NASA's $31M JPL Contract with Caltech: FFRDC Operations and Directed Tasks

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $31,102,710 ($31.1M)

Contractor: California Institute of Technology

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2014-04-09

End Date: 2020-11-30

Contract Duration: 2,427 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF JPL INSTRUMENT INCUBATOR PROGRAM (IIP) 2013 AWARDED TASKS AND IIP RELATED DIRECTED TASKS THE CONTRACT IS THE SPONSORING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) AND THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (CONTRACTOR), A PRIVATE NONPROFIT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, WHICH ESTABLISHES THE RELATIONSHIP FOR THE OPERATION OF THE FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER (FFRDC) KNOWN AS THE JET PROPULSION LABORATORY. THE CONTRACTOR, JPL, IS REQUIRED TO PERFORM WORK THAT IS DESIGNATED IN TASK ORDERS ISSUED BY THE NASA MANAGEMENT OFFICE (NMO) CONTRACTING OFFICERS. NASA - SPONSORED WORK: JPL'S PRIMARY MISSION IS TO SUPPORT THE NASA SCIENCE MISSION DIRECTORATE (SMD) IN CARRYING OUT THE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES IDENTIFIED IN THE SMD SCIENCE PLAN. THE FOUR BROAD SCIENTIFIC AREAS ARE: EARTH SCIENCE, PLANETARY SCIENCE, HELIOPHYSICS, AND ASTROPHYSICS. IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT, JPL SHALL: 1) SUPPLY A BROAD BASE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES RELEVANT TO NASA PROGRAM AND PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS. 2) FOSTER ITS UNIQUE RELATIONSHIP WITH A TOP-TIER UNIVERSITY TO FACILITATE THE INVOLVEMENT OF SCIENTISTS, ENGINEERS, AND STUDENTS FROM THE UNIVERSITY AND RESEARCH COMMUNITIES IN NASA MISSION AND IN SUPPORTING OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. 3) SUPPORT NASA IN ENABLING PROGRAM AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPABILITIES. 4) DEVELOP SPACECRAFT AND INSTRUMENTS THAT ARE SENT TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS WITH OUR SOLAR SYSTEM, INCLUDING EARTH ORBIT, PLANETS, PLANETARY SATELLITES, ASTEROIDS, AND COMETS. THESE MISSIONS MAY BE ORBITERS, LANDERS, OR ROVERS, AND TYPICALLY INCLUDE CUTTING-EDGE TECHNOLOGIES REQUIRED TO MEET SCIENTIFIC REQUIREMENTS. 5) PERFORM PROJECT TASKS INVOLVING: (I) AUTONOMOUS DEEP-SPACE, INNER-SPACE AND EARTH-ORBITING SPACECRAFT OR MAJOR SUBSYSTEMS, (II) EXPERIMENTS, INSTRUMENTS, OR OTHER DEVICES WHICH MAY BE CARRIED AS PAYLOAD ON SPACECRAFTS IN MISSIONS MANAGED BY OTHERS, AND/OR (III) GROUND-BASED SYSTEMS. 6) BEYOND ITS PRIMARY MISSION, JPL MAY PERFORM WORK FOR OTHER NASA MISSION DIRECTORATES OR OFFICES. 7) JPL IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION, RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY INSERTION, AND MANAGEMENT OF NASA S DEEP SPACE NETWORK TO PROVIDE TELECOMMUNICATION AND OPERATION SERVICES, INCLUDING DATA ACQUISITION AND DATA DELIVERY REQUIRED TO MEET ESTABLISHED AGENCY OBJECTIVES. 8) JPL IS ALSO REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN AND CONDUCT AN EDUCATION PROGRAM IN CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE NASA HEADQUARTERS EDUCATION OFFICE, THE ACADEMIC COMMUNITY AT LARGE, AND IN SUPPORT TO NASA STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES TO IMPROVE STUDENT RETENTION IN THE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) DISCIPLINES. WORK FOR NON-NASA SPONSORS: JPL MAY PERFORM WORK FOR NON-NASA SPONSORS. THIS WORK WILL BE DESIGNATED IN TASK ORDERS ISSUED BY NMO CONTRACTING OFFICERS BASED ON TASK PLANS INITIATED BY THE CONTRACTOR.

