DOJ's $17.6M Management Consulting Contract Awarded to High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,605,309 ($17.6M)

Contractor: High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2009-10-16

End Date: 2013-11-28

Contract Duration: 1,504 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: Other

Official Description: INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20530

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $17.6 million to HIGH PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC for work described as: INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1504 days indicates a significant, long-term need for services. 3. Services provided fall under 'Other Management Consulting Services,' a broad category. 4. The contract was awarded to a single vendor, High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC. 5. The contract was awarded as a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), often used for recurring needs. 6. The contract was active from late 2009 to late 2013.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific deliverables and performance metrics. The total award amount of approximately $17.6 million over four years suggests a moderate annual spend for management consulting services within a large federal agency like the Department of Justice. Without comparable contract data for similar 'Infrastructure Program Management Support' services, it's difficult to definitively assess if the pricing was competitive or represented good value for money. The absence of detailed performance reports or cost breakdowns limits a thorough value-for-money assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded. This suggests a potentially complex procurement process. The specific reasons for excluding sources are not detailed, which could impact the breadth of competition. The number of bidders is not specified, making it difficult to fully assess the level of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The 'full and open' nature, even with exclusions, generally aims to secure competitive pricing for taxpayers. However, the exclusion of certain sources might have limited the most competitive offers.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice benefits from enhanced infrastructure program management support. Services likely improved the efficiency and effectiveness of various DOJ infrastructure projects. The contract supported the operational needs of the Offices, Boards and Divisions within the DOJ. The primary impact is on the internal operations and administrative functions of the DOJ. Geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, where the DOJ is headquartered. Workforce implications are primarily related to the consulting services provided, not direct hiring.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it hard to gauge the effectiveness of the consulting services.
  • The exclusion of sources in a 'full and open' competition raises questions about the extent of true market engagement.
  • Limited information on the specific deliverables and outcomes achieved by the contractor.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through a competitive process, indicating an effort to find suitable vendors.
  • The contract was a Blanket Purchase Agreement, suggesting a structured approach to recurring needs.
  • The duration of the contract implies a sustained need and potential for building expertise.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Management Consulting services sector, a significant area of federal spending. The federal government frequently procures consulting services to support program management, strategic planning, and operational improvements across various agencies. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. This specific contract, focused on 'Infrastructure Program Management Support,' addresses a critical need for agencies managing complex projects and assets. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large federal contracts for similar management consulting services, often categorized under NAICS code 541618.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The primary contractor, High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC, would be responsible for its own staffing and resource allocation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of Justice, likely through contracting officers and program managers responsible for the Offices, Boards and Divisions. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the Blanket Purchase Agreement and any task orders issued. Transparency is limited by the available public data; detailed performance reports or Inspector General findings related to this specific contract are not readily accessible. The nature of consulting contracts often means oversight focuses on deliverable acceptance and adherence to scope.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Justice IT Support Contracts
  • Federal Management and Consulting Services
  • Infrastructure Project Management
  • Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
  • Government Program Management Support

Risk Flags

  • Limited transparency on specific deliverables and performance metrics.
  • Exclusion of sources in 'full and open' competition warrants further investigation.
  • Lack of detailed cost breakdown or pricing analysis.

Tags

department-of-justice, management-consulting, infrastructure-program-management, high-performance-technologies-innovations-llc, full-and-open-competition, blanket-purchase-agreement, district-of-columbia, professional-services, federal-contract, consulting-services, offices-boards-and-divisions, 2009-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $17.6 million to HIGH PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC. INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HIGH PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-10-16. End: 2013-11-28.

What specific infrastructure programs did High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC support within the Department of Justice?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT' under NAICS code 541618 (Other Management Consulting Services). However, it does not specify which particular infrastructure programs within the Department of Justice (DOJ) were supported. This level of detail would typically be found in the task orders issued under the Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) or in internal DOJ program documentation. The 'Offices, Boards and Divisions' (OBD) is a broad component of the DOJ, suggesting the support could have been for a range of administrative or operational infrastructure needs rather than specific large-scale construction or IT infrastructure projects. Without access to the BPA's task orders or specific DOJ program descriptions, the exact programs remain unidentified.

How does the $17.6 million award compare to typical spending on management consulting services by the DOJ?

Comparing the $17.6 million award for 'INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT' to typical DOJ spending on management consulting requires broader data. The Department of Justice, as a large federal agency, procures a significant volume of consulting services annually across various categories. This $17.6 million contract, spanning approximately four years (1504 days), represents an average annual spend of roughly $4.4 million. This figure is moderate when considered against the total IT and professional services spending of a department like the DOJ. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to analyze historical DOJ spending data for NAICS code 541618 and similar service categories, looking at the average contract size, total annual expenditure, and the number of contracts awarded within a given fiscal year. Without that aggregated data, this contract's size appears reasonable for a long-term support role within a major agency.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables expected under this contract. Contracts for 'Other Management Consulting Services' often include deliverables such as strategic plans, process improvement recommendations, organizational assessments, program reviews, and operational efficiency analyses. Performance would typically be evaluated based on the quality, timeliness, and impact of these deliverables, as well as the contractor's adherence to project scope and budget. The absence of specific KPIs in the summary data makes it impossible to objectively assess the contractor's performance or the success of the services provided. These details would normally be outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) within the contract documentation.

Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with this contract during its performance period?

The available data does not explicitly list risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this contract. However, general risks associated with management consulting contracts of this nature and duration could include scope creep, difficulties in integrating consultant recommendations into agency operations, challenges in measuring the impact of consulting services, potential for vendor lock-in, and ensuring the quality and consistency of the services provided. The procurement method, 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' might also imply pre-existing complexities or specific requirements that could pose challenges. Without specific reports or contract close-out documentation, identifying realized risks is not possible from this summary.

What is the track record of High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Justice?

The provided data identifies High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC as the contractor for this $17.6 million DOJ contract. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their broader federal contract history. This would involve searching federal procurement databases (like FPDS or USASpending) for other contracts awarded to this company, noting the agencies involved, contract values, services provided, and performance history (if available). Information on past performance, including any awards, terminations, or disputes, would be crucial. Without this broader search, it's difficult to establish a comprehensive track record beyond this single contract. However, being awarded a multi-year, multi-million dollar contract by the DOJ suggests they met the agency's requirements at the time of award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesOther Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Dynamics Research Corporation (UEI: 001014182)

Address: 11955 FREEDOM DRIVE, RESTON, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $52,257,382

Exercised Options: $23,382,410

Current Obligation: $17,605,309

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJJ04F0896

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-10-16

Current End Date: 2013-11-28

Potential End Date: 2013-11-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-06-17

More Contracts from High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC

View all High Performance Technologies Innovations, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending