Obligation: $12,957,014
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-05-03
Current End Date: 2010-11-30
Potential End Date: 2010-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-01-14
More Contracts from PAE Government Services, Inc.
- Bliss Food Services — $770.3M (Department of State)
- THE Perponderence of This Requirement IS for Fuel Management and Services Including Fuel Acquisition to Various Delivery Points. This Requirement Also Includes Program Management — $496.4M (Department of State)
- Operations and Maintenance Support Services for the Embassy Compound in Baghdad — $467.7M (Department of State)
- Operations and Maintenance Services AT Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center, Iraq — $414.6M (Department of State)
- . Operations and Maintenance - Program Management — $287.8M (Department of State)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)