DOJ's $10.5M consulting BPA with High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC awarded in 2006, ending 2009

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,479,741 ($10.5M)

Contractor: High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2006-09-15

End Date: 2009-10-15

Contract Duration: 1,126 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.3K/day

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20530

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $10.5 million to HIGH PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract provided management consulting services, a broad category with varying value. 2. Competition dynamics for this specific BPA are not detailed, making direct value assessment challenging. 3. The contract duration of over three years suggests a sustained need for services. 4. Performance context is limited without specific task order details or outcomes. 5. This contract falls within the broader 'Other Management Consulting Services' sector. 6. The award was a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), indicating a streamlined procurement method for anticipated needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $10.5 million BPA is difficult without specific task order details and the services rendered. As a BPA, it represents a ceiling for potential spending rather than a guaranteed expenditure. Comparing it to similar consulting contracts requires understanding the scope and complexity of the services provided to the Department of Justice's Offices, Boards and Divisions. The lack of detailed performance metrics or comparative pricing for specific services makes a definitive value-for-money assessment challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition level for this Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) is not specified in the provided data. BPAs are typically established under existing indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts or other agreements, and their competition can vary widely. Without knowing the underlying contract or the specific solicitation for this BPA, it's impossible to determine how many bidders were involved or the extent of the competition. This lack of transparency hinders an assessment of whether the pricing reflects competitive market forces.

Taxpayer Impact: When competition is limited or unknown for consulting services, taxpayers may not benefit from the most cost-effective solutions, potentially leading to higher overall spending.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice benefited from management consulting services to support its various offices, boards, and divisions. The services likely aimed to improve operational efficiency, strategic planning, or program management within the agency. The geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, where the DOJ is headquartered. Workforce implications could include support for DOJ staff or the engagement of specialized consultants.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the consulting services.
The broad nature of 'Other Management Consulting Services' can sometimes obscure the specific value delivered.
Limited information on competition raises questions about potential price efficiencies.

Positive Signals

The establishment of a BPA suggests a recognized need for ongoing consulting support by the Department of Justice.
The contract was awarded to a specific company, indicating a selection process was undertaken.
The duration of the BPA implies a level of satisfaction or continued requirement for the contractor's services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Management Consulting Services' category, which is a significant segment of the professional services market supporting government agencies. The federal government frequently procures management and professional services to assist with strategic planning, organizational improvements, and specialized project execution. Benchmarking this $10.5 million BPA against other federal consulting contracts requires a detailed understanding of the specific services rendered, as consulting rates and project values can vary dramatically based on expertise and scope.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate whether this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. As a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), it may have been established under a larger contract that had small business provisions, or it could have been competed more broadly. Without specific details on the BPA's terms, its direct impact on the small business ecosystem remains unclear.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Justice's internal procurement and program management offices. As a BPA, task orders issued against it would likely have their own specific oversight and reporting requirements. Transparency is limited by the lack of detailed public information regarding the specific services performed and their outcomes. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Management and Consulting Services
Professional Services Contracts
Department of Justice Contracts
Blanket Purchase Agreements

Risk Flags

Limited transparency on competition
Lack of defined performance metrics
Broad service category obscures specific value

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $10.5 million to HIGH PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HIGH PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-15. End: 2009-10-15.

What specific types of management consulting services were provided under this BPA?

The provided data categorizes this contract under 'Other Management Consulting Services' (NAICS code 541618). This is a broad category that can encompass a wide range of activities, including strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, program management support, and general management advice. Without access to the specific task orders issued against this Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), it is impossible to determine the precise nature of the services rendered. The Department of Justice likely utilized these services to address specific operational challenges, enhance efficiency, or support key initiatives within its various offices, boards, and divisions.

How does the $10.5 million total award value compare to similar consulting contracts within the Department of Justice?

Comparing the $10.5 million award value of this Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) to similar contracts within the Department of Justice (DOJ) is challenging without more granular data. The $10.5 million represents the ceiling value for the BPA, not necessarily the amount actually spent. The DOJ procures a wide array of consulting services, ranging from highly specialized technical consulting to broader management support. The value of such contracts can vary significantly based on the duration, scope, complexity, and the specific expertise required. To make a meaningful comparison, one would need to identify other consulting BPAs or contracts within the DOJ of similar duration and scope, and analyze their awarded values and actual expenditures.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for the services provided by High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC?

The provided data does not include information on the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics established for the services rendered by High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC under this Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA). For consulting contracts, especially those under a BPA where multiple task orders might be issued, KPIs are typically defined at the task order level. These metrics would be tailored to the specific objectives of each engagement, such as improvements in process efficiency, successful implementation of strategic plans, or achievement of specific project milestones. Without access to the individual task orders or a performance review, assessing the contractor's performance and the overall success of the engagements is not possible.

What is the historical spending pattern for 'Other Management Consulting Services' at the Department of Justice?

Analyzing the historical spending pattern for 'Other Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541618) at the Department of Justice (DOJ) requires access to comprehensive federal procurement data beyond this single contract. This $10.5 million BPA awarded in 2006 represents a small fraction of the DOJ's overall spending on consulting services over time. To understand the broader pattern, one would need to examine the DOJ's procurement history over several fiscal years, identifying all contracts awarded under NAICS 541618 and related consulting codes. This would reveal trends in spending levels, the types of consulting services most frequently procured, the primary contractors, and the average contract values, providing a more complete picture of the DOJ's reliance on external management consulting expertise.

Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with this contract, and how were they mitigated?

The provided data does not explicitly detail any specific risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) with High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC. Typical risks associated with management consulting contracts can include scope creep, contractor performance issues, budget overruns, or a misalignment between delivered services and agency needs. Mitigation strategies often involve robust contract management, clear definition of deliverables and performance standards in task orders, regular progress reviews, and open communication channels between the contracting agency and the contractor. Without specific information on issues that may have arisen, it's impossible to assess the effectiveness of any mitigation efforts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Other Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Contractor Details

Address: 11955 FREEDOM DRIVE, RESTON, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJJ04F0896

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline