State Department awards $24M for overseas contract services, with Acuity - Janus Global, LLC as prime

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,091,483 ($24.1M)

Contractor: Acuity - Janus Global, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2012-03-23

End Date: 2017-09-23

Contract Duration: 2,010 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: OVERSEAS CONTRACT

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $24.1 million to ACUITY - JANUS GLOBAL, LLC for work described as: OVERSEAS CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract value of $24.1M over 5 years indicates significant investment in overseas services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. The contract's duration and scope imply a need for sustained, specialized support. 4. Performance context is crucial given the overseas nature of the services, requiring adaptability and reliability. 5. Sector positioning within Remediation Services highlights a niche but critical area of government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $24.1 million over five years for overseas remediation services appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the work and the extended period of performance. Benchmarking against similar contracts for overseas environmental remediation or base support services would provide a clearer picture of value for money. However, the absence of specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns makes a definitive value assessment challenging without further data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while initial exclusions might have occurred, the final award was made after a broad solicitation. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a competitive environment. This approach aims to ensure that the government receives the best possible offers by allowing all responsible sources to compete.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process like this typically benefits taxpayers by driving down costs and encouraging innovation from multiple providers, leading to more efficient use of public funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely U.S. diplomatic missions and personnel operating overseas, who rely on these services for safe and functional environments. Services delivered likely include environmental remediation, hazardous material management, and potentially site restoration or maintenance in foreign locations. Geographic impact is global, focusing on U.S. government facilities and operations abroad. Workforce implications could involve both direct hires by the contractor and potential local employment opportunities in host countries, depending on the scope of work.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor effectiveness and efficiency.
The overseas nature of the contract introduces geopolitical and logistical risks that may impact service delivery.
Limited information on specific remediation activities could obscure potential environmental or safety concerns.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
Long-term contract (5 years) provides stability and continuity for essential overseas services.
Prime contractor, Acuity - Janus Global, LLC, likely possesses specialized expertise for this niche service area.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on environmental remediation. The market for such services is driven by regulatory compliance, environmental stewardship, and the need to manage legacy contamination or ongoing operational impacts. Government contracts in this area are often substantial due to the complexity and critical nature of remediation projects, especially in diverse overseas environments.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Acuity - Janus Global, LLC, and there is no indication of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements in the provided data. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if there were opportunities missed for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of State's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards, reporting requirements, and potential penalties for non-compliance. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed operational oversight information is often internal.

Related Government Programs

Overseas Base Operations Support
Environmental Consulting Services
Hazardous Material Management
Facilities Engineering and Maintenance

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Geopolitical and logistical risks inherent in overseas operations.
Unforeseen environmental conditions could increase project scope and cost.
Limited transparency on specific remediation activities and performance metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $24.1 million to ACUITY - JANUS GLOBAL, LLC. OVERSEAS CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ACUITY - JANUS GLOBAL, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-03-23. End: 2017-09-23.

What specific types of remediation services are covered under this contract, and what are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure success?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Remediation Services' (NAICS 562910) but does not detail the specific types of remediation. These could range from soil and groundwater cleanup to hazardous waste disposal and site restoration. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are not detailed in the summary data. Typically, for such contracts, KPIs would focus on environmental compliance, project completion timelines, cost control, safety incident rates, and stakeholder satisfaction. Without access to the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and performance work statement (PWS), a precise list of services and KPIs cannot be determined. The value of $24.1 million over five years suggests a significant scope, likely encompassing multiple sites or complex environmental challenges requiring ongoing management and execution.

How does the $24.1 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar overseas remediation services by the Department of State or other agencies?

Comparing the $24.1 million contract value requires context on the scale and duration of similar services. The Department of State, like other agencies operating abroad (e.g., Department of Defense), engages in remediation services for environmental compliance, site closure, and hazardous material management. Historical spending data for specific overseas remediation contracts is not readily available in this summary. However, a five-year contract of this magnitude suggests a substantial and ongoing need. For perspective, large-scale environmental remediation projects can run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars over many years. The 'full and open competition' aspect suggests the government sought competitive bids, which should theoretically align the price with market rates for comparable services, adjusted for overseas operational complexities.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, considering its overseas nature and the remediation services provided?

The primary risks associated with this contract are multifaceted. Firstly, the overseas nature introduces geopolitical instability, varying regulatory environments, logistical challenges (transportation, access, security), and potential cultural or language barriers. Secondly, remediation services themselves carry inherent risks, including unforeseen site conditions (e.g., discovering more contamination than initially assessed), potential health and safety hazards for workers and the public, and the possibility of incomplete or ineffective cleanup, leading to long-term environmental liabilities. Furthermore, contractor performance risk is always present, including potential delays, cost overruns, or failure to meet technical specifications. The 'Time and Materials' contract type (PT) can also pose a risk of cost escalation if not closely managed and monitored.

What is Acuity - Janus Global, LLC's track record with government contracts, particularly in overseas remediation or similar service areas?

Acuity - Janus Global, LLC's track record with government contracts, particularly in overseas remediation, is a critical factor in assessing this award. While the provided data confirms them as the prime contractor for this $24.1 million Department of State contract, it does not detail their past performance history. A thorough assessment would require reviewing their contract history, including past performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports), any past disputes or terminations, and their experience with similar projects in terms of scope, complexity, and geographic location. Companies specializing in environmental services often have a portfolio of government work, but their specific success in overseas remediation would be a key indicator of their capability and reliability for this particular contract.

Given the 'Time and Materials' (PT) contract type, what measures are in place to control costs and ensure value for money?

The 'Time and Materials' (PT) contract type, while offering flexibility, inherently carries a higher risk of cost escalation if not rigorously managed. To control costs and ensure value for money, the Department of State would typically implement several oversight measures. These include establishing clear labor categories with pre-defined hourly rates, setting ceilings on total contract value and specific task orders, requiring detailed timesheets and justifications for hours worked, and implementing robust monitoring of material costs. Regular progress reviews, audits of contractor records, and performance-based incentives or penalties can also be employed. The contracting officer's representative (COR) plays a crucial role in overseeing daily activities, verifying work performed, and ensuring that resources are used efficiently and appropriately according to the contract's objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: QUALITY CONTROL, TEST, INSPECTION › OTHER QUALITY, TEST, INSPECT SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: EOD Technology Inc.

Address: 2229 OLD HWY 95, LENOIR CITY, TN, 37771

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,701,785

Exercised Options: $24,701,785

Current Obligation: $24,091,483

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SAQMMA11D0103

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline