DoD's $55.9M contract for aircraft engine parts awarded to General Electric, raising questions about competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $55,864,933 ($55.9M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-06-14
End Date: 2024-05-31
Contract Duration: 352 days
Daily Burn Rate: $158.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 8509952020!PBL MATERIAL GE
Place of Performance
Location: CINCINNATI, HAMILTON County, OHIO, 45215
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $55.9 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: 8509952020!PBL MATERIAL GE Key points: 1. The contract's value of $55.9 million represents a significant investment in maintaining critical aircraft engine components. 2. Awarded to a single source, the lack of competitive bidding warrants scrutiny regarding potential price inflation. 3. The duration of the contract, spanning over a year, suggests a sustained need for these specialized parts. 4. The specific nature of the parts (PBL MATERIAL GE) indicates a focus on sustainment and readiness for military aircraft. 5. The contract's classification under Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing highlights a key industrial capability within the defense sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without comparable sole-source awards for similar GE aircraft engine parts. However, the absence of competition inherently limits the government's ability to secure the best possible pricing. The firm-fixed-price structure provides some cost certainty, but the lack of competitive pressure means the government may not be realizing optimal value for its investment. Further analysis would require access to historical pricing data for similar sole-source procurements or internal cost estimates.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one bidder, General Electric Company, was solicited. This approach is typically justified when only one responsible source is available or when there is a compelling justification for other reasons. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from the price discovery mechanisms that typically occur in a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to higher costs.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium for these aircraft engine parts due to the absence of competitive bidding. The sole-source award limits the government's leverage to negotiate the lowest possible price, directly impacting the efficient use of public funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. military branches relying on aircraft powered by engines manufactured by General Electric, ensuring operational readiness. The services delivered involve the provision of essential 'PBL MATERIAL GE' for aircraft engines, crucial for maintenance and repair. The geographic impact is primarily within the United States, supporting military bases and operations nationwide. Workforce implications include the continued employment of skilled technicians and engineers at General Electric involved in the manufacturing and supply of these critical components.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition, potentially increasing costs for taxpayers.
- Lack of transparency in the sole-source justification process.
- Dependence on a single supplier for critical aircraft engine parts could pose supply chain risks.
- No clear mechanism for evaluating alternative suppliers or technologies.
Positive Signals
- Award to a known, established manufacturer (General Electric) with a track record in aerospace.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Focus on 'PBL MATERIAL' suggests a commitment to sustainment and readiness.
- Contract duration indicates a stable, long-term need for these parts.
Sector Analysis
The defense industrial base heavily relies on specialized manufacturers like General Electric for critical components such as aircraft engines and their parts. This contract falls within the 'Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing' sector, a high-value, technology-intensive industry. Spending in this sector is driven by military readiness requirements and the lifecycle sustainment of aging aircraft fleets. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish for sole-source awards, but the overall defense aerospace market is substantial, with significant government investment in R&D, procurement, and sustainment.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to involve a small business set-aside, as it was awarded directly to General Electric Company. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The sole-source nature of the award limits the potential for small businesses to participate as prime contractors or to gain new business through a competitive process. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be necessary to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), responsible for ensuring compliance with contract terms and financial accountability. The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Contracting Office would also have oversight responsibilities. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature, but contract modifications and performance reports would be subject to review. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Engine Maintenance and Repair Contracts
- Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Procurement
- General Electric Military Engine Programs
- Sole-Source Defense Procurements
- Aircraft Parts and Components Supply Chain
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for price inflation
- Supply chain dependency
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, general-electric, aircraft-engine-parts, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, defense-logistics-agency, ohio, manufacturing, pbl-material
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $55.9 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. 8509952020!PBL MATERIAL GE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $55.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-06-14. End: 2024-05-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for similar aircraft engine parts procured from General Electric by the Department of Defense?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for similar aircraft engine parts from General Electric requires access to detailed contract databases. Without specific part numbers or broader contract vehicles, it's challenging to pinpoint exact historical figures. However, the Department of Defense, through agencies like the Defense Logistics Agency, consistently procures a vast array of spare parts and sustainment services for its aircraft fleet. General Electric is a primary contractor for many of these engines, meaning substantial and recurring spending is expected. Past sole-source awards for critical components often indicate a long-term relationship and a recognized need for specialized parts where competition is limited. Trends in defense budgets, aircraft modernization programs, and the operational tempo of the fleet would influence these spending patterns over time.
What specific justification was provided for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis to General Electric?
The justification for a sole-source award typically stems from specific circumstances outlined in federal acquisition regulations (FAR). For aircraft engine parts, common justifications include that General Electric is the sole designer, manufacturer, or possessor of unique technical data or intellectual property rights necessary for the part's production. Alternatively, it could be due to urgent and compelling needs where only GE can meet the delivery timeline, or if the required parts are proprietary and only available from the original equipment manufacturer. The specific justification would be documented in a Justification and Approval (J&A) document, which is usually made public, though sometimes with redactions for proprietary information. Without access to this specific J&A, the precise reason remains speculative but likely relates to technical exclusivity or urgent operational requirements.
How does the pricing of this contract compare to market rates for similar aircraft engine parts, if available?
Directly comparing the pricing of this sole-source contract to 'market rates' is inherently difficult because the absence of competition means there isn't a true market price established through bidding. General Electric, as the sole provider, sets the price. To assess value, one would typically benchmark against previous sole-source awards for similar parts, internal cost estimates if available, or prices charged to commercial customers for comparable (though often not identical) engine models. The firm-fixed-price nature provides cost certainty but does not guarantee affordability. Without access to detailed pricing breakdowns or comparative data from other sole-source awards, a definitive market rate comparison is not feasible. The government relies on negotiation and oversight to ensure the price is 'fair and reasonable' under the circumstances.
What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single supplier for critical aircraft engine parts?
Relying on a single supplier like General Electric for critical aircraft engine parts presents several potential risks. Firstly, there's a risk of supply chain disruption; if GE faces production issues, labor strikes, or natural disasters, the availability of essential parts could be severely impacted, affecting military readiness. Secondly, the lack of competition can lead to price escalation over time, as the government has limited leverage to negotiate lower costs. Thirdly, it can stifle innovation; without competitive pressure, there may be less incentive for the supplier to invest in more efficient manufacturing processes or alternative materials. Lastly, there's a strategic risk of over-dependence, making the government vulnerable to the supplier's business decisions or geopolitical factors affecting the supplier.
What is General Electric's track record in fulfilling similar defense contracts for aircraft engine components?
General Electric has a long and extensive track record as a major supplier of aircraft engines and components to the U.S. Department of Defense and other global militaries. They are a primary provider for numerous aircraft platforms, including fighter jets, bombers, and transport aircraft. Historically, GE has generally demonstrated a strong capability in delivering complex engine systems and sustainment services. However, like any large contractor, they may have faced performance issues or contract disputes on specific programs over the years. Their track record in fulfilling defense contracts for engine components is generally considered robust, characterized by advanced technology and significant production capacity, though specific contract performance can vary.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 NEUMANN WAY, CINCINNATI, OH, 45215
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $55,864,933
Exercised Options: $55,864,933
Current Obligation: $55,864,933
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 9
Total Subaward Amount: $10,808,603
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: SPE4AX23D9420
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-06-14
Current End Date: 2024-05-31
Potential End Date: 2024-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-01-24
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)