Treasury's $11.6M EXFIRS contract with Unisys for IT services awarded via competitive delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,606,636 ($11.6M)

Contractor: Unisys Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2007-05-01

End Date: 2017-08-31

Contract Duration: 3,775 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: TIPSS III - EXFIRS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: LANHAM, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20706

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $11.6 million to UNISYS CORPORATION for work described as: TIPSS III - EXFIRS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Key points: 1. The contract value of $11.6 million over 10 years suggests a moderate investment in IT systems. 2. Competition was present, indicated by the 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER' award type. 3. The risk appears moderate, given the long duration and cost-plus incentive fee structure. 4. The sector is Information Technology, specifically Computer Systems Design Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's cost-plus incentive fee structure can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar IT system development contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

Awarded as a competitive delivery order, suggesting multiple vendors likely competed. The pricing was likely determined through a competitive bidding process, aiming for best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for IT system development. The competitive nature should have driven reasonable pricing, but the cost-plus structure introduces potential for higher costs than fixed-price contracts.

Public Impact

Enhances IRS capabilities for tax processing and data management. Supports critical government functions related to tax administration. Long-term contract indicates a sustained need for these IT services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost-plus contracts can incentivize spending.
  • Long contract duration may not reflect current technological needs.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics makes oversight challenging.

Positive Signals

  • Competitive award suggests potential for good value.
  • Incentive fee structure aims to align contractor and government goals.
  • Supports essential IRS operations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically computer systems design. Spending benchmarks for similar government IT development projects vary widely based on complexity and scope, but $11.6 million over a decade is a substantial investment.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Treasury's Internal Revenue Service. Oversight would typically involve program managers monitoring performance and costs, especially given the cost-plus incentive fee structure.

Related Government Programs

  • Computer Systems Design Services
  • Department of the Treasury Contracting
  • Internal Revenue Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost-plus contracts can lead to cost overruns.
  • Long contract duration may result in outdated technology.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics.
  • No small business participation noted.

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, department-of-the-treasury, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $11.6 million to UNISYS CORPORATION. TIPSS III - EXFIRS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is UNISYS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-05-01. End: 2017-08-31.

Was the incentive fee structure effectively utilized to control costs and ensure performance?

The effectiveness of the incentive fee structure is difficult to ascertain without detailed performance data and cost analysis. Cost-plus contracts inherently carry a risk of cost escalation. The 'fair' value rating suggests that while competition was present, the final cost may not have been optimal due to the contract type and potential for scope creep over the decade-long period.

What was the specific impact of the 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER' on the final price and quality of services?

A competitive delivery order implies that multiple vendors were considered, which generally leads to better pricing and quality than a sole-source award. However, the 'cost plus incentive fee' structure means the final price is not fixed and depends on incurred costs plus an incentive fee. The competitive aspect likely ensured a reasonable starting point, but ongoing management was crucial to realize true value.

How did the long duration (2007-2017) of this contract affect its overall effectiveness and value for money?

A 10-year contract duration for IT systems can be a double-edged sword. It provides stability and allows for deep integration, but it also risks obsolescence if technology evolves rapidly. The value for money depends heavily on whether the system remained relevant and efficient throughout its lifecycle. Without specific performance metrics and post-contract reviews, assessing its long-term effectiveness is challenging.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 11720 PLAZA AMERICA DR, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,606,636

Exercised Options: $11,606,636

Current Obligation: $11,606,636

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: TIRNO06D00010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-05-01

Current End Date: 2017-08-31

Potential End Date: 2017-08-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-26

More Contracts from Unisys Corporation

View all Unisys Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending