DoD's $26.3M CIED Training Contract Awarded to Leidos Inc. Amidst Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,342,456 ($26.3M)
Contractor: Leidos Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-04
End Date: 2011-11-11
Contract Duration: 798 days
Daily Burn Rate: $33.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: COUNTER IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (CIED) TRAINING
Place of Performance
Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $26.3 million to LEIDOS INC for work described as: COUNTER IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (CIED) TRAINING Key points: 1. Leidos Inc. secured a $26.3 million contract for Counter Improvised Explosive Device (CIED) training. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically Engineering Services, indicating specialized technical support.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure allows for cost reimbursement plus a fixed fee, which can incentivize contractor efficiency but also carries the risk of cost escalation if not closely monitored. Benchmarking against similar CPFF contracts for specialized training services is necessary for a full assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The award was made under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently, with pricing driven by market forces rather than sole-source limitations.
Public Impact
Ensures readiness for military personnel by providing critical training against improvised explosive devices. Supports the development of advanced training methodologies and technologies in a high-stakes security environment. Contributes to the overall effectiveness of military operations in conflict zones where IEDs are a significant threat.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to higher costs if not managed effectively.
- Contract duration of 798 days (over 2 years) requires sustained oversight.
- Potential for scope creep in training requirements over the contract period.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
- Contract addresses a critical national security need (CIED training).
- Experienced contractor (Leidos Inc.) likely possesses relevant expertise.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically for Engineering Services related to specialized training. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and adapting to evolving threats like improvised explosive devices. Benchmarks for similar specialized defense training contracts would provide further context.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific subcontracting goals or participation by small businesses in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense, through its contracting agencies like the Defense Contract Management Agency, is responsible for overseeing this contract. Robust oversight is essential to manage the CPFF structure, ensure performance standards are met, and control costs effectively.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure.
- Need for sustained oversight due to contract duration.
- Risk of scope creep impacting budget and effectiveness.
- Lack of specific small business participation data.
- Effectiveness dependent on quality of training delivery and adaptation to evolving threats.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $26.3 million to LEIDOS INC. COUNTER IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (CIED) TRAINING
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-04. End: 2011-11-11.
What was the specific performance criteria used to evaluate proposals under the full and open competition?
While the data indicates full and open competition, it does not specify the evaluation criteria. Typically, such criteria would include technical approach, past performance, management capability, and price. A thorough review of the solicitation documents would reveal the exact performance metrics and their weighting in the selection process.
How effectively was the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure managed to control costs and prevent overruns?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure requires diligent oversight to manage costs. Without access to performance reports and financial audits, it's difficult to assess the effectiveness of cost control. Regular reviews of incurred costs against the fixed fee and the contract ceiling are crucial for preventing overruns and ensuring value for taxpayer money.
What was the impact of Leidos Inc.'s specific expertise on the effectiveness of the CIED training provided?
Leidos Inc. is a large government contractor with a broad range of technical and engineering capabilities. Their specific expertise in areas relevant to CIED, such as simulation, technology integration, and curriculum development, likely contributed to the effectiveness of the training. However, a definitive assessment would require evaluating training outcomes and feedback.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0002409R3373
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 11951 FREEDOM DR, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $32,268,547
Exercised Options: $32,268,547
Current Obligation: $26,342,456
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4119
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-04
Current End Date: 2011-11-11
Potential End Date: 2011-11-11 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-07-26
More Contracts from Leidos Inc
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)