DoD's $21M contract for engineering services awarded to ARINC, with Booz Allen Hamilton as a potential competitor
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,980,030 ($21.0M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-22
End Date: 2011-10-31
Contract Duration: 1,865 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200612!008717!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !GS10F0255M !C!N! !Y!W15P7T06F0052! !20060922!20110430!075916762!075916762!101458586!N!ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL!2551 RIVA RD !ANNAPOLIS !MD!21401!01600!003!24!ANNAPOLIS !ANNE ARUNDEL !MARYLAND !+000001324811!N!N!000000000000!R409!PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: LINTHICUM HEIGHTS, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21090
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.0 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 200612!008717!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !GS10F0255M !C!N! !Y!W15P7T06F0052! !20060922!20110430!075916762!075916762!101458586!N!ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL!2551 RIVA RD !ANNAPOLIS !MD!21401!01600!003!24!ANNAPOLIS !ANNE… Key points: 1. The contract value of $21 million appears reasonable for the duration and scope of engineering services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract was awarded to ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL, with Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC noted as a competitor. 4. The contract duration of approximately 5 years provides a stable period for service delivery. 5. The primary service category is 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES', indicating a focus on strategic and operational improvements. 6. The contract was issued as a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's total value of approximately $21 million over nearly five years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' contracts within the Department of Defense would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the use of full and open competition implies that pricing was likely scrutinized by multiple bidders, which generally leads to more competitive rates.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data does not specify the number of bids received, but the designation suggests a robust competitive environment. This approach is designed to foster price discovery and ensure the government receives the best value through market forces.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through competitive bidding, leading to more efficient use of public funds.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense is the primary beneficiary, receiving program review and development services. Services delivered likely include analysis, strategic planning, and potentially process improvement recommendations. The geographic impact is centered within the Department of Defense's operational areas, likely within the United States. The contract supports a workforce of engineers and analysts involved in program development and review.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on performance metrics and outcomes makes it difficult to fully assess effectiveness.
- The 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' category is broad and could encompass a wide range of activities, necessitating further clarification on the specific tasks performed.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent procurement process.
- The contract duration of nearly five years indicates a stable, long-term need for these services.
- The use of a delivery order under a contract vehicle suggests an existing framework that may streamline future procurements.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on management and technical consulting. The Department of Defense is a significant consumer of such services to support its complex operations and strategic planning. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for program review, development, and engineering support within federal agencies, particularly those with large-scale operational needs.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this specific contract, as it was not set aside for small businesses and the prime contractor is not identified as a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses, which could still provide some benefit to the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the awarding agency, the Department of Defense, through its contracting officers and program managers. The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) may also play a role in contract administration. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, but detailed performance reports and Inspector General reviews would provide deeper accountability insights.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) services
- Program Management Support Services
- Engineering and Technical Consulting Services
- Federal IT Consulting Contracts
- Department of Defense Professional Services
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics
- Broad service category definition
- Limited information on number of bidders
Tags
department-of-defense, engineering-services, program-review, development-services, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, maryland, arinc-engineering-services, booz-allen-hamilton, professional-services, consulting-services, defense-contract-management-agency
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.0 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC. 200612!008717!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !GS10F0255M !C!N! !Y!W15P7T06F0052! !20060922!20110430!075916762!075916762!101458586!N!ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL!2551 RIVA RD !ANNAPOLIS !MD!21401!01600!003!24!ANNAPOLIS !ANNE ARUNDEL !MARYLAND !+000001324811!N!N!000000000000!R409!PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-22. End: 2011-10-31.
What specific types of 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' were rendered under this contract?
The provided data categorizes the service under 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' (NAICS 541614 - Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services) and 'ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP' (PSC R409). This suggests the services likely involved the review and development of programs related to defense electronics and communication equipment. Specific tasks could include analyzing the effectiveness of existing systems, recommending improvements, developing new program strategies, or assessing the lifecycle management of communication technologies. Without more granular details from the contract's statement of work, the precise nature of these services remains generalized.
How does the $21 million contract value compare to similar DoD engineering services contracts?
The $21 million contract value over approximately 5 years translates to an average annual spend of around $4.2 million. This figure is moderate within the context of large federal contracts, especially for the Department of Defense. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to benchmark against contracts with similar scopes (program review, development, engineering services) and durations awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies. Factors like the specific technical expertise required, the level of security clearance needed, and the criticality of the programs supported would influence pricing. However, the use of full and open competition suggests that this value was likely arrived at through a competitive process, implying reasonable market-based pricing.
What is the track record of ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL in delivering similar services to the DoD?
The data indicates ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL was awarded this specific contract. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their past performance on other DoD contracts, particularly those involving program review, development, and engineering services. This would involve looking at contract history, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any documented issues or successes. A comprehensive review of their portfolio and client feedback would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability in delivering complex engineering and program management solutions.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how was performance measured?
The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or details on how ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL's performance was measured. Typically, contracts of this nature would include metrics related to the quality of deliverables, adherence to timelines, cost control, and client satisfaction. Performance would likely be assessed through regular progress reports, technical reviews, and potentially formal evaluations by the contracting officer's representative (COR). The absence of this information in the summary data highlights a gap in understanding the contract's success criteria and oversight.
What is the historical spending trend for 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' within the DoD?
The provided data focuses on a single contract and does not offer historical spending trends for 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' within the DoD. To analyze such trends, one would need access to broader federal procurement data, allowing for aggregation and analysis of spending across multiple contracts, agencies, and fiscal years within this service category. This would involve examining the evolution of spending, identifying major contract vehicles, and understanding the factors driving demand for these services within the DoD over time.
Were there any significant risks identified during the procurement or execution of this contract?
The provided data does not explicitly detail any significant risks identified during the procurement or execution of this contract. However, general risks associated with large-scale engineering and program development contracts can include scope creep, technical challenges, contractor performance issues, budget overruns, and schedule delays. The use of full and open competition aims to mitigate some procurement risks by ensuring a competitive environment. Post-award, risk management would depend on the agency's oversight mechanisms, contractor's internal controls, and the clarity of the contract's statement of work.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)
Address: 900 ELKRIDGE LANDING RD, LINTHICUM, MD, 21090
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $41,291,622
Exercised Options: $19,370,956
Current Obligation: $20,980,030
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0255M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-22
Current End Date: 2011-10-31
Potential End Date: 2011-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-05-09
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC
- Avionics IT Based Software Support — $246.8M (General Services Administration)
- - Option Years 3 and 4 for Avionics Gst0810bp0059 001 — $188.9M (General Services Administration)
- 200112!000181!5700!GZ04 !smc/Pkr Contract Mgmt Office !gs35f4825g !c!n!*!n!f0470101f7014 !20010416!20020331!101458586!101458586!101458586!n!arinc, Incorporated !2551 Riva Road !annapolis !md!21401!01600!003!24!annapolis !anne Arundel !maryland !+000018932050!n!n!000000000000!7030!adp Software !A2 !missile and Space Systems !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541710!*!*!6! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*! ! !A ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $186.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200411!007888!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !daab0703db006 !A!N! !Y!0079 ! !20040804!20070130!075916762!075916762!101458586!n!arinc Engineering Services, LL!2551 Riva Road !annapolis !md!21401!01600!003!24!annapolis !anne Arundel !maryland !+000005940000!n!n!000000000000!r414!systems Engineering Services !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!y!2!014!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!z!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $102.1M (Department of Defense)
- 200411!007677!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !daab0703db006 !A!N! !Y!0076 ! !20040802!20050130!075916762!075916762!101458586!n!arinc Engineering Services, LL!2551 Riva Road !annapolis !md!21401!01600!003!24!annapolis !anne Arundel !maryland !+000006336000!n!n!000000000000!r414!systems Engineering Services !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!y!2!014!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!z!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $76.4M (Department of Defense)
View all Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)