State Dept. Spends $21.6M on Configuration Management Services with ASSYST INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,620,373 ($21.6M)

Contractor: Assyst Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2009-11-25

End Date: 2016-09-06

Contract Duration: 2,477 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: IT

Official Description: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20520

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $21.6 million to ASSYST INC. for work described as: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $21.6 million over nearly 7 years. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting some market vetting. 3. Risk is moderate due to the long duration and potential for vendor lock-in. 4. Sector is IT services, specifically Computer Systems Design. 5. Contract type is labor hours, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's labor hour pricing model makes direct comparison difficult without detailed task breakdowns. However, the total value suggests a substantial investment in configuration management services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources. This method allows for broad market participation but the exclusion clause warrants scrutiny to ensure it didn't unduly limit competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers funded $21.6 million for these services over the contract's lifespan.

Public Impact

Ensures stability and integrity of IT systems for the Department of State. Supports critical government operations through effective IT asset management. Potential for cost savings if configuration management leads to reduced IT incidents and faster deployments.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically computer systems design. Spending benchmarks for similar configuration management services can vary widely based on scope and complexity, but $21.6M over nearly 7 years indicates a significant, long-term engagement.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had opportunities to participate in the subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of State, implying internal oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration and labor-hour nature necessitate robust monitoring to ensure accountability and prevent cost overruns.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, department-of-state, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $21.6 million to ASSYST INC.. CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ASSYST INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-11-25. End: 2016-09-06.

What specific configuration management tasks were performed, and how did the labor hours translate into value?

The provided data lacks specifics on the exact configuration management tasks performed. A detailed review of task orders and deliverables would be necessary to assess the value derived from the labor hours expended. Understanding the scope of work, such as system inventories, change control, and baseline management, is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of the $21.6 million investment.

Were there any risks associated with the 'exclusion of sources' clause in the competition, and how were they mitigated?

The 'exclusion of sources' clause, while allowing for full and open competition among the remaining pool, inherently limits the potential bidder pool. The risk is that legitimate, capable vendors might be excluded without proper justification, potentially leading to suboptimal pricing or reduced innovation. Mitigation would involve a clear, documented rationale for the exclusion and ensuring the remaining competition was robust enough to drive value.

How effectively did ASSYST INC. manage IT configurations to ensure system stability and security for the Department of State?

Assessing the effectiveness requires examining performance metrics, incident reports, and system uptime data during the contract period. While the contract value is substantial, effectiveness hinges on the quality of service delivery. A review of past performance evaluations and any documented successes or failures in maintaining IT configurations would provide insight into ASSYST INC.'s performance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 22866 SHAW RD, STERLING, VA, 20166

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $49,534,034

Exercised Options: $45,299,036

Current Obligation: $21,620,373

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS06F0596Z

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-11-25

Current End Date: 2016-09-06

Potential End Date: 2016-09-06 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-09-09

More Contracts from Assyst Inc.

View all Assyst Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of State Contracts

View all Department of State contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending