State Department awards $584M for Mexico City embassy construction, exceeding initial estimates

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $584,167,549 ($584.2M)

Contractor: Caddell Construction CO. (DE), LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2017-09-29

End Date: 2024-11-22

Contract Duration: 2,611 days

Daily Burn Rate: $223.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR NEW EMBASSY COMPOUND (NEC) IN MEXICO CITY, MEXICOIGF::OT::IGF OBLIGATION AMOUNT INCLUDES VALUE ADDED TAX (VAT).

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $584.2 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. (DE), LLC for work described as: CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR NEW EMBASSY COMPOUND (NEC) IN MEXICO CITY, MEXICOIGF::OT::IGF OBLIGATION AMOUNT INCLUDES VALUE ADDED TAX (VAT). Key points: 1. The contract's final obligation amount significantly surpassed initial projections, indicating potential cost overruns or scope expansion. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust bidding process that should have theoretically driven competitive pricing. 3. The project duration of 2611 days (approximately 7 years) is substantial, raising questions about project management and potential delays. 4. The use of a Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to transfer risk to the contractor, but the final cost suggests this may not have been fully achieved. 5. The contractor, Caddell Construction Co., has a history of large-scale government projects, but performance on this specific contract needs scrutiny. 6. The inclusion of VAT in the obligation amount is a standard practice but contributes to the overall high value of the award.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The final obligation of $584 million for the construction of a new embassy compound in Mexico City appears high, especially considering the project's extended duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale embassy construction projects or major institutional building projects in comparable regions would be necessary for a definitive value assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests a defined scope, but the final cost warrants a review of change orders and potential scope creep to understand the value delivered relative to the initial expectations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited. This method is generally preferred for maximizing competition and achieving the best possible pricing for the government. The number of bids received and the details of the evaluation process would provide further insight into the effectiveness of this competition in driving down costs and ensuring a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of receiving competitive bids, potentially leading to lower overall project costs and better value for the investment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Department of State and its personnel, who will gain a new, modern, and secure embassy facility in Mexico City. The project delivers critical infrastructure for diplomatic operations, enhancing the U.S. presence and capabilities in Mexico. The geographic impact is concentrated in Mexico City, supporting local economic activity through construction jobs and related services. Workforce implications include significant employment opportunities for construction labor, engineers, architects, and project managers, both locally and potentially from the U.S.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns despite a firm fixed-price contract.
  • Extended project duration raises concerns about efficiency and potential delays.
  • Complexity of international construction projects can introduce unforeseen risks.
  • Ensuring adherence to security and construction standards for an embassy compound.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
  • Firm fixed-price contract aims to control costs and transfer risk.
  • Contractor has experience in large-scale government construction projects.
  • Project addresses a critical need for diplomatic infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. The market for large-scale government facilities, such as embassies, is specialized, often involving stringent security requirements and international logistics. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other embassy constructions or major government building projects globally, considering factors like location, size, and complexity. The total obligation amount places this project in the category of major federal construction awards.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus, as the 'small business set-aside' flag is false and no specific subcontracting goals are mentioned. While Caddell Construction Co. may utilize small businesses in its supply chain, the primary award does not appear to be structured to directly benefit small businesses through set-asides. This could limit opportunities for smaller firms to directly engage in such a large-scale project, though they might participate as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) and its contracting officers. Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction would likely reside with the Department of State's Office of Inspector General, which conducts audits and investigations into waste, fraud, and abuse in departmental programs and operations. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed project progress and financial oversight reports may not be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

  • New Embassy Compound Construction
  • Department of State Facilities Management
  • Overseas Infrastructure Projects
  • Large-Scale Commercial Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost escalation beyond initial expectations.
  • Extended project timeline may indicate management challenges.
  • Lack of detailed performance metrics in summary data.
  • Complexity of international construction projects.

Tags

construction, department-of-state, mexico-city, definitive-contract, large-value, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, infrastructure, embassy, international-project

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $584.2 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. (DE), LLC. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR NEW EMBASSY COMPOUND (NEC) IN MEXICO CITY, MEXICOIGF::OT::IGF OBLIGATION AMOUNT INCLUDES VALUE ADDED TAX (VAT).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. (DE), LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $584.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-09-29. End: 2024-11-22.

What was the original estimated cost for the New Embassy Compound in Mexico City, and how does the final obligation amount compare?

The provided data does not include the original estimated cost for the New Embassy Compound (NEC) in Mexico City. However, the final obligation amount reached $584,167,549.09. Without the initial estimate, it is difficult to quantify the extent of any potential cost growth or overruns. A comprehensive analysis would require accessing the original solicitation documents or budget proposals to establish a baseline for comparison. Understanding the variance between the initial estimate and the final cost is crucial for assessing project financial management and identifying factors that may have contributed to cost increases, such as scope changes, unforeseen site conditions, or market fluctuations in material and labor costs.

How many bids were received for this contract, and what was the range of proposed prices?

The provided data indicates that the contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' and notes '2' offers were received. However, the specific proposed prices from each bidder are not detailed in this summary. To fully assess the competitiveness of the bidding process, further information would be needed, such as the number of proposals submitted, the evaluation criteria used, and the pricing details of each offer. A wide range of bids could suggest varying interpretations of the scope or different approaches to execution, while a narrow range might indicate a more mature understanding of the project requirements among the bidders. Accessing the source solicitation and award documents would provide this granular detail.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this construction contract, and how has the contractor performed against them?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) established for this construction contract, nor does it offer a detailed performance evaluation of Caddell Construction Co., LLC. Typically, for large construction projects, KPIs would include adherence to schedule, quality of workmanship, safety compliance, budget management, and responsiveness to directives. Performance assessments are usually documented in contract performance reports (CPARs) or similar official records. Without access to these specific performance metrics and evaluations, it is challenging to definitively assess the contractor's success in meeting the project's objectives beyond the final cost and duration.

Have there been significant change orders or scope modifications during the contract period that contributed to the final cost?

The provided data does not explicitly detail any change orders or scope modifications that may have occurred during the contract period for the New Embassy Compound (NEC) in Mexico City. However, given the substantial final obligation amount ($584,167,549.09) and the extended duration (2611 days), it is plausible that changes were incorporated. Large-scale, long-term construction projects often involve adjustments due to unforeseen site conditions, evolving requirements, or design refinements. A thorough review of the contract's modification history, including all issued change orders and their associated costs and justifications, would be necessary to determine their impact on the final price and timeline.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar embassy construction projects managed by the Department of State?

The provided data focuses solely on the Mexico City NEC contract and does not offer historical spending patterns for similar projects. To establish such a pattern, one would need to analyze a portfolio of past embassy construction or major facility upgrades undertaken by the Department of State, particularly those managed by the Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO). This analysis should consider project size, location, complexity, duration, and final costs, adjusted for inflation. Comparing the Mexico City project's cost per square foot or per functional unit against historical averages would provide context on whether its final obligation amount is within the expected range for comparable endeavors.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICESARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: SAQMMA17R0234

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Caddell Construction CO., Inc.

Address: 2700 LAGOON PARK DR, MONTGOMERY, AL, 36109

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $584,167,549

Exercised Options: $584,167,549

Current Obligation: $584,167,549

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2017-09-29

Current End Date: 2024-11-22

Potential End Date: 2024-11-22 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-10-13

More Contracts from Caddell Construction CO. (DE), LLC

View all Caddell Construction CO. (DE), LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of State Contracts

View all Department of State contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending