General Electric awarded $37.9M sole-source contract for F110 engine repair, raising value-for-money questions
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $37,901,331 ($37.9M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-02-22
End Date: 2017-07-31
Contract Duration: 525 days
Daily Burn Rate: $72.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: F110 ENGINE REPAIR
Place of Performance
Location: CINCINNATI, HAMILTON County, OHIO, 45215
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $37.9 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: F110 ENGINE REPAIR Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price competition and potentially increasing costs. 2. The contract duration of 525 days suggests a significant need for ongoing engine maintenance. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs, but the lack of competition is a concern. 4. The specific repair services are critical for maintaining operational readiness of aircraft. 5. The contract falls under the Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing NAICS code.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this sole-source contract is challenging due to the lack of competitive bids. While the firm fixed-price structure provides some cost certainty, the absence of competition means there's no market-driven validation of the pricing. Without comparable contract data or a competitive bidding process, it's difficult to definitively assess if the government received the best possible value for the F110 engine repair services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded using a sole-source justification, meaning it was not competed. This approach is typically used when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. The lack of competition means that potential alternative providers or more cost-effective solutions were not explored through a bidding process, which can impact price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium for these services due to the absence of competitive pressure to drive down costs. The government did not benefit from the potential for lower prices that a competitive solicitation could have yielded.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the entities operating aircraft equipped with F110 engines, ensuring their continued operational capability. The services delivered include essential repair and maintenance for critical aircraft engine components. The geographic impact is likely concentrated where F110-equipped aircraft are stationed or maintained. Workforce implications include the need for skilled technicians to perform the specialized engine repairs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potential cost savings.
- Lack of transparency in pricing due to non-competitive nature.
- Potential for cost overruns if not closely managed, despite fixed-price structure.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- General Electric is a known and established provider of F110 engines and related services.
- Contract ensures continued operational readiness for critical aircraft.
Sector Analysis
The aerospace and defense industry is characterized by high barriers to entry, specialized manufacturing capabilities, and significant R&D investment. Contracts for engine repair and maintenance are crucial for sustaining the operational readiness of military and commercial fleets. Spending in this sector often involves long-term sustainment contracts, with a significant portion of the market dominated by original equipment manufacturers due to proprietary knowledge and specialized tooling. The $37.9 million awarded here represents a portion of the broader defense sustainment spending.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, nor is there information indicating subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The award to a large prime contractor like General Electric suggests that the primary focus is on the prime's capability to perform the specialized engine repair, rather than leveraging the small business industrial base for this specific requirement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), responsible for ensuring compliance with contract terms and financial accountability. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source award, but contract performance metrics and delivery schedules would be monitored.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Engine Maintenance
- Defense Logistics Agency Contracts
- F-16 Fighter Jet Support
- F-15 Fighter Jet Support
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for price inflation
Tags
defense, aircraft-engine-repair, general-electric, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, defense-logistics-agency, ohio, f110-engine, sustainment, major-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $37.9 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. F110 ENGINE REPAIR
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $37.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-02-22. End: 2017-07-31.
What is the historical spending trend for F110 engine repair by the Department of Defense?
Analyzing historical spending for F110 engine repair requires access to detailed contract databases and budget allocations over several fiscal years. Generally, sustainment and repair contracts for major defense assets like aircraft engines represent a significant and recurring expenditure. Factors influencing spending include the operational tempo of aircraft fleets, the age of the engines, and the availability of spare parts. Without specific historical data for this particular contract vehicle or similar sole-source awards, it's difficult to establish a precise trend. However, it is common for the DoD to allocate substantial funds annually towards maintaining its aging aircraft inventory, which includes extensive engine support.
How does the $37.9 million contract value compare to other F110 engine repair contracts?
Direct comparison of this $37.9 million contract value to other F110 engine repair contracts is challenging without knowing the specific scope of work, duration, and whether those other contracts were also sole-source or competitively awarded. However, for major engine components, repair contracts can range from several million to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the complexity of the repair, the number of engines serviced, and the required turnaround time. Given that this is a sole-source award for a specific period (525 days), the value appears substantial, underscoring the critical nature of F110 engine sustainment. A competitive process might have yielded a different price point.
What are the specific risks associated with a sole-source award for critical engine repairs?
The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for critical engine repairs is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competitive pressure. The government may not achieve the best possible value for its expenditure. Additionally, there's a risk of vendor lock-in, where the government becomes overly reliant on a single provider, potentially limiting flexibility in future procurement decisions or sustainment strategies. Without competition, there's also less incentive for the sole provider to innovate or offer cost-saving efficiencies beyond what is contractually mandated. Effective oversight and negotiation become paramount to mitigate these risks.
What performance metrics are likely being used to evaluate General Electric's service delivery under this contract?
Performance metrics for such a contract would likely focus on key areas critical to engine sustainment and operational readiness. These could include on-time delivery of repaired engines, adherence to quality standards and specifications, turnaround time for repairs, and the defect rate of repaired components. The contract may also include metrics related to cost control and compliance with reporting requirements. The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) would typically monitor these metrics to ensure the contractor is meeting its obligations and delivering the required level of performance.
What is General Electric's track record with F110 engine maintenance and repair for the DoD?
General Electric (GE) has a long-standing and extensive track record as the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) for the F110 engine, which powers various U.S. Air Force and Navy aircraft, including the F-16 and F-15. GE is a primary provider of maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) services for these engines. Their track record is generally characterized by deep technical expertise and a critical role in ensuring the operational readiness of these platforms. While specific performance data for individual contracts varies, GE's position as the OEM implies a significant capability and historical involvement in F110 sustainment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 NEUMANN WAY, CINCINNATI, OH, 45215
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $37,901,331
Exercised Options: $37,901,331
Current Obligation: $37,901,331
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: SPE4AX16D9408
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-02-22
Current End Date: 2017-07-31
Potential End Date: 2017-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-06-07
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)