DoD Awards $59M for Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing, Raising Value Concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $59,039,849 ($59.0M)

Contractor: Conco, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-09-24

End Date: 2010-06-09

Contract Duration: 2,084 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200412!001407!2100!W15QKN!TACOM - PICATINNY !W15QKN04C1139 !A!N! !N! ! !20040924!20080930!623757762!623757762!623757762!N!CONCO, INC !4000 OAKLAWN DRIVE !LOUISVILLE !KY!40219!48000!111!21!LOUISVILLE !JEFFERSON !KENTUCKY !+000009700162!N!N!000000000000!J066!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/INSTRUMENTS & LAB EQUIPMENT !A8C!CONTAINERS AND HANDLING EQUIPMENT !000 !* !332992!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !B! !A!N!J!2!003!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !A! !A!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: LOUISVILLE, JEFFERSON County, KENTUCKY, 40201

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $59.0 million to CONCO, INC. for work described as: 200412!001407!2100!W15QKN!TACOM - PICATINNY !W15QKN04C1139 !A!N! !N! ! !20040924!20080930!623757762!623757762!623757762!N!CONCO, INC !4000 OAKLAWN DRIVE !LOUISVILLE !KY!40219!48000!111!21!LOUISVILLE !JEFF… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing, a critical defense sector. 2. High contract value of $59M warrants scrutiny for potential overspending. 3. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract duration of 2084 days indicates a long-term need for these services.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $59M for small arms ammunition manufacturing appears high given the reported base value of $48,000 and a potential ceiling of $62.3M. Further analysis is needed to understand the cost drivers and if this represents fair value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically promotes price discovery and competitive pricing. However, the significant difference between the initial award amount and the potential ceiling warrants investigation into the pricing structure.

Taxpayer Impact: The substantial value of this contract means taxpayers are funding a significant expenditure. Ensuring the price is competitive and reflects true market value is crucial for fiscal responsibility.

Public Impact

Ensures supply of essential small arms ammunition for military operations. Potential for cost overruns could impact overall defense budget allocation. Supports manufacturing jobs within the defense industrial base.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • High contract value relative to initial award.
  • Long contract duration.
  • Potential for cost escalation.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition.
  • Critical defense supply chain.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to ammunition manufacturing. Spending benchmarks in this area can vary widely based on quantity, type, and technological advancements. The $59M value is significant for this niche.

Small Business Impact

The contract does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. While the prime contractor is CONCO, INC., further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army. Oversight would typically involve contract performance monitoring, quality assurance, and financial audits to ensure compliance and value for money.

Related Government Programs

  • Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • High contract ceiling value.
  • Long contract duration.
  • Potential for cost overruns.
  • Lack of specific unit cost data for benchmarking.
  • Risk of technological obsolescence.

Tags

small-arms-ammunition-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ky, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $59.0 million to CONCO, INC.. 200412!001407!2100!W15QKN!TACOM - PICATINNY !W15QKN04C1139 !A!N! !N! ! !20040924!20080930!623757762!623757762!623757762!N!CONCO, INC !4000 OAKLAWN DRIVE !LOUISVILLE !KY!40219!48000!111!21!LOUISVILLE !JEFFERSON !KENTUCKY !+000009700162!N!N!000000000000!J066!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/INSTRUMENTS & LAB EQUIPMENT !A8C!CONTAINERS AND HANDLING EQUIPMENT !000 !* !332992!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CONCO, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $59.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-24. End: 2010-06-09.

What factors justify the significant increase from the initial award amount to the contract's ceiling?

The substantial difference between the initial award of $48,000 and the ceiling of $62,375,776 suggests potential for significant future orders or escalation clauses. Understanding the specific terms, such as quantity variations, material cost adjustments, or the inclusion of options, is crucial to justifying this wide range and ensuring it aligns with anticipated needs and market conditions.

How does the per-unit cost of this ammunition compare to industry benchmarks?

Without specific unit quantities and detailed cost breakdowns, a direct per-unit cost comparison is challenging. However, given the overall contract value and the nature of small arms ammunition, a thorough analysis would involve benchmarking against similar government contracts and commercial pricing for comparable ammunition types to identify any anomalies or potential inefficiencies.

What is the risk of obsolescence or technological displacement for this ammunition over the contract's duration?

The contract spans from 2004 to 2010, a period where military technology can evolve. The risk of obsolescence depends on the specific type of ammunition and the pace of technological advancement in small arms. If newer, more effective, or standardized ammunition types emerge, the procured ammunition could become less relevant, impacting its long-term utility and value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingSmall Arms Ammunition Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4000 OAKLAWN DRIVE, LOUISVILLE, KY, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,447,872

Exercised Options: $12,447,872

Current Obligation: $59,039,849

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-09-24

Current End Date: 2010-06-09

Potential End Date: 2010-06-09 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-08-13

More Contracts from Conco, Inc.

View all Conco, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending