State Department awards $238.6M for Kyiv Embassy construction, highlighting significant infrastructure investment in Ukraine
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $238,583,979 ($238.6M)
Contractor: BL Harbert International LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of State
Start Date: 2008-09-30
End Date: 2013-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,826 days
Daily Burn Rate: $130.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: INITIAL AWARD, KYIV UKRAINE. NEW EMBASSY COMPOUND - KYIV,UKRAINE
Plain-Language Summary
Department of State obligated $238.6 million to BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL LLC for work described as: INITIAL AWARD, KYIV UKRAINE. NEW EMBASSY COMPOUND - KYIV,UKRAINE Key points: 1. The contract represents a substantial investment in diplomatic infrastructure, crucial for U.S. presence in a key geopolitical region. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process aimed at achieving competitive pricing. 3. The fixed-price contract structure shifts performance risk to the contractor, BL Harbert International LLC. 4. Construction duration of 1826 days indicates a long-term, complex project with significant logistical considerations. 5. The project's scale and location present unique geopolitical and security risks that require careful management. 6. This award is a major component of the State Department's global embassy construction and modernization efforts.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $238.6 million for a new embassy compound in Kyiv is substantial, reflecting the complexity and security requirements of such a project. Benchmarking against similar large-scale diplomatic construction projects globally would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the location and the need for state-of-the-art facilities, the price appears within a reasonable range for a project of this magnitude. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract also suggests that the contractor bears the primary financial risk, which can be a positive indicator of cost control if managed effectively.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited and evaluated. This approach is generally favored as it promotes a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and quality for the government. The presence of two bidders, as indicated by the 'no' field, suggests a degree of competition, though a higher number of bidders would typically indicate stronger price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a market where contractors must offer competitive bids to secure the work, potentially driving down costs and improving service delivery.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Department of State and its personnel, who will gain a secure and modern facility in Ukraine. The contract delivers critical construction services for a new embassy compound, essential for diplomatic operations. The geographic impact is focused on Kyiv, Ukraine, signifying a long-term commitment to the region. Workforce implications include job creation for construction workers, engineers, and project managers, both locally and potentially from the U.S.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Geopolitical instability in the region could impact project timelines, costs, and security.
- Logistical challenges of construction in a foreign capital may lead to delays and increased expenses.
- The long duration of the project increases the potential for unforeseen issues and cost overruns, despite the fixed-price nature.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
- Firm fixed-price contract shifts risk to the contractor, incentivizing cost control.
- The project addresses a critical need for secure diplomatic facilities.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. The global market for embassy construction is specialized, driven by government agencies with stringent security and operational requirements. Projects of this scale often involve significant lead times for design, permitting, and execution. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found in large-scale government infrastructure projects or major commercial construction endeavors, though the unique security and diplomatic needs of an embassy add a premium.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this specific award, as the 'sb' field is false and 'ss' is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting plans. This suggests that the prime contract was likely awarded to a large business, and any small business involvement would be at the subcontractor level, determined by the prime contractor. Further analysis would be needed to ascertain the extent of small business subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of State's Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO), which manages the design and construction of U.S. diplomatic facilities worldwide. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified compound within the agreed budget and timeline. Transparency is facilitated through contract awards databases and reporting requirements, though specific project oversight details may not be publicly disseminated.
Related Government Programs
- New Embassy Compound Construction
- Department of State Facilities Management
- Overseas Infrastructure Projects
- International Construction Contracts
Risk Flags
- Geopolitical Risk (Ukraine)
- Security Concerns (Embassy)
- Long Project Duration
- Logistical Complexity (International Construction)
- Potential for Cost Overruns (despite fixed price)
Tags
construction, department-of-state, kyiv, ukraine, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, large-contract, infrastructure, diplomatic-facility, overseas-construction
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of State awarded $238.6 million to BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL LLC. INITIAL AWARD, KYIV UKRAINE. NEW EMBASSY COMPOUND - KYIV,UKRAINE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $238.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-09-30. End: 2013-09-30.
What is the track record of BL Harbert International LLC in executing large-scale government construction projects, particularly overseas?
BL Harbert International LLC has a significant track record in constructing large-scale projects, including numerous government and military facilities both domestically and internationally. They have experience with complex projects requiring adherence to strict security protocols and demanding timelines. Their portfolio often includes embassy construction, barracks, and other critical infrastructure. While specific performance metrics for all past projects are not detailed here, their repeated selection for substantial government contracts suggests a capacity to meet the requirements of such demanding work. A deeper dive into past performance evaluations and any past performance issues would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability for this Kyiv project.
How does the cost per square foot of this embassy compound compare to similar diplomatic facilities built by the U.S. or other nations?
Determining the exact cost per square foot requires detailed information on the total building area, which is not provided in the initial award data. However, embassy construction is typically significantly more expensive per square foot than standard commercial or residential buildings due to extensive security features (e.g., blast-resistant materials, secure perimeters, advanced surveillance systems), specialized IT infrastructure, redundancy in power and communications, and compliance with stringent U.S. government standards. Projects in challenging geopolitical locations like Kyiv can also incur higher costs due to security premiums and logistical complexities. Without specific square footage and detailed cost breakdowns, a precise comparison is difficult, but it is expected to be substantially higher than average construction costs.
What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract, beyond general construction risks?
The primary risk indicators for this contract are heavily influenced by its location and purpose. Geopolitical instability in Ukraine presents a significant risk, potentially leading to security threats, supply chain disruptions, labor availability issues, and even project suspension or termination. The long duration (1826 days) amplifies risks related to changing political landscapes, evolving security requirements, and potential material cost fluctuations, even under a fixed-price contract. Furthermore, the sensitive nature of an embassy compound means that security breaches or construction-related incidents could have severe diplomatic and political repercussions. Logistical challenges in delivering materials and personnel to Kyiv also pose a considerable risk.
How effective has the Department of State's Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) been in managing similar large-scale embassy construction projects?
The Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) is responsible for a vast portfolio of diplomatic construction projects globally. Historically, OBO has faced challenges with cost overruns and schedule delays on some high-profile projects, often attributed to the complexity, security requirements, and unforeseen conditions encountered in overseas environments. However, OBO has also successfully delivered numerous state-of-the-art facilities that enhance U.S. diplomatic presence and security. They have implemented various reforms and improved project management strategies over the years to mitigate risks and enhance efficiency. The success rate can vary significantly by project, location, and the specific contractors involved. Continuous oversight and adaptation are key to their effectiveness.
What has been the historical spending trend for new embassy construction or major renovations by the Department of State over the last decade?
The Department of State's spending on new embassy construction and major renovations has been substantial and relatively consistent over the last decade, reflecting a commitment to modernizing its global diplomatic infrastructure. While specific annual figures fluctuate based on project pipelines, major awards like the one for Kyiv represent significant investments. The overall trend indicates a sustained need for secure, functional, and technologically advanced diplomatic facilities worldwide. Factors influencing spending include geopolitical priorities, the condition of existing facilities, and security directives. The Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) budget typically allocates significant portions to capital construction projects, often in the hundreds of millions to billions of dollars annually, depending on the number and scale of active projects.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: SAQMMA08R0083
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: B.L. Harbert Holdings, L.L.C. (UEI: 147371236)
Address: 820 SHADES CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $238,583,979
Exercised Options: $238,583,979
Current Obligation: $238,583,979
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-09-30
Current End Date: 2013-09-30
Potential End Date: 2013-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-09-23
More Contracts from BL Harbert International LLC
- TAS::19 0535 000::TAS NEW Embassey Compound and Housing, Islamabad, Pakistan — $871.5M (Department of State)
- Base Award for Construction Manager AS Constructor Clin-001 for Design-Phase Services for Hanoi NEC — $815.9M (Department of State)
- Beirut, Lebanon NEW Embassy Constructionigf::cl::igf — $731.6M (Department of State)
- Construction Services for the NEW Embassy Compound in NEW Delhi, India — $685.1M (Department of State)
- Construction Services for NEW Emabssy Compound in London, England. Igf::ot::igf — $636.0M (Department of State)
Other Department of State Contracts
- Care Logistical Support Services - Clss — $2.3B (Xator LLC)
- Task Order to Provide Project Management Support, Transition Support, Engineering and Design Support, Securing the Infrastructure Support and O&M Support for the Department's IT Consolidation Program — $2.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Global Security Engineering&supply Chain Services — $1.5B (General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.)
- Slmaqm04c0030 — $1.2B (Dyncorp International LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Establish a NEW Contract With General Dynamics Information Technology for Global Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Technology Development Services to Support the Department of State. the Initial Funding Associated With This Contract IS $22,304,578.00. the Overall Contract Value IS $2,200,000,000.00 — $1.2B (General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.)