DoD's $14.9M Taiwan System Engineering Contract Awarded to Science Applications International Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,893,558 ($14.9M)

Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-01

End Date: 2009-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,552 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Engineering Services

Official Description: TAIWAN SYSTEM ENGINEERING, ILS, AND TRAINING

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92110, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.9 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: TAIWAN SYSTEM ENGINEERING, ILS, AND TRAINING Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a large, established defense contractor. 2. Significant spending in Engineering Services sector. 3. Potential for cost overruns given Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure. 4. Limited direct small business participation indicated.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure can lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar CPFF contracts for engineering services is needed to assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the CPFF pricing structure may not have fully optimized price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for engineering services, with the final cost influenced by the CPFF structure and contractor performance.

Public Impact

Supports critical defense systems for Taiwan. Involves complex engineering, integration, and training services. Potential impact on geopolitical stability and defense readiness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee pricing
  • Long contract duration
  • Potential for scope creep

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition
  • Experienced contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is a significant area of government spending. Benchmarks for similar large-scale engineering support contracts are essential for evaluating cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates no direct small business participation in this prime contract. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist but are not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight by the Department of the Navy is crucial, especially given the CPFF contract type, to ensure cost control and adherence to scope.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee pricing structure
  • Long contract duration (over 4 years)
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Lack of direct small business participation

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, ca, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.9 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. TAIWAN SYSTEM ENGINEERING, ILS, AND TRAINING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-01. End: 2009-12-31.

What was the final cost compared to the initial estimate, and how did it align with similar CPFF contracts?

Without the final cost data and comparison metrics, it's difficult to definitively assess value. CPFF contracts inherently carry a risk of exceeding initial estimates due to cost-reimbursement elements. A thorough review would involve comparing the final expenditure against the estimated cost and benchmarking against similar contracts awarded under comparable conditions and scope.

What specific risks were identified during the contract's lifecycle, and how were they mitigated?

Potential risks include scope creep, cost overruns due to the CPFF structure, and performance issues in delivering complex engineering and training. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust contract management, regular performance reviews, clear definition of deliverables, and proactive risk identification and management processes by the contracting officer.

How effectively did the contractor meet the performance objectives and deliver the required engineering, ILS, and training services?

Effectiveness is typically measured by meeting performance metrics outlined in the contract, such as on-time delivery, quality of engineering solutions, successful integration, and training program outcomes. Post-contract reviews and performance reports would provide insights into the contractor's success in fulfilling these objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002405R3282

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1710 SAIC DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4119

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-10-01

Current End Date: 2009-12-31

Potential End Date: 2009-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-02-16

More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation

View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending