DoD's $33.4M contract for PBL Service Support awarded to General Electric Company, raising questions about competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $33,398,405 ($33.4M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2021-12-15
End Date: 2022-12-31
Contract Duration: 381 days
Daily Burn Rate: $87.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 8508746238!PBL SERVICE SUPPORT GE
Place of Performance
Location: LYNN, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01905
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $33.4 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: 8508746238!PBL SERVICE SUPPORT GE Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the fixed-price nature, but the lack of competition limits assurance. 2. Competition dynamics are a significant concern, with a sole-source award preventing market price discovery. 3. Risk indicators include potential overpayment due to limited competition and reliance on a single provider. 4. Performance context is tied to essential aircraft engine support, critical for military readiness. 5. Sector positioning places this within the Defense Logistics Agency's broader sustainment and maintenance operations. 6. The contract's duration of over a year suggests a need for ongoing, critical support services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's $33.4 million value for PBL Service Support is difficult to benchmark without competitive data. As a firm fixed-price contract, it offers some cost certainty. However, the absence of competition means there's no direct comparison to assess if this price represents optimal value for money. The benchmark of $87.7 million for a similar contract suggests this award might be within a reasonable range, but further analysis is needed to confirm true value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, General Electric Company, was solicited. This approach bypasses the standard competitive bidding process. While sole-source awards can be justified for unique capabilities or urgent needs, they inherently limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs for the government compared to a fully competed contract.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price for these essential aircraft engine support services. Without multiple bids, there's less incentive for the contractor to offer the lowest price.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense, specifically units relying on aircraft engines supported by this contract. Services delivered include Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) support, crucial for maintaining aircraft engine readiness and operational availability. The geographic impact is likely widespread, supporting military operations across various bases and deployment locations. Workforce implications may involve specialized technicians and support staff employed by General Electric to fulfill the contract.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition and potential savings for taxpayers.
- Lack of transparency in the selection process for a sole-source contract.
- Potential for vendor lock-in, making future contract negotiations more challenging.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Awarded to General Electric, a known entity with established capabilities in aircraft engine support.
- PBL approach aims to ensure performance and availability, aligning contractor incentives with government needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on the sustainment and maintenance of critical aircraft engine components. The market for such specialized support services is often dominated by original equipment manufacturers like General Electric due to proprietary knowledge and technical expertise. Comparable spending benchmarks in this niche area are difficult to ascertain publicly, but sustainment contracts for major defense platforms often represent significant long-term investments.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as it was awarded directly to General Electric Company. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award. The focus on a large, established prime contractor suggests that the primary benefits will accrue to the prime, with limited direct impact on the broader small business ecosystem unless GE actively engages them for subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Defense Logistics Agency's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) structure, which ties payment to achieved performance metrics. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, but contract details and performance reports are usually available through official channels like FPDS-NG and agency IG reports.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Engine Maintenance and Repair
- Defense Logistics Agency Support Contracts
- Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) Programs
- Sole-Source Defense Procurements
- Aerospace Component Manufacturing and Support
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award may limit price competition.
- Lack of transparency in the procurement process.
- Potential for higher costs due to absence of competitive bidding.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, defense-logistics-agency, general-electric-company, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, pbl-service-support, aircraft-engine-parts-manufacturing, delivery-order, massachusetts, >$100m
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $33.4 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. 8508746238!PBL SERVICE SUPPORT GE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $33.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-12-15. End: 2022-12-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for similar PBL Service Support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense to General Electric?
Analyzing historical spending for similar PBL Service Support contracts awarded by the DoD to General Electric requires access to comprehensive contract databases. While this specific award is for approximately $33.4 million, past awards for related services could range significantly based on the scope, duration, and specific engine platforms supported. For instance, larger, multi-year PBL contracts for major aircraft engine programs can easily reach hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars over their lifecycle. Without specific historical data points for comparable PBL contracts with GE, it's challenging to establish a precise spending pattern. However, it is common for the DoD to engage in long-term sustainment contracts with original equipment manufacturers like GE, indicating a consistent, albeit variable, level of spending in this area to ensure fleet readiness and operational availability of critical assets.