Place of Performance

Location: PASADENA, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91109

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $31.1 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF JPL INSTRUMENT INCUBATOR PROGRAM (IIP) 2013 AWARDED TASKS AND IIP RELATED DIRECTED TASKS THE CONTRACT IS THE SPONSORING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) AND THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (CONTRACTOR), A PRIVATE NONPR… Key points: 1. The contract funds the operation of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) as a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC). 2. Work is performed under task orders issued by NASA, focusing on supporting NASA's Science Mission Directorate objectives. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, indicating potential for cost overruns. 4. The sector is R&D, specifically physical, engineering, and life sciences, aligning with NASA's mission.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar FFRDC contracts would be beneficial.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract is sole-source, awarded to the California Institute of Technology for operating JPL. This limits price discovery and competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are used to support a critical research and development facility, with oversight needed to ensure value for money.

Public Impact

Supports cutting-edge scientific research and space exploration missions. Ensures continued operation of the vital Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Funds research and development in advanced physical, engineering, and life sciences. Contributes to national scientific and technological advancement.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition.
  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type carries inherent cost risk.
  • Long duration (2427 days) requires sustained oversight.

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical national research and development.
  • Operates a key FFRDC (JPL).
  • Aligns with NASA's core mission objectives.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. Spending in this area is crucial for innovation but requires careful management to ensure efficient use of funds.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication of small business involvement in this contract, as it is a direct award to a large educational institution for FFRDC operations.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is managed by the NASA Management Office (NMO) through task orders. The FFRDC structure implies a level of government oversight, but the cost-plus nature necessitates vigilance.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Lack of transparency in task order justification
  • Limited opportunities for external innovation

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $31.1 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. IGF::CL::IGF JPL INSTRUMENT INCUBATOR PROGRAM (IIP) 2013 AWARDED TASKS AND IIP RELATED DIRECTED TASKS THE CONTRACT IS THE SPONSORING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) AND THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (CONTRACTOR), A PRIVATE NONPROFIT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, WHICH ESTABLISHES THE RELATIONSHIP FOR THE OPERATION OF THE FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER (FFRDC) KNOWN AS THE JET PROPULSION LABORATORY. THE CONTRACTOR, JPL, IS REQUIRED

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-04-09. End: 2020-11-30.

What is the cost-effectiveness of the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure for FFRDC operations compared to other contract types?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can incentivize contractors to incur costs to achieve a fixed profit. For FFRDCs, this structure might be necessary due to the exploratory nature of research. However, it requires robust oversight to prevent unnecessary expenditures and ensure the fixed fee remains reasonable relative to the work performed and market conditions.

How does NASA ensure that the directed tasks align with strategic science objectives and represent the best use of taxpayer funds?

NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD) defines the strategic objectives, and task orders are issued by NMO contracting officers. This process should involve rigorous justification for each task, alignment with the SMD Science Plan, and potentially independent reviews to ensure scientific merit and efficient resource allocation.

What are the long-term implications of a sole-source FFRDC contract for innovation and competition in related research areas?

Sole-source FFRDC contracts ensure continuity for critical national assets like JPL. However, they can limit broader innovation by not engaging a wider pool of research institutions. NASA may mitigate this by funding other research through competitive grants and contracts outside the FFRDC framework.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTSpace R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4800 OAK GROVE DR, PASADENA, CA, 91109

Business Categories: Category Business, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $45,936,879

Exercised Options: $45,936,879

Current Obligation: $31,102,710

Actual Outlays: $74,940

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNN12AA01C

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-04-09

Current End Date: 2020-11-30

Potential End Date: 2020-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-08-13

More Contracts from California Institute of Technology

View all California Institute of Technology federal contracts →

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending