DoD awards $6M radio and license bundle to Leidos, Inc. for electronic computer manufacturing
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $6,038,494 ($6.0M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-12-18
End Date: 2026-08-26
Contract Duration: 251 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: PROCURE RADIO AND LICENSE BUNDLE
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32822
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $6.0 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: PROCURE RADIO AND LICENSE BUNDLE Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for a radio and license bundle, indicating a need for communication or signal processing equipment. 3. Leidos, Inc., a large defense contractor, secured this award. 4. The contract duration is 251 days, suggesting a short-term or specific project need. 5. The award type is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger contract vehicle. 6. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts risk to the contractor. 7. The contract is for electronic computer manufacturing, aligning with NAICS code 334111.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount is $6,038,494. Without specific details on the quantity and type of radios and licenses, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price contract type generally provides cost certainty for the government. Benchmarking against similar procurements for radio and license bundles would be necessary for a more precise evaluation of pricing and value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method of procurement generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and terms for the government. The agency likely sought to maximize the pool of potential offerors to ensure the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down costs through market forces and encourages a wider range of innovative solutions.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from the acquisition of essential radio and license capabilities. The contract supports the delivery of electronic computer manufacturing services related to the radio and license bundle. The contract is geographically located in Florida (FL). The procurement likely impacts the workforce within the electronic computer manufacturing and telecommunications sectors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the radio and license bundle makes it difficult to assess if the most cost-effective solution was procured.
- The short contract duration might indicate a need for rapid deployment, potentially at a premium.
- Without knowing the number of bidders, it's hard to confirm the intensity of competition.
- The reliance on a single delivery order under a potentially larger contract vehicle warrants scrutiny of the overall contract's value and competition.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, maximizing potential bidder participation.
- Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability for the government.
- Leidos, Inc. is an established contractor with experience in defense and technology sectors.
- The contract aligns with a specific NAICS code (334111), suggesting a focused procurement objective.
Sector Analysis
The electronic computer manufacturing sector is a critical component of the defense industrial base, providing essential hardware and systems. This contract, falling under NAICS code 334111, relates to the production of computers and related electronic components. The market for such specialized equipment, particularly when integrated with communication systems like radios and licenses, is often characterized by high technical requirements and significant R&D investment. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other procurements for similar communication hardware bundles within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Leidos, Inc., will likely manage the entire scope of work. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans to small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Leidos voluntarily engages small businesses for specialized components or services not detailed in the award.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is a delivery order, which implies it is issued under a pre-existing contract vehicle. Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Army. Transparency is facilitated by public contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for the contractor regarding cost overruns.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Communication Systems
- Radio and Telecommunications Equipment Procurement
- Electronic Computer Manufacturing Contracts
- Federal IT and Hardware Procurement
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed technical specifications
- Limited information on competition intensity
- Unclear performance metrics
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, leidos-inc, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, electronic-computer-manufacturing, radio-and-license-bundle, florida, communication-systems, naics-334111
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $6.0 million to LEIDOS, INC.. PROCURE RADIO AND LICENSE BUNDLE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $6.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-12-18. End: 2026-08-26.
What specific types of radios and licenses are included in this bundle, and what are their intended operational uses for the Department of the Army?
The provided data does not specify the exact types of radios or licenses procured. However, given the NAICS code 334111 (Electronic Computer Manufacturing) and the general nature of such procurements, these could range from tactical communication radios for field operations to specialized licensing for secure communication networks or spectrum usage. The intended operational uses are likely related to enhancing command and control, situational awareness, or data transmission capabilities for Army personnel and units. Further details would be found in the contract's statement of work or technical specifications, which are not publicly available in this summary.
How does the $6.04 million award compare to historical spending on similar radio and license bundles by the Department of the Army?
A direct comparison to historical spending on identical radio and license bundles is not possible with the provided data alone. To perform such an analysis, one would need to query federal procurement databases (like FPDS or USASpending) for contracts with similar descriptions, NAICS codes (334111), and agencies (Department of the Army) over a relevant period. Factors such as the quantity, technological sophistication, and specific features of the radios and licenses would significantly influence cost. Without these comparative data points, it's difficult to ascertain if $6.04 million represents a high, low, or average expenditure for this type of procurement.
What is Leidos, Inc.'s track record with the Department of the Army, particularly in providing electronic computer manufacturing or communication systems?
Leidos, Inc. is a major government contractor with a substantial history of awards across various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and the Department of the Army. They have a known presence in IT services, systems integration, and defense solutions. Their track record typically includes large-scale contracts for technology development, hardware provision, and support services. Specific to electronic computer manufacturing and communication systems, Leidos has been involved in numerous projects, often involving complex integration and manufacturing capabilities. A detailed review of their contract history with the Army would reveal the volume and nature of past awards, performance ratings, and any significant issues or successes.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract, and how will they be measured?
The provided award data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics for this contract. Typically, for procurements involving hardware and licenses, KPIs might include delivery timelines, adherence to technical specifications, functionality testing results, reliability rates, and warranty support. The success of the contract would be measured against the requirements outlined in the contract's statement of work and any associated performance standards. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would usually be responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring that the delivered goods and services meet the agreed-upon standards.
Given the firm fixed-price nature, what is the potential risk of cost overruns for the government, and what mechanisms are in place to mitigate this?
The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is designed to place the cost risk on the contractor. This means that Leidos, Inc. is obligated to complete the work for the agreed-upon price, regardless of their actual costs. The government's risk of cost overruns is therefore minimal under an FFP contract, assuming the scope of work is well-defined. Mitigation mechanisms primarily involve robust contract definition and oversight. The government's responsibility lies in clearly defining the requirements and specifications. If the contractor encounters unforeseen difficulties that increase their costs, they absorb those losses. Conversely, if they complete the work under budget, they retain the profit. The primary risk to the government with FFP is potentially paying a premium if the contractor overestimates costs due to uncertainty, or if the scope is not perfectly defined and leads to change orders.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing › Electronic Computer Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Address: 1750 PRESIDENTS ST, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $6,038,494
Exercised Options: $6,038,494
Current Obligation: $6,038,494
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W15P7T23D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-12-18
Current End Date: 2026-08-26
Potential End Date: 2026-08-26 12:08:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-18
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)