How does the firm fixed-price (FFP) structure of this contract mitigate risks for the government compared to other pricing arrangements?
The Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) structure of this contract significantly mitigates cost risks for the government. Under FFP, the contractor, General Electric Company, assumes the majority of the financial risk associated with cost overruns. This means that the agreed-upon price remains constant regardless of the contractor's actual costs incurred during performance. This contrasts with cost-plus contracts, where the government reimburses the contractor's allowable costs plus a fee, potentially leading to higher expenditures if costs escalate. For the DoD, an FFP contract provides budget certainty and predictability, making financial planning more straightforward. The primary risk shifted to the contractor is managing their resources efficiently to maintain profitability within the fixed price. However, this structure can sometimes lead to higher initial prices as contractors may build in a contingency to cover unforeseen costs.
What are the potential implications of this sole-source award on future competition for aircraft engine support services?
A sole-source award, like the one to General Electric Company for PBL Service Support, can have several implications for future competition. Firstly, it may signal to other potential competitors that the government perceives GE as having unique capabilities or that the market is limited to a single provider for this specific requirement. This can discourage other firms from investing in the necessary infrastructure or expertise to compete in the future. Secondly, without the pressure of a competitive bidding process, GE may have less incentive to innovate or reduce costs aggressively, potentially setting a precedent for higher pricing in subsequent sole-source or limited-competition awards. Conversely, if GE performs exceptionally well and demonstrates significant value, it could strengthen their position for future sole-source renewals. However, the lack of a competitive process inherently limits the government's ability to explore alternative solutions or achieve best value through market forces.
What specific Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) metrics are likely being tracked under this contract, and how do they ensure contractor performance?
Under this Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) contract, specific metrics are likely tied to ensuring the availability, reliability, and maintainability of the aircraft engines supported. Common PBL metrics include: System Readiness Rate (SRR), which measures the percentage of time systems are available for use; Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), indicating the reliability of the engines; and Mean Time To Repair (MTTR), reflecting the efficiency of maintenance actions. Other potential metrics could involve supply chain responsiveness, turnaround times for repairs, and adherence to scheduled maintenance. The contract structure would stipulate performance targets for these metrics, and General Electric's payment would be contingent upon meeting or exceeding them. Failure to meet targets could result in reduced incentive fees or penalties, directly linking contractor compensation to achieving desired operational outcomes and ensuring the government receives value for its investment.
How does the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) typically manage sole-source contracts to ensure fair pricing and adequate oversight?
The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) manages sole-source contracts through established procedures designed to ensure fair pricing and adequate oversight, even in the absence of direct competition. This typically involves rigorous justification for the sole-source award, often requiring detailed documentation of why a competitive process is not feasible or advantageous. DLA contracting officers will conduct thorough price analyses, which may include reviewing historical pricing data, comparing the proposed price to independent cost estimates, or negotiating directly with the contractor based on cost breakdowns. Oversight is maintained through regular performance reviews, audits, and monitoring of contract deliverables against the Statement of Work (SOW). DLA also utilizes its Inspector General (IG) office to investigate potential fraud, waste, or abuse. While sole-source awards inherently reduce price competition, these measures aim to provide a level of assurance that the government is obtaining a fair and reasonable price and that the contractor is meeting their obligations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1000 WESTERN AVE, LYNN, MA, 01905
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $33,398,405
Exercised Options: $33,398,405
Current Obligation: $33,398,405
Actual Outlays: $20,738,161
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 13
Total Subaward Amount: $2,568,737
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: SPE4AX19D9400
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-12-15
Current End Date: 2022-12-31
Potential End Date: 2022-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-09-07
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